BREAKING - Intel IG determined the ‘whistleblower’ had ‘political bias’ against Trump

Color me shocked..

Hummm? Another one of them Peter Strzok fellas, eh?

gotta testify....

Ummm I'm biassed.
Shocker

Same ICIG that said this?

quote:

---

After receiving the Complainant? disclosure, the ICIG was required within 14 calendar days to determine whether the information alleged by the Complainant with respect to an urgent concern appeared credible.3 During that 14-day time period, the ICIG conducted a preliminary review of the disclosure. As a result of that preliminary review, I determined that the Complainant?s disclosure met the definition of an urgent concern, 119., a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of the law or Executive order, or deficiency relating to the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority of the Director of National Intelligence involving classi?ed information.?4 I also determined that there were reasonable grounds to believe that information relating to the urgent concern appeared credible.-

---

Sept. 9 letter from Intel Inspector General to House Intelligence on whistleblower complaint

Honestly there needs to be something done and justice isn’t doing a fricking thing. These fricks killed the stock market today, and likely for the next few weeks due to this bullshite. How is the President so powerless through all this

quote:

---

So did the IG say it was a reasonable concern or that there was political bias?

---

Yes

quote:

---

These fricks killed the stock market today

---

huh? It was down .5%, that's nothing

quote:

---

So did the IG say it was a reasonable concern or that there was political bias? We have two sides saying different things.

---

Based on the September 9th letter it looks to me like the "reasonable concern" determination was from the preliminary review. Now, after reviewing it further he is saying that it had political bias. Two things can be true and determinations change after more facts come to light.

It seems reasonable to me that the IG got the whistleblower complaint, it sounded urgent because it was trumped up nonsense, and he said it was urgent. I'm sure that the initial complaint said nothing about it being hearsay. Then after a further review brought to light that this person never actually heard the call and that he is being represented by a firm that is essentially paying people to lodge whistleblower complaints against Trump it makes sense the determination would change.

Political bias - no shite, Sherlock...