
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Carney says partnership with CCP is much less of a security risk than with the U.S.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:48 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:48 am
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:50 am to Bunk Moreland
He must be pissed we killed so many of his fishing buddies
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:51 am to Bunk Moreland
Canada is a greater threat to us than Iran
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:51 am to Bunk Moreland
Well... he is a communist, so that tracks
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:52 am to Bunk Moreland
Pushing away one of our closest allies and most important trading partners to ultimately strengthen the CCP would be such a historic political failure.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:55 am to Bunk Moreland
Well, yeah, of course he would say something stupid like that. It’s already proven that almost half if not, half of the legislature is influenced by or straight up compromised by China
So yeah, it’s a “security risk“ for China if they partnered with the US and non-risk for Canada
So yeah, it’s a “security risk“ for China if they partnered with the US and non-risk for Canada
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Good grief you have mental issues
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pushing away one of our closest allies and most important trading partners to ultimately strengthen the CCP would be such a historic political failure.
Exactly! Trump made it political wisdom for a Canadian politician to be combative with the USA. He also threw the Canadian election to the leftists when the conservatives were poised to win. An historic blunder.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:01 am to Penrod
quote:
An historic blunder.
Nimrod
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pushing away one of our closest allies and most important trading partners to ultimately strengthen the CCP would be such a historic political failure.
It’s been absolutely wild, to see the man who’s “the toughest on the Chinese and Communism”, give more power and strength to the Chinese, than any other US president.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pushing away one of our closest allies
Were, they have hardly been a good ally for a while now. Unless you are for a globalist centric shift from our Northern neighbor?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:03 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Good grief you have mental issues
Canada is one of our closest allies and most important trading partners.
Having them become a closer ally to China and strengthening China with that trade, while we lose the close alliance and a chunk of our trade, would be bad for the US.
How can you spin that potential scenario any other way? The US becomes weaker, loses one of our closest allies, suffers in trade, and our #1 geopolitical enemy becomes a lot stronger.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:03 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Carney says partnership with CCP is much less of a security risk than with the U.S
Seems like one of us should leave NATO then
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:03 am to Bunk Moreland
Let Canada have what Canada wants. I'm sure in January 2029 they will completely change their opinion anyway.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:03 am to Strannix
quote:
Nimrod
And there you have peak Strannix posting.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:04 am to JellyRoll
quote:
Were, they have hardly been a good ally for a while now.
They have reacted to Trump's trade war but were a very close and good ally prior to that.
quote:
. Unless you are for a globalist centric shift from our Northern neighbor?
The G-word doesn't really apply to this discussion
China opposes most forms of the G-word and the US-Canada relationship itself would be hard to spin as "globalist"
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:06 am to sta4ever
quote:
It’s been absolutely wild, to see the man who’s “the toughest on the Chinese and Communism”, give more power and strength to the Chinese, than any other US president.
His Canada handling was horrible, but your statement is way off base. Trump has led a bipartisan turnaround on China which has stranded China and put the brakes on its development. Did you notice that Trump’s first term tariffs on China were criticized but kept in place by Biden? The ones from this term will be too.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The G-word doesn't really apply to this discussion
China opposes most forms of the G-word and the US-Canada relationship itself would be hard to spin as "globalist"
It does apply because Carney is all about that. His pivot to China is to gain access to trade he has fricked up with the U.S., and most likely on purpose. His main goal is for a globalist future.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Is the trade "fair"
Does not seem so
Does not seem so

Popular
Back to top

11













