- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bondi responds! Boasberg gonna cry!
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
they told you leftards go frick yourselves 
0
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
smaller government.
Like the one that sued Texas for trying to secure it's border?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:go frick yourself you dishonest hack
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Bro, this will be a long 4, 8, or 12 years for you to deal with. Pace yourself.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:47 am to jizzle6609
quote:
Holding yourself to a higher standard only works for so long before things require action.
It only works at all when both sided have moral standards = hence Franklin's admonition at the close of the Constitutional Congress ===
"We have given you a constitution for the governance of a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."
We are dealing with political adversaries who have no moral standards at all - they are only devoted to the accumulation of political power - not to enhance the conditions of the nation, but to accumulate more personal power for themselves. They only motivation is to be the equivalent of a
queen ant in an ant hill.
This has been their trajectory since LBJ - and Clinton/Obama really set the action in motion.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In others, a Trump administration official admits that there is little specific evidence tying some deportees to any crime—and then, incredibly, argues that the lack of evidence should be taken as proof of criminality.
That's not what the Trump administration said. You can't seem to understand that the government lawyer saying "highlights the risk they pose" does not equal "proof of criminality" as claimed in your link. You love telling us how adept you are at nuance, yet, when it's in your benefit, you become willfully dumb, like when you stupidly try to convince us that lawfare doesn't exist and globalism means free trade.
If that argument is valid, that no one can be treated as a threat without a criminal record, then it nullifies the RICO statute. Under that law, you do not have to be caught committing criminal acts to be found guilty, only associated with a criminal organization.
So which is it? No one can be treated as a criminal without direct proof of a crime even when they are part of a criminal organization or we should overturn all convictions based on RICO charges?
You can't have it both ways.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
Hey Blowhard, I don't know the legalese so just plain “Go frick yourself”.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We don't even know if all of the people taken are TDA
The article you linked states that the people taken were with TDA members when they were arrested. One of the cases cited as an example of potential non-TDA members unfairly targeted is two people in the same car with TDA members during an FBI gun bust. Sure, they were committing crimes with known TDA members but those two didn't have their TDA membership cards on them so we don't know if they are actually TDA. Stating the legal arguments for deportation are "laughably weak" and then citing that as an example is itself laughably weak.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:55 am to SippyCup
quote:
Seems like the prior administration did the same and not a peep from any judge.
Yea but we can't talk about that.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:55 am to RollTide4547
Boasberg became picayune so Bondi wins…..
Roberts needs to get on the side with out conflicts of interest and TDS…..
Roberts needs to get on the side with out conflicts of interest and TDS…..
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If we have no judicial oversight/recourse, what happens when a citizen is labeled a "terrorist" and then put on a plane in the middle of the night and shipped off to a Central American jail? Do they just have to grin and bear it?
I believe this is what your comrades refer to as a whataboutism
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If we have no judicial oversight/recourse, what happens when a citizen is labeled a "terrorist" and then put on a plane in the middle of the night and shipped off to a Central American jail? Do they just have to grin and bear it?
Does this citizen have their face, chest, and back covered in tattoos which advertise their gang affiliation and number of murders and rapes committed????
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Because a single district court judge in a single jurisdiction can dictate national security. Got it.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:04 am to SlowFlowPro
What is a straw man.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a laughably weak argument. Cerna is arguing that the Trump administration has the power to deport any ILLEGAL immigrant suspected of having ties to the Tren de Aragua gang, even if the evidence is thin and never proven in any court
Ties to tren de agua or not, WGAF? THEYRE CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING.
You think you, as a US citizen, show up in some bumfrick country without a visa, and upon being detained, you expect to get a trial which may determine you can stay? On what basis? GTFO (and GTFO).
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:09 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
I believe this is what your comrades refer to as a whataboutism
not, that’s not a counter allegation.
thats a directly related possible outcome.
Whataboutism is when 7 posters in this thread said “oh but the courts were silent when Biden did it!”
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When?
When they failed to enforce our immigration laws and left the border wide open.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:09 am to SlowFlowPro
SlowFanniePro is big mad
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Now the Trump admin is arguing any further inquiry is "national security"
See the issue?
No, I and others, do not see the issue. All of Trump's actions are supported by law, the Constitution, which has been presented numerous times in every thread about this topic.
If you don't like it, there are procedures for you and these Marxist judges to amend the Constitution. Amend away!!!!
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:12 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
All of Trump's actions are supported by law, the Constitution, which has been presented numerous times in every thread about this topic.
when someone challenges that you can’t just ignore the court.
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News