- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Kari Lake loses trial to overturn Arizona Governor election - Vows to appeal
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:43 pm to Bulldogblitz
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:43 pm to Bulldogblitz
A lot of naive people on here. You actually thought they would overturn this like they did with Trump right?
I’ve got some land to sell you
I’ve got some land to sell you
0
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:43 pm to philter
quote:
Yes there was. It's not anyone's job to summarize it for you, but they failed to follow their own regulations and az law in several areas.
If there are that many areas, it should be easy for you to name a couple, or are you just making stuff up now? I’m not talking about a sloppy process. I’m talking where they clearly did not follow AZ law or violated their own process.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:44 pm to Jack Carter
quote:
No Judge will put their career or safety on the line over this. It's easier and safer to just allow the cheaters to remain in power and collect a pay check
This right here... In this case they would had to have open and shut evidence.. Like someone openly admitting they cheated to have a new election.. These voters won't admit they were wrong but they will be punching their pillows at night..
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:45 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
Not sure I heard in any testimony Lakes witness say that its a mechanical failure that 19" ballots were printed on 20" paper . So , wtf is this Judge talking about? W
They likely got to the judge, dude. Or maybe he’s just establishment/left leaning like 90% of the judiciary.
This post was edited on 12/24/22 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:50 pm to Mickey Goldmill
The right decision here would be a one day election. Paper ballots. Hand counting. Each precinct would be done counting in about two hours once they close. Too many irregularities and voter confidence is worth protecting. Horribly gutless decision by the judge.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:52 pm to POTUS2024
quote:Let’s just repeat the election as many times as necessary to get the result you want, right?
The right decision here would be a one day election. Paper ballots. Hand counting. Each precinct would be done counting in about two hours once they close. Too many irregularities and voter confidence is worth protecting. Horribly gutless decision by the judge.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:53 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
No, it doesn’t lying. A false claim can be a lie, and it can also simply be incorrect. If you have your chance in court and can’t prove it, then it seems reasonable to call it false.
I disagree. It should be the job of the media to report. Not to render their own additional judgment or opinion within the context of a reported story.
Again, If they want to call it an editorial then fine. They do not do that. I did not read where the judge referred to Lake’s claim as “false”.
CNN chose to add their own description but did so without making sure readers understand. Why do readers need CNN to tell them a claim is “false”? Are readers not capable of drawing their own conclusions otherwise?
CNN could’ve reported the story without the added descriptor and the result of the story would’ve been the same. Is it CNNs job to punish Lake? Is it CNNs job to deter people from making what CNN deems “false claims”? Since when is this the responsibility of the media?
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:53 pm to TGFN57
quote:Too bad your dad didn't come out of the closet before knocking up that Denny's waitress that spawned you.
Another courts time and money wasted by cultists.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:54 pm to AggieHank86
quote:How about we just have one real election?
Let’s just repeat the election as many times as necessary to get the result you want, right?
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:56 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
quote:
Another courts time and money wasted by cultists.
Another cheap shot artist supporting the theft of the civil rights of millions of Americans
TGF aka tarzanas girl friend is a disgrace and embarrassment to this country
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:56 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
quote:
Another courts time and money wasted by cultists.
Too bad your dad didn't come out of the closet before knocking up that Denny's waitress that spawned you.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Next step after appeal is a recall petition.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:58 pm to Jack Carter
Realistically does anyone believe any of the current voting shenanigans will be corrected via court of law
Posted on 12/24/22 at 2:58 pm to VolcanicTiger
quote:
How about we just have one real election?
This. People show up, show an ID to confirm they’re who they say they are and that they’re on the voting role, and then they vote. Funny how there’s no controversy when they’re run that way.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:00 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
The right decision here would be a one day election. Paper ballots. Hand counting. Each precinct would be done counting in about two hours once they close. Too many irregularities and voter confidence is worth protecting. Horribly gutless decision by the judge.
I just don't see how this is in anyway a reasonable idea. Let's forget the logistical nightmare and impossibilities here for a second.
Why would a judge order the state to hold an election based on a newly made up set of rules? At most the judge could have asked for a recount under some circumstances then declare a winner or If an election was redone it would still follow the normal protocols.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Let’s just repeat the election as many times as necessary to get the result you want, right
That’s what politics have become. It’s just like football fans when your team loses, saying the refs costs them the game.
Your party wins an election- The system worked like it should
Your opponent wins- Election was stolen. Won’t accept it. Total fraud
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:03 pm to Bow08tie
quote:
Realistically does anyone believe any of the current voting shenanigans will be corrected via court of law
no, thus my comments
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The world they're building is not sustainable and most will be in poverty before they're old.
Progressives aren't smart enough to realize that these people are coming after them too, as soon as they're done manipulating them.
Problem is it will take generations if not centuries to undo this. If you look at catastrophic mis-steps in governance such as Cuba, North Korea, East Germany, Yugoslavia, China, USSR, Burma, Venezuela, Iraq, Iran...
Most had a run of at least 70 years of starving their populace. Many on that list are still going strong. When the "egalitarian peoples utopia" that ruled for 70+ years finally fell, it's not like they turned into Ron Desantis' Florida. East Germany reunited with Germany and lived sorta happily ever after. USSR slid into old fashioned autocracy, Yugoslavia had a decade of civil war and genocide, Iraq is a God forsaken mess...
Once they realize the unsustainable world is indeed unsustainable, they rule for another 50-70 years with secret police and internal military/militia keeping the starving populace in check.
Eventually the government is overthrown and another phase of nastiness ensues.
This post was edited on 12/24/22 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:05 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
I disagree. It should be the job of the media to report. Not to render their own additional judgment or opinion within the context of a reported story. Again, If they want to call it an editorial then fine. They do not do that. I did not read where the judge referred to Lake’s claim as “false”. CNN chose to add their own description but did so without making sure readers understand. Why do readers need CNN to tell them a claim is “false”? Are readers not capable of drawing their own conclusions otherwise? CNN could’ve reported the story without the added descriptor and the result of the story would’ve been the same. Is it CNNs job to punish Lake? Is it CNNs job to deter people from making what CNN deems “false claims”? Since when is this the responsibility of the media?
The claim is false. I’m sorry you don’t like that description, but it is correct. The media is correctly reporting the story. It’s not their job to sugarcoat it for people. It was a false claim, and it should be called as such.
Posted on 12/24/22 at 3:06 pm to dallastiger55
Page 5 of 45
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News