- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boebert: it’s WAY darker than anyone imagined,
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:20 am to grizzlylongcut
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:20 am to grizzlylongcut
Irrelevant to the discussion
0
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:29 am to South21
quote:
This will never happen as it is against the law.
Photos of Hunter Biden were published. Him with children, appropriately censored. That creep was a child fricker. They can do the same with Epstein photos. People need to be disgusted and sickened. Sickened enough to want to do everything possible to punish and prevent.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:46 am to GumboPot
Name names, start questioning people listed, do fricking something besides talk!!
That’s all it ever is talk and no one is ever held accountable.
Our government does the same thing over and over. I hate both parties.
That’s all it ever is talk and no one is ever held accountable.
Our government does the same thing over and over. I hate both parties.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 4:49 am to AlterEd
quote:
Irrelevant
The reputation of the person making outrageous claims is always relevant.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:15 am to KLSU
quote:
Name names, start questioning people listed, do fricking something besides talk!!
If something was actually done it would take away a political football and politicians love political footballs.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:21 am to Turnblad85
A homeless crackhead could speak “outrageous “ truths and they’d still be true. If they are. The evidence is what matters and not the source.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:24 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
homeless crackhead could
Yeah, "could".
But it's not worth my time to listen to the other 99% of bullshite.
But you continue to stand on the street corner with bewildered eyes listening to hobos fill your mind with enchanting stories :lol
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:36 am to Morgus
quote:
I don't believe for a minute that anyone was "eating kids."
I don't think it's beyond the realm of possibility.
People who have everything, lack nothing and can snap their fingers to have every desire fulfilled... can easily get bored and twisted.
It's like any other addiction, chasing highs in ever more extreme ways.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:48 am to Morgus
quote:
I don't believe for a minute that anyone was "eating kids." FFS cannibalism is EXTREMELY, EXTEMELY fricking rare. Even in the poorest nations where starvation is commonplace, we see very, very few cases of cannibalism. It's a taboo that spreads across nearly all cultures in all recorded history. And our natural revulsion towards it has an undeniably strong genetic component. Even finding this stuff on the dark web is incredibly fricking rare.
But somehow we see dozens and dozens of people talking about eating humans through fricking gmail???
No.
You know what else is extremely taboo, hanging paintings of dead kids all over the walls of your house. Yet...
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:53 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Well I’m not gonna fall for it this time just because Boebert is a Republican. Show the proof or shut up about it.
No shite. Congresspeople are some of the least credible people alive.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:55 am to Morgus
quote:
I don't believe for a minute that anyone was "eating kids." FFS
Pictures on X. Doesn’t look like AI.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:58 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Congresspeople are some of the least credible people alive.
Also true.
Only class of people I can think of that have a legal pass to deceive.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 5:58 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
The evidence is what matters and not the source.
Ok. So name names.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:01 am to Gifman
quote:
If something was actually done it would take away a political football and politicians love political footballs.
You may have hit the nail on the head here.
Every member of Congress who gets to see the files probably walks away from the experience and immediately starts trying to play the, “Vote for my pork bill and I’ll make sure your name (or your owners’ names) stays redacted”, card.
That’s why the “Free Beer Tomorrow” theater continues. They all have each other by the balls.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:07 am to Cosmo
Yall going to shite once you find out Zion Don being eating kids.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:20 am to cardswinagain
quote:
Why aren’t people in handcuffs?
Because this administration is complicit is why.
If you or I were busy diddling kids, we’d be in jail with no bail today. How any of you people can defend this admin right now is crazy.
We joke that VOR and cubbies and nawlinstiger are groomers but perhaps it’s our very own people who have turned a blind eye to justice.
And Pam, get fricked. There are “more important things” to be talking about?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:25 am to Jasharts77
Retard
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:26 am to Morgus
quote:
But somehow we see dozens and dozens of people talking about eating humans through fricking gmail???
Then explain to us why those certain terms were used in dozens and dozens of emails. Terms that are known to be used to reference exactly what your denying to be possible.....
While your at it, explain the same situation in "Pizza Gate" .....
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:31 am to cardswinagain
quote:
Why aren’t people in handcuffs?
Because we have a BIG talk, no bite president. Sure, if you were a female, he is tough enough to call you fat or a loser, but zero bite, even to the people who tried to put him in jail.
Orange poodle
Posted on 2/12/26 at 6:32 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Because this administration is complicit is why.
If you or I were busy diddling kids, we’d be in jail with no bail today. How any of you people can defend this admin right now is crazy.
We joke that VOR and cubbies and nawlinstiger are groomers but perhaps it’s our very own people who have turned a blind eye to justice.
And Pam, get fricked. There are “more important things” to be talking about?
It becomes more clear to me every day that someone has Trump by the balls. There are a lot of different reasons that could be. Doesn’t mean he’s complicit. Maybe he is? Maybe Israel is threatening to nuke someone if the full files are released? Maybe someone is threatening to blow up the economy if the full files are released? I’m not sure we will ever know the real answer.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News