- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 5:41 pm to Azkiger
Posted on 10/24/25 at 5:41 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Would you still be glazing her if she didn't?
I followed her last year and the year before about as much as I do now. I don’t necessarily go out of my way per se but since she triggers grown men I kind of get interested in what all the hullabaloo is all about.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 5:59 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Why does Candace deserve a Lawsuit?
Stating for a fact that the wife of French President Macron is a transgendered male. I mean it's a funny meme, but come on now. She took it to far and is going to pay the price. She is lucky Trump doesn't sue her for accusing him of being associated with Charlie Kirk.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:04 pm to 3down10
quote:
No, you are just looking for a reason to cancel people you don't agree with.
quote:
There is no reason to cop out for them. Joe Rogan thinks the moon landing was fake, which I think is really dumb. That doesn't mean everything he says is wrong or that he should be canceled and his career ended.
If that’s true it doesn’t mean we should give him any credence because he is “asking questions.” It’s a logical fallacy utilized by the intellectual inferiors.
quote:
Jet fuel can't melt steel. That's not a question, that's a statement of fact.
Chef’s kiss!!!
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:05 pm to 3down10
quote:
Jet fuel can't melt steel. That's not a question, that's a statement of fact. And before you start citing the lower temperatures required to weaken them. Make sure you also take into account that the steel needs to be under a constant fuel source for extended periods of time before that happens because the heat has to penetrate. Furthermore make sure you take into account the temperatures beside the fire are no where near the tops of the fires which is the temperatures you are going to cite. As such, a floor beam could weaken over many hours, but an actual support column is not. Additionally, the steel beams on the lower floors were not weakened. And since the majority of the mass from the building flew away from the building, you can't turn around and claim it was the weight of the floors falling down.
So beautiful. So what happened? Be specific. Don’t just “ask questions”.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:24 pm to Westbank111
Totally agree. Governments are capable of doing some evil stuff. We know the CIA was involved in JFK's assassination. Mossad's capabilities are just much as the CIA. The exploding Pagers, etc were ingenius...scary smart. I am no ballistics expert nor do I have a military background, but I think the current narrative is BS. A 30 06 would have done far more damage, and you'll never convince me his neck
" was made of steel amd stopped the 30 06 round" as stated by the doctor. Plus the scripted texts between Robinson & his furry buddy is laughably fake. How did he get the rifle on the roof? Where is the rifle when he's jumping off the roof? Did he re-assemble the Mauser on the roof and miraculously "return to zero" the sights for a precise neck shot? Then re-assemble the rifle only to leave it in the brush in the empty lot while fleeing? C'mon. The guy in the stairwell looks different than Tyler. I also saw where the Judge issued a gag order on everyone who attended the debate. How is he going to enforce that? Good luck. And why didnt the defense at least raise an objection to it? Finally, what about the Google history trend searches PRIOR to the rally on Robinson and the buildings on the UVU Campus? Check out the Redact Channel on YT on that one. I'll see if I can get the link.
There are so many things that just do not pass the "sniff test". I'm not sure of the level of Robinson's foreknowledge, etc., but I think he was the patsy on the act of the murder. I do think CK's security was in on it or at least part of them were.
I'm sure more will come out as well.
" was made of steel amd stopped the 30 06 round" as stated by the doctor. Plus the scripted texts between Robinson & his furry buddy is laughably fake. How did he get the rifle on the roof? Where is the rifle when he's jumping off the roof? Did he re-assemble the Mauser on the roof and miraculously "return to zero" the sights for a precise neck shot? Then re-assemble the rifle only to leave it in the brush in the empty lot while fleeing? C'mon. The guy in the stairwell looks different than Tyler. I also saw where the Judge issued a gag order on everyone who attended the debate. How is he going to enforce that? Good luck. And why didnt the defense at least raise an objection to it? Finally, what about the Google history trend searches PRIOR to the rally on Robinson and the buildings on the UVU Campus? Check out the Redact Channel on YT on that one. I'll see if I can get the link.
There are so many things that just do not pass the "sniff test". I'm not sure of the level of Robinson's foreknowledge, etc., but I think he was the patsy on the act of the murder. I do think CK's security was in on it or at least part of them were.
I'm sure more will come out as well.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:30 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
stop playing the victim.
I'm not the victim, you are just deflecting.
quote:
If that’s true it doesn’t mean we should give him any credence because he is “asking questions.” It’s a logical fallacy utilized by the intellectual inferiors.
He can be wrong and I can decide for myself.
It's funny you say logical fallacy consider how many you commit.
quote:
Chef’s kiss!!!
More deflection.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:32 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
So beautiful. So what happened? Be specific. Don’t just “ask questions”.
False dilemma. I do not need to provide all the answers in order to show that the official story is bullshite.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 6:52 pm to m2pro
quote:
You are correct. I am not your butler. You can choose to be objective and learn from her, instead of me.... but you won't.
It’s because you are full of it.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:01 pm to m2pro
quote:
You believe what mob mentality tells you to about her. You are not curious enough to investigate her content, thoroughly, on your own.
I actually believed she was an insufferable grifter before it was cool.
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:08 pm to Snipe
quote:
Candice Owen’s
Gives Loomer a run in the nuttier than squirrel shite category...
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:14 pm to Snipe
Not evil. Greedy.
Imo, some pro Palestinian group started funding her a couple years ago. It must've been a decent amount for her to skip covering most of the presidential election.
