- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bovino just told reporters the suspect was on scene several minutes interfering...
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:55 pm to slackster
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:55 pm to slackster
quote:placed herself directly in the path of an officer, twice.
What was the woman doing to interfere? I haven’t seen anything one way or the other.
The second time she followed him across the street to do it. That's when she gets the "Chad shove" putting her arse on the ground like Rudy Ruettiger going against Willie Roaf.
And if you follow SFP's attempt at logic the ICE officer had no reason to cross the street, therefore he was not in performance of his duties and the whole interaction is illegal.
To that I say there is no Red Rover law that says Feds can't cross a street without a warrant or specifically to effect an arrest.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:56 pm to berrycajun
You calling these peaceful protestors rioters tells me all I need to know about your ability to process information.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah you crazies on the poles are making life bad for the people who aren't suffering from partisan brain rot
I loled. I bet you consider yourself a libertarian. Reality isn’t subjective.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:59 pm to Posstradamus
quote:
Broke no laws that I, a cum guzzling retard, recognize
We know bro, we know. Hope you enjoyed your "first foray" into this board ;)
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to I20goon
quote:
placed herself directly in the path of an officer, twice.
No rush but if you have some video or something I’d like to see it. Haven’t seen that yet. Thanks.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
wut
Going full on retard today I see.i know you don’t read others’ entire post before hitting reply but you don’t even read your own. Quit wasting people’s time dude.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to Posstradamus
Nobody has the right to obstruct and impede law enforcement in the act of enforcing the laws.
The guy who earned the dirt nap, and you and other pussy arse lunatics, can stand on the sidewalk well away from where they are doing their job. You can scream like little bitches, hold gay arse signs, blow fairy whistles, chant in unison , beat on drums, and otherwise act like the lunatics that you are. Had dirt nap boy had done that, he would be alive.
He did none of that though. Instead, he got in their way, impeded, obstructed, and interfered to the best of his little bitch made ability. He broke the rules of being a peaceful protester and chose to be a law breaking agitator. Wish you would have joined him!
The guy who earned the dirt nap, and you and other pussy arse lunatics, can stand on the sidewalk well away from where they are doing their job. You can scream like little bitches, hold gay arse signs, blow fairy whistles, chant in unison , beat on drums, and otherwise act like the lunatics that you are. Had dirt nap boy had done that, he would be alive.
He did none of that though. Instead, he got in their way, impeded, obstructed, and interfered to the best of his little bitch made ability. He broke the rules of being a peaceful protester and chose to be a law breaking agitator. Wish you would have joined him!
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Holy shite
Just following your lead if a right wing guy was killed in this situation.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:02 pm to Posstradamus
Interfering in federal operations is not peacefully protesting. In Baton Rouge the lefties stand on a busy corner with their signs in protest. They are peaceful protesters. They are not actively obstructing justice. It is illegal to get in the way of arrests - get in front of ice vehicles leaving to make arrests
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:03 pm to slackster
quote:
I honestly don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.
First of all Slack, as I have told you before, while we disagree on some things I think you are a honest broker.
Let me try this worded differently.
When a hostile and dangerous environment is created, a different set of rules are put into play and is allowed by the court.
Due to that, excessive-force claims must be judged based on the totality of the circumstances, including events leading up to the use of force, not only the split-second moment when force was used.
The window is no longer considered to be 2 to 3 seconds or in the moment. That was a 9-0 ruling by SCOTUS.
That should answer this:
quote:
I don’t see what dumbass Walz has to do with the actual facts of the case.
His words and all the actions listed in the OP are now actual facts of the case. Due to attacks on ICE during and after the list in the OP, the lives of the agents were at risk.
When this guy showed up and a gun was discovered, they immediately are now operating as he is there with intent to kill. Anything he does at that point that could be seen as him reaching for anything that could be a weapon, that man is dead.
That agent will not be put in jail. They can try to sue for wrongful death, but he had a friggin gun in a riot zone.
For me. I'm pissed. I'm pissed. This should have never happened and the ones that promoted these actions in leadership are the ones that SHOULD be held accountable.
Did that make it clearer?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:03 pm to Dirk Dawgler
Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer. His presence was not illegal.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. I'm here.
No, you are running from answering the question and I am loving that you are being exposed.
Name the time frame put in place by the SCOTUS.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to berrycajun
I'll be honest, I don't expect you bootlickers to look at this fairly. How can you while you have the boot all the way down your throat? Pretty feminine behavior.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to I20goon
quote:
the "Chad shove"
oh wow
quote:
And if you follow SFP's attempt at logic the ICE officer had no reason to cross the street, therefore he was not in performance of his duties and the whole interaction is illegal.
To that I say there is no Red Rover law that says Feds can't cross a street without a warrant or specifically to effect an arrest.
At the very least you have to concede these actions had nothing to do with illegal immigrants, at that point.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
And They don’t know that he was.
They warn the public and others about making speculations before all of the information is out. However, in the same breath, they do exactly what they tell others not to do.
I also don’t know for sure that he wasn’t a plant by Santa Claus
Jeez. They don't have to know.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:06 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Going full on retard today
wut
quote:
I see.i know you don’t read others’ entire post before hitting reply but you don’t even read your own. Quit wasting people’s time dude.
Bro why are you melting in the most random, flailing way?
I wasn't even meant to you and posted to you with respect, and you're just going full China Syndrome with random/weird ad homs
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:06 pm to Posstradamus
quote:
Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer.
Wow.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:07 pm to slackster
quote:
There is nothing disingenuous about that reply. Standing in the road blocking traffic changes nothing material about the events that lead up to him being shot.
You entered the thread with an opinion on what he deserved, then 10 pages later make a comment as if others are missing the nuance of an all or nothing blame game. Explain how that is not disingenuous.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:08 pm to BCreed1
quote:
No, you are running from answering the question and I am loving that you are being exposed.
Name the time frame put in place by the SCOTUS.
It's based on the incident. As I already said, likely from the shove, or, at most, when the LEO started crossing the street.
Popular
Back to top


2







