- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:36 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
frick yeah bro. You really showed us with that irrelevant chart.
He goes to the chart every time he does one of these "whoops, stepped on my own dick" threads.
For all practical purposes, they're his white flag.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:36 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Because Akhmetshin said Veselnitskya brought documents. (why couldn't they have sent agents with easier names??)
By your logic John McCain needs to be charged under the espionage act for the Trump dossier.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:38 pm to BBONDS25
You're right. It could be worse.
Or perhaps they'll pinch Loretta Lynch for directing James Comey to use euphemistic language with the press?
Or perhaps they'll pinch Loretta Lynch for directing James Comey to use euphemistic language with the press?
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:39 pm to MrLarson
1. He received the Dossier over the transom.
2. He gave it to the FBI.
2. He gave it to the FBI.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:40 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Please elaborate
I'll answer instead of downvote.
The special prosecutor case is way more "important," and therefore usually takes pole position on pursuing a case before a Congressional investigation.
The theory is that if someone has real pertinent information that the SP can use to indict or obtain testimony, they will block those individuals from testifying before Congress. In conclusion, people theorize that allowing them to testify means the SP doesn't see anything of value in what they have to say, ie no smoking gun.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:40 pm to a want
Will he troll with, "At this point, what difference does it make"? The melt would be glorious.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:41 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
He gave it to the FBI.
So?
He used foreign spies to obtain information against a political opponent of his.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:42 pm to a want
Panel II
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:45 pm to a want
This isnt good for Democrats agenda 
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:51 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
I'll answer instead of downvote.
Much appreciated
quote:
The theory is that if someone has real pertinent information that the SP can use to indict or obtain testimony, they will block those individuals from testifying before Congress. In conclusion, people theorize that allowing them to testify means the SP doesn't see anything of value in what they have to say, ie no smoking gun.
Thats definitely a pretty rational opinion especially for here. Guess we will ginf out soon enough
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:58 pm to oklahogjr
quote:See this is where I don't necessarily agree. There's a difference between lying to cover up something you don't want discovered and exaggerating or downplaying to get to the point or even talking off the cuff.
inability to tell the truth consistently
The Trumps are not politicians. Politicians typically weigh and measure every word they use and have their speech writers quadruple check everything to make sure they aren't in the wrong or put themselves with their backs against a wall. Even then they still do it from time to time.
The Trumps ad lib like most Americans do and say stuff that may not be technically true but isn't an outright lie because they aren't intending to deceive. At least that's my take. It's like someone said at the end of the campaign last year: the left takes Trump literally but not seriously while the right takes him seriously but not literally. It's why his words are nitpicked to the extreme by the left while the right doesn't care because they get what he means.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 5:59 pm to a want
quote:
quote:
A want is feverishly searching twitter looking at those random verified blue checks to tell him how this is bad for trump.
This cat has been reduced to an unbelievably pathetic person
Are you suggesting this isn't news?
It's not news on here at least. We've always known you were unbelievably pathetic.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:04 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Thats definitely a pretty rational opinion especially for here.
I agree, he'll probably be banned soon.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:17 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The Trumps ad lib like most Americans do and say stuff that may not be technically true but isn't an outright lie because they aren't intending to deceive.
They sure as hell aren't intending to tell the truth.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:18 pm to FooManChoo
quote:his reimagining the past are the ones that drive me crazy. Its on tape or video don why even bother lying?
There's a difference between lying to cover up something you don't want discovered and exaggerating or downplaying to get to the point or even talking off the cuff.
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:23 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The Trumps are not politicians. Politicians typically weigh and measure every word they use and have their speech writers quadruple check everything to make sure they aren't in the wrong or put themselves with their backs against a wall. Even then they still do it from time to time.
The Trumps ad lib like most Americans do and say stuff that may not be technically true but isn't an outright lie because they aren't intending to deceive. At least that's my take. It's like someone said at the end of the campaign last year: the left takes Trump literally but not seriously while the right takes him seriously but not literally. It's why his words are nitpicked to the extreme by the left while the right doesn't care because they get what he means.
This is like a coach starting a QB then after completing 1-17 saying "It isn't his fault, he's never really thrown the ball before."
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:23 pm to a want
Trump Jr. in opening statement:
"Now that I'm under oath, I will give you the full story. The Russians gave me extremely incriminating documents on Hillary, Obama, 27 Senators and 95 congressmen. We told the FBI about this but they weren't interested.
I have copies of these documents right behind me here in these twelve boxes. Shall we begin to read them into the record?"
"Now that I'm under oath, I will give you the full story. The Russians gave me extremely incriminating documents on Hillary, Obama, 27 Senators and 95 congressmen. We told the FBI about this but they weren't interested.
I have copies of these documents right behind me here in these twelve boxes. Shall we begin to read them into the record?"
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:26 pm to a want
quote:
This is like a coach starting a QB then after completing 1-17 saying "It isn't his fault, he's never really thrown the ball before."
So you're going with the Les Miles defense?That's a bold strategy Cotton.
This post was edited on 7/19/17 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 7/19/17 at 6:26 pm to Decatur
Panel II is legit.
Both the Hermitage fund clown and the Fusion GPS stooge...both DNC hacks.
Time to burn Clinton live on air
Both the Hermitage fund clown and the Fusion GPS stooge...both DNC hacks.
Time to burn Clinton live on air
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News