- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bondi Twitter trying to clean up the mess early this AM.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:22 am to Smeg
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:22 am to Smeg
quote:
She said "hate speech isn't protected", but it is.
She didn't mention anything about threats of violence.
Now that she's been called out she's trying to say "oh, I meant hate speech that includes threats of violence"
I'm surprised she'd reply at all, you'd think the AG would have actual work to do & care less about pedantic lib screeching
0
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:24 am to NC_Tigah
How is celebrating something that has already happened (Kirk’s assassination) inciting that thing which has already happened?
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:26 am to Radio One
You're as histrionic as a female.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:27 am to NC_Tigah
We spent the past 20 years of them saying everything they don’t like is hate speech. Biden made multiple speeches on it. They tried to form a Ministry of Truth to attack speech. They called any attack on them hate speech.
And here you are agreeing with them.
Hate speech is protected.
“They are Nazis” is protected
“They are Nazis and we must kill the Nazis” is not.
Bondi stepped in it bad.
And here you are agreeing with them.
Hate speech is protected.
“They are Nazis” is protected
“They are Nazis and we must kill the Nazis” is not.
Bondi stepped in it bad.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:27 am to mauser
quote:
You're as histrionic as a female.
This stings.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:28 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Incorrect.
Really yes
Sorry.
e.g., Hate speech is not protected when it incites lawless actions, represents a genuine threat, or is deliberately intended provoke an immediate violent reaction from the target.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:29 am to Smeg
quote:
She said "hate speech isn't protected", but it is.
Did you stop reading her tweet immediately after "hate speech." Maybe I'm the retarded one but is seems like the word THAT is important here.
Like say, you don't suck dick versus you don't suck dick THAT much.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:29 am to Radio One
She just blew it by using the phrase "hate speech" to describe threats. That rankled me,too.
Now she's providing her own narrow definition of the progressive term hate speech.
That was pretty dumb.
Now she's providing her own narrow definition of the progressive term hate speech.
That was pretty dumb.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:30 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Negative.
We spent the past 20 years of them saying everything they don’t like is hate speech.
We spent the past 20 yrs with them attempting to redefine WTF hate speech is.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:30 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
speech is not protected when it incites lawless actions, represents a genuine threat, or is deliberately intended provoke an immediate violent reaction from the target.
Corrected that for you. No need for the "hate" modifier preceding "speech".
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:34 am to Radio One
quote:Good God Almighty!
How is celebrating something that has already happened (Kirk’s assassination) inciting that thing which has already happened?
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:35 am to NC_Tigah
Expand on this for me.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:40 am to Radio One
She's a complete amateur. Trump should have been more selective. And not based it off of tits and arse
Posted on 9/16/25 at 7:52 am to Radio One
What this site needs is another real estate attorney turned constitutional law expert.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:03 am to Smeg
Yep.
"Hate speech" is not a defined term in U.S. federal law. People use the term "Hate speech" for speech that hurts feelings. There's just speech. Protected.
ETA: there is a thing called "discriminatory harassment" under Title VII, but I think of that more as employment law than a free speech thing.
Threats and speech to incite violence are NOT protected.
Bondi blew it by promoting that phrase.
"Hate speech" is not a defined term in U.S. federal law. People use the term "Hate speech" for speech that hurts feelings. There's just speech. Protected.
ETA: there is a thing called "discriminatory harassment" under Title VII, but I think of that more as employment law than a free speech thing.
Threats and speech to incite violence are NOT protected.
Bondi blew it by promoting that phrase.
This post was edited on 9/16/25 at 8:23 am
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:07 am to Radio One
This is the shite that led to the Brits not being able to speak out against immigration without being arrested.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:09 am to Henry Jones Jr
She’s Trumps attack chihuahua
She’s safe
She’s safe
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:10 am to Radio One
Enough of this bitch. She should have been fricking fired back in March. Easily Trump’s worst appointment and he should make Matt Gaetz the interim AG for the next 15 months. Pam Bondi is more interested in being a media whore anyway, so just have them switch jobs.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:12 am to Radio One
quote:
Follow Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. It’s a crime. For far too long, we’ve watched the radical left normalize threats, call for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That era is over.
Fascinating.
Stop enabling rapists.
Posted on 9/16/25 at 8:13 am to NC_Tigah
Who defines what hate speech is?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News