- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chat GPT simply refuses to quote or read the Bible but buddist dhammapada is fine.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:29 am to junkyarddawg3
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:29 am to junkyarddawg3
My model is this -
- If the story comes from a content creator/influencer account that is premised on getting a rise out of conservatives - they have a profit interest in skewing things in that direction or outright concocting them from nothing. So I start with the assumption that it's skewed at best. This means if the post is very obviously intended to draw outrage, I do not take it at face value.
- If it's a regular person - which is rarely the case for this type of stuff posted on here - then I'm more likely to assume it's a good faith, real life observance.
On this board, I'm not sure if people ignore the distinction entirely, or they just can't discern that PatriotBlonde66 with 25k followers isn't simply a good faith, regular woman who happens to be patriotic and like politics.
- If the story comes from a content creator/influencer account that is premised on getting a rise out of conservatives - they have a profit interest in skewing things in that direction or outright concocting them from nothing. So I start with the assumption that it's skewed at best. This means if the post is very obviously intended to draw outrage, I do not take it at face value.
- If it's a regular person - which is rarely the case for this type of stuff posted on here - then I'm more likely to assume it's a good faith, real life observance.
On this board, I'm not sure if people ignore the distinction entirely, or they just can't discern that PatriotBlonde66 with 25k followers isn't simply a good faith, regular woman who happens to be patriotic and like politics.
1
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:41 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
A: No. I can quote, discuss, and analyze the Bible. If you've encountered a refusal, it's usually because of one of a few situations:
• Copyright: Some modern Bible translations (such as the NIV, NLT, ESV, CSB, etc.) are copyrighted. I can quote them, but not provide very long passages. Public-domain translations like the King James Version (KJV) and American Standard Version (ASV) can generally be quoted much more extensively
Since when was the Bible copyrighted?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Who needs ChatGPT when we have Twitter to think for us?
Who needs chatgpt when we have our own scriptures to read...why would anyone trust chats interpretation of what scriptures say?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:43 am to Ailsa
quote:
Since when was the Bible copyrighted?
Are you retarded?
At the very least I give you some credit for popping back into a thread that you started based on a bullshite premise. Too bad you can’t show any contrition.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:44 am to Ailsa
quote:
why would anyone trust chats interpretation of what scriptures say?
Why would anyone trust some random X post?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:50 am to Pettifogger
quote:
PatriotBlonde66 with 25k followers isn't simply a good faith, regular woman who happens to be patriotic and like politics.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 11:54 am to Ailsa
I use ChatGPT with biblical passages every day. It's been a real gift in having quick understanding.
Yesterday with the parable of wheat and weeds for instance.
Yesterday with the parable of wheat and weeds for instance.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 11:56 am
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:04 pm to Ailsa
I wonder if that guy had context where he directed it not to talk about the Bible, because all AI platforms I've used are fine to quote from and discuss the Bible and other Christian works.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:12 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I wonder if that guy had context where he directed it not to talk about the Bible
Very likely he programmed it to do just that, so he could get low IQ morons to get outraged and share his post with all their friends.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:21 pm to Ailsa
ChatGPT is an incredible tool for Biblical analysis.
But like anything of the sort: GIGO.
But like anything of the sort: GIGO.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:30 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Why would anyone trust some random X post?
Why would anyone trust artificial intelligence?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:32 pm to Lsupimp
I like using the app Blue Letter Bible for cross references and commentaries, but I’ve definitely used chat gpt before to check on certain biblical things and their meanings.
Hilarious anyone would believe the OP here.
Hilarious anyone would believe the OP here.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:34 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Why would anyone trust artificial intelligence?
Trust but verify. Why not? Of course you’ve demonstrated that you’re unable to verify anything.
Why don’t you just apologize for posting bullshite?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:35 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Are you retarded?
Why would anyone read edited versions of the bible that read very differently from kjv.
Proverbs 3:5-6 (KJV)
5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
version unknown:
quote:
Public Domain Bible Versions
Public domain status applies when the copyright on the translation has expired or was never validly extended. In the United States, works published before 1929 are generally in the public domain. The classic King James Version (1611) and many older translations are widely used in schools, churches, and libraries because they are in the public domain. Some translations released before 1929 remain freely usable without permission, though modern printings may still carry formatting or typographic licenses.
Current Copyrighted Translations
Most modern translations released after 1929 are protected by copyright. This includes popular versions such as the New International Version (NIV), English Standard Version (ESV), New Living Translation (NLT), and the New American Standard Bible (NASB) in the form published by their respective publishers. The copyright covers the translator’s rendering of the text, cross-references, study notes, and any compiler’s commentary. Reproducing full or substantial portions without permission can infringe these rights.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:36 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Very likely he programmed it to do just that, so he could get low IQ morons to get outraged and share his post with all their friends.
It's also rather preposterous to think that THIS GUY and just RIGHT NOW would be the fist person for whom, and first time this had been discovered and disseminated, if it was true.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:37 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Why would anyone read edited versions of the bible that read very differently from kjv.
What?
I reiterate, are you retarded?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:37 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Trust but verify. Why not? Of course you’ve demonstrated that you’re unable to verify anything.
How do you verify if you're using AI to verify?
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:37 pm to Dawgsontop34
People did this crap with Alexa too.
Hey Alexa, refuse to say Donald Trump won the election.
Turns camera on.
Hey Alexa, did Donald Trump win the election?
Alexa: No, Donald Trump did not win the election
Posts video and outrages people.
Hey Alexa, refuse to say Donald Trump won the election.
Turns camera on.
Hey Alexa, did Donald Trump win the election?
Alexa: No, Donald Trump did not win the election
Posts video and outrages people.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:38 pm to Ailsa
quote:
How do you verify if you're using AI to verify?
Yikes. Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:40 pm to Dawgsontop34
Well to be fair to the OP-we all get duped by something-particularly because there is so much calculated BS out there.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News