- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can Trump sue the House for false impeachment
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:02 pm
They impeached him on the premise that Trump was asking help from a foreign country on a political rival of Trump.
What rival?
It sure the hell isn't Biden.
Got it fixed. Duh on me.
What rival?
It sure the hell isn't Biden. Got it fixed. Duh on me.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:07 pm
21
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:02 pm to Homesick Tiger
False acquittal? Huh?
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:02 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
false acquittal
false acquittal?
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:05 pm to Homesick Tiger
Each group of letters you assembled is definitely a valid word, but where you failed is stringing those words together to make a coherent sentence.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:06 pm to Homesick Tiger
The House didn’t false anything. They truly accused him of a crime. The House presented him the charges. The Senate acquitted him. But not sure how you say there was a false acquittal
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:06 pm to Displaced
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:07 pm to Homesick Tiger
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:08 pm to Homesick Tiger
What was false about the impeachment? They did it and had a trial over it.
You can’t even say they false accusations because they accused him of the crime. The only thing false was their belief of guilt.
You can’t even say they false accusations because they accused him of the crime. The only thing false was their belief of guilt.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:10 pm to sms151t
quote:
What was false about the impeachment? They did it and had a trial over it.
He is saying that the motives listed are now shown to be moot.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:11 pm to sms151t
quote:
What was false about the impeachment?
You're making this harder than it was intended.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:15 pm to Homesick Tiger
I doubt it. Impeachment is political, and the power to impeach rests with the House at their discretion.
If Republicans win the House, they should impeach Pelosi and Schiff for abuse of power and obstruction of congress, though.
If Republicans win the House, they should impeach Pelosi and Schiff for abuse of power and obstruction of congress, though.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:16 pm to Homesick Tiger
No you just butchered your premise and I was trying to figure out where you were going.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:16 pm to Homesick Tiger
Maybe if he would've complied to prove his innocence. Why would you order witnesses not to testify unless you knew you had done something wrong? At the very least, he obstructed Congress. At worst, he is a traitor. Trading downvotes for facts btw so bring it on boys!
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:22 pm to DimTigerDontHate
quote:
At the very least, he obstructed Congress.
Facts?
Lol
Downvotes?
Hell yeah. Deranged progs get plenty.
prove his innocence?
You are a pedo and raped 1283 sheep and donkeys in the past 10 years. Prove your innocence. Dumbass commie.
You people are insane.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:24 pm to DimTigerDontHate
quote:
Maybe if he would've complied to prove his innocence.
In our justice system the accused doesn't prove their innocence.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:21 pm to roadGator
Yeah except for the fact that there are records of his crimes. The transcript proves his guilt. Add in the fact that he withheld the funds the same day of the phone call? Yeah, that's what he didn't want people testifying about. Also, I'd be amazed if you could define communism without having to Google it.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:23 pm to Homesick Tiger
Not worth it - keep the moral high ground and use it in November.
Only revenge worth having will be winning a 2nd term and (hopefully) winning back the House. Then appointing Amy Comey Barrett to replace RBG.
Only revenge worth having will be winning a 2nd term and (hopefully) winning back the House. Then appointing Amy Comey Barrett to replace RBG.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:28 pm to SirWinston
As if pubs have the moral high ground. Just look at the way your president disrespects every person who doesn't worship him. You're lying to yourself, buddy. Probably too much Facebook and fox news, it's not your fault. Love y'all as Americans but the echo chamber is real. Facebook, fox, the Donald, Breitbart, something everyone around here has in common.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:29 pm to SirWinston
Impeachment is a political process, not a legal process.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:30 pm to DimTigerDontHate
GFY ! Dimwit
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News