- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:10 pm to Homesick Tiger
Too bad he cant.
Ok. Lets subpoena witnesses.
Ok. Lets subpoena witnesses.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:19 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Lets subpoena witnesses.
You mean more than the 18 the House called and still couldn't put together a coherent case? How many more do you need?
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:22 pm to DimTigerDontHate
quote:a socialist hack with no knowledge of the law.
if he would've complied to prove his innocence
surely you have heard the term "innocent until proven guilty."
means only that a defendant has a presumption of innocence.
which is why the outcome of a trial is "not guilty." instead of "innocent."
Trump was not allowed any type of defense in the house chamber while the clown act was going on.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:49 pm to RazorBroncs
Typical, nothing constructive, just insults. How bout that moral high ground?
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:55 pm to s2
quote:He didn't allow his people to testify. If the truth would have worked as a defense for him, he would have let them testify. You are spouting Fox 'News' spin. That is not the reality of the situation. He absolutely was given an opportunity to defend himself. Also, without Google, what is the definition of Socialism? Guarantee you can't tell me without looking it up.
Trump was not allowed any type of defense in the house chamber while the clown act was going on.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:57 pm to Homesick Tiger
No. No he can’t. Why would you think that’s a possibility?
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:00 pm to CelticDog
quote:
hiding documentation and prevented witnesses from testifying
That’s called not complying with subpoenas, dumbass. If the house really wanted them they would have went to court instead of retracting the subpoenas, but they didn’t really want them because they know Trump did nothing wrong. Y’all are fricking idiots.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:03 pm to DimTigerDontHate
quote:
He didn't allow his people to testify
He doesn’t have too, innocent until proven guilty. If the house actually wanted them to testify they would have went to court. Once again, you have no idea how this works and you’re an idiot.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:22 pm to Rebel
quote:The Senate did not hear from Witnesses man, don't you remember that whole shitshow a few weeks ago? If you mean the House hearing, at least 4 white house staffers defied subpoena, with several more threatening to sue if ordered to testify, which would've had them tied up in court for years. I'm pretty sure that even Fox news reported on that one.
There were 18 witnesses and the Senate heard from 17 of them
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:27 pm to DimTigerDontHate
quote:
prove his innocence
Prove his innocence? How tyrannical of you.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 7:44 pm to DimTigerDontHate
They were never under an official subpoena because the impeachment inquiry wasn’t voted on yet. You need to go and do a little research before you post.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:22 pm to Charm299
No, sorry. You are wrong. Fox News Article
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:24 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:You know, like how O.J. did? Man that sure was tyranny.
Prove his innocence? How tyrannical of you.
Posted on 2/11/20 at 8:46 pm to DimTigerDontHate
Did you read the full article? Some showed up when they got an official subpoena not just a request. That’s where they trick the democratic sheep that listen to them. Trump told them not to go when it was just a request not under subpoena. After subpoena, he has every right to invoke executive privilege.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:53 am to Charm299
That is why they hold closed portions of the hearings. Claiming executive privilege in a closed hearing is an absolute joke.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:00 am to Homesick Tiger
Might be a good political distraction. Sue them and have them go ballistic for a couple months.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:09 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Can Trump sue the House for false impeachment
It's nothing more than an indictment by a grand jury.
Is there any other jurisdiction where you can sue a grand jury for an indictment they handed down, after the accused was acquitted?
This post was edited on 2/12/20 at 8:12 am
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:13 am to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Is there any other jurisdiction where you can sue a grand jury for an indictment they handed down?
The underlying gist of this thread has flown over some people's head.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:15 am to Homesick Tiger
No he can’t
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News