- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:31 pm to a want
quote:
Breaking: Trump Jr. and Manafort to testify publicly in Senate next week
So not gonna turn out the way you think it will. TRUMP JR. being witch hunt.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:33 pm to a want
quote:
With the oppo he received that day?
with whatever he wants. why do you think he agreed to a PUBLIC hearing?
Maybe so....so what will your reaction be if he shows up with opo research from that day that shows she had committed treason?
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:34 pm to a want
quote:
They sure as hell aren't intending to tell the truth.
you actually praised Obama for lying. Praised him for it.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:40 pm to a want
Do you ever get tired of failing?
This is 18mnths straight. Crazy
This is 18mnths straight. Crazy
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:41 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Do you ever get tired of failing?
This is 18mnths straight. Craz
He's a VICTIM!
Posted on 7/19/17 at 7:29 pm to a want
Who will display a greater level of memory deterioration in their testimony? Trump Jr., Manafort, or Sessions?
I honestly worry about the health of the people our president surrounds himself with, they all seem to be unable to recall much of anything that involves occurrences and contacts with a particular foreign adversary.
I honestly worry about the health of the people our president surrounds himself with, they all seem to be unable to recall much of anything that involves occurrences and contacts with a particular foreign adversary.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 7:51 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
If you're implying they're not targets, Archibald Cox allowed Haldeman, Erlichman, Dean all to testify before Congress. They still did time.
Tigerdoc = watergate afficiado
Posted on 7/19/17 at 8:06 pm to CptBengal
quote:Jesus. Bowden is the guy whose Russian lawyer was arrested and beaten to death. He spent years working for justice that resulted in the Magnitsky Act.
Both the Hermitage fund clown and the Fusion GPS stooge...both DNC hacks.
You have to be a real POS to pass him off as some partisan hack. He is actually a big critic of the Obama administration and Hillary.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 8:11 pm to a want
Do nothing burgers come w pickles? If not please add pickles to mine
Posted on 7/19/17 at 8:11 pm to a want
quote:
This is like a coach starting a QB then after completing 1-17 saying "It isn't his fault, he's never really thrown the ball before."
From your posts; no one believes you know anything sports.
Ok. Maybe tennis...
Posted on 7/19/17 at 8:44 pm to a want
What make you so confident those guys wouldn't lie under oath?
Im not confident an oath means much to them.
I wouldn't have Don Jr up , but since he is daddy lackey, I don't think he has much of a choice.
I can't wait for Kamala to tear his arse up verbally.
Im not confident an oath means much to them.
I wouldn't have Don Jr up , but since he is daddy lackey, I don't think he has much of a choice.
I can't wait for Kamala to tear his arse up verbally.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:00 pm to FooManChoo
It's like someone said at the end of the campaign last year: the left takes Trump literally but not seriously while the right takes him seriously but not literally. It's why his words are nitpicked to the extreme by the left while the right doesn't care because they get what he means.
While an interesting framing... I can help but think there are large portions on both sides that don't actually hear a word he says and are just on their teams bandwagon 100%
While an interesting framing... I can help but think there are large portions on both sides that don't actually hear a word he says and are just on their teams bandwagon 100%
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:21 pm to BBONDS25
Hah. Sorry, but it's clearly my responsibility to keep up your law chops.
I definitely shouldn't have said "probably" in my post to Gumbo-pot. It's obviously more of a "possibly". Here's the passage:
It's little prosecuted and a bit odd but the argument goes like this - if the papers in question were brought by Veselnetskya acting as an agent of the Russian government to influence DJT to repeal Magnitsky without her having registered under FARA then if Junior took them, it indicates a willingness to be influenced and thus might have violated the statute.
Here's a more thorough explication of the theory :
Foreign Policy
I definitely shouldn't have said "probably" in my post to Gumbo-pot. It's obviously more of a "possibly". Here's the passage:
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 957.Section 957 provides:
Whoever, in aid of any foreign government, knowingly and willfully possesses or controls any property or papers used or designed or intended for use in violating any penal statute, or any of the rights or obligations of the United States under any treaty or the law of nations, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
It's little prosecuted and a bit odd but the argument goes like this - if the papers in question were brought by Veselnetskya acting as an agent of the Russian government to influence DJT to repeal Magnitsky without her having registered under FARA then if Junior took them, it indicates a willingness to be influenced and thus might have violated the statute.
Here's a more thorough explication of the theory :
Foreign Policy
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Tigerdoc = Watergate afficianado
Guilty as charged. I have an an aunt who was working on Capitol Hill and my parents were training as journalists at the time and so I grew up being regaled by the exploits of Woodward and Bernstein and the drama of the Watergate hearings.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 9:45 pm to FooManChoo
Not intending to deceive?
What world are you on?
Trump Jr, lied from the start with this talking about adoption. He lied about who was there.
He then continued to lie on national tv when talking to Hannity.
He's a con man. Why even start lying if you know you didn't do anything wrong. Just this whole situation stinks. If this was done by the opposite party I bet you would reverse your thinking.
What world are you on?
Trump Jr, lied from the start with this talking about adoption. He lied about who was there.
He then continued to lie on national tv when talking to Hannity.
He's a con man. Why even start lying if you know you didn't do anything wrong. Just this whole situation stinks. If this was done by the opposite party I bet you would reverse your thinking.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:08 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
MsGarrison
There is no way your troll arse should be taken serious on anything.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:38 pm to StrongSafety
quote:
I can't wait for Kamala to tear his arse up verbally.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 10:52 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The Trumps ad lib like most Americans do and say stuff that may not be technically true but isn't an outright lie
So your contention is that it is ignorance I presume?
i.e. not intentionally lying but just saying whatever without being prepared to properly answer a question?
Posted on 7/19/17 at 11:57 pm to MsGarrison
I missed where it was confirmed that adoptions were not brought up. Seems like a really odd and specific thing to fabricate.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News