Imo, some pro Palestinian group started funding her a couple years ago. It must've been a decent amount for her to skip covering most of the presidential election.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:18 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I followed her last year and the year before about as much as I do now. I don’t necessarily go out of my way per se but since she triggers grown men I kind of get interested in what all the hullabaloo is all about
It’s pretty easy to see she’s just taking this angle as an opportunist.
There is a lot of people in the right wing podcasting space. What was she just going to do daily wire stuff after leaving the daily wire?
She’s being provocative to get clicks. To get the audience that likes this stuff.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:21 pm to 3down10
quote:
You can see the same thing with Alex Jones. He breaks a lot of true things, but then he's also got things that seem out there.
I’m not a fan of AJ, and truthfully don’t have the time to listen to him, but the things he says that you think “seem out there”…how do you REALLY know whether he’s wrong, right, or mostly right?
Truth is, you don’t have any idea. Even the most outlandish things he says might be true, but all it takes is a coordinated blitz saying he’s nutty and wrong to make people tune him out.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:24 pm to 87PurpleandGold
quote:
There are so many things that just do not pass the "sniff test". I'm not sure of the level of Robinson's foreknowledge, etc., but I think he was the patsy on the act of the murder. I do think CK's security was in on it or at least part of them were.
I said it was either a boomer or someone from the lbgt crowd.
And two people from those groups were arrested.
I’m not Nostradamus. I just paid attention the past 10 years. It was the most obvious thing.
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:24 pm to Snipe
No I dont listen to Candice Owens. Can you give us some actual context or do you really expect us to be outraged just because
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:27 pm to scottydoesntknow
She’s been trying to link Trump to it,
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:25 pm to dgnx6
quote:
It’s because you are full of it.
This isn't some "gotcha" moment for me with you. I'm not your enemy, brother.
I sincerely believe she has formed profound discovery for this case. Not just the case for or against Tyler Robinson, but further.
I don't care if you choose to detach your will to force the reality of this situation your way or not. I am not here to win you over. I am stating my opinion because I have learned that for far too long every country (the people) on earth is afraid to think independent of the collective. I have grown fully weary of any measure of trust with anyone feeding me information about anything in the political spectrum, or with regards to history or religion.
I believe few wish to control the many of us.
If I continue down this road and I feel Candace is a fraud, it will neither surprise me or cause me any failure of ego.
But her conclusions, as of now, feel nearest the mark for every source I've read about this particular case. Her and Ian Carroll.
I have changed so much with my world view and my views of the spiritual or metaphysical since my 20s it is unreal. I am not a Candace apologist, nor fan boy. I simply find her arguments compelling about this.
I suppose we all post to vent or to persuade, so I guess I do like to help more people see the way I do, in contrast to one of my points above.
I'll not comment any more about her in this thread.
I just would like to encourage you to question everything with an open mind, and consider looking into her videos about Charlie if nothing else. If not, cool.
Doubtless, you and I are BOTH on the side of justice for Charlie.
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:35 pm to GumboPot
quote:
interested in what all the hullabaloo is all about.
Just assume shes bitching about jew tunnels. You'll be right half the time.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:39 pm to riverdiver
quote:
I’m not a fan of AJ, and truthfully don’t have the time to listen to him, but the things he says that you think “seem out there”…how do you REALLY know whether he’s wrong, right, or mostly right?
Truth is, you don’t have any idea. Even the most outlandish things he says might be true, but all it takes is a coordinated blitz saying he’s nutty and wrong to make people tune him out.
I don't really listen to him either, just clips etc. But in general - it depends. Sometimes I can debunk things just with critical thought.
For example the Charlie Kirk thing. There is no reason for Trump or any other government agency to snipe him in public. He's not protected or anything, they can just make it look like a robbery etc. If you want examples, check out the Clinton's. The only reason someone would do it that way is if they just happen to know he will be at the event, and they hope they can get away with it.
Furthermore, what is the motive and gain? There isn't really any. Sure Charlie was questioning some things, the kind of thing some people in this thread would get upset about. But they don't just murder people for that, there are other methods.
So I mostly ignore it. Could it all be true? Sure, but it's much more plausible the nutter did it. Maybe he had ties and shite, I don't know.
At the other end - When it comes to 9/11, it's physics based. You can see the official story is bullshite. There is clear motive and gain, there is plenty of evidence and need for cover up etc. The official story doesn't hold water.
And then sometimes it just doesn't matter. I remember when AJ was talking about FEMA coffins or some shite. It never happened, but maybe it's what they were for and just never got used. I think maybe someone feed him BS info. Either way, there wasn't anything I could do and there was no real evidence for it. Waste of time.
Covid official story was bullshite from day 1. But some of the things people say wasn't true either. You gotta sift through the bullshite.
We landed on the moon, the evidence supports it.
The earth is round, you can prove it by looking at a sunset on a partly cloudy day.
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:42 pm to dgnx6
quote:
It’s pretty easy to see she’s just taking this angle as an opportunist.
There is a lot of people in the right wing podcasting space. What was she just going to do daily wire stuff after leaving the daily wire?
She’s being provocative to get clicks. To get the audience that likes this stuff.
The problem with this is she doesn't have to do this. She isn't making a name for herself here, she's getting attacked for it.
And if she just wanted to sell out for clicks and money, the DW and the Israel lobby would have showered her in money.
Popular
Back to top


2





