Started By
Message

re: Beto: White Americans Don't Know Full Story of Slavery

Posted on 6/15/19 at 11:57 am to
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
4701 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 11:57 am to
So, my people were slaves about 2500 years ago. Does that make me an expert on slavery?
The word slaves comes from “Slav” as the Slavs were slaves to romans and indo-Europeans. They were also white. Evidently any Slav would be an expert on slavery.
Many Irish came over as indentured servants, would they know the story of slavery? They’re white also.
Posted by Falco
Member since Dec 2018
1243 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 11:58 am to
Slavery has existed since ancient Mesopotamia, these people act like it only happened in America. frick it is still happening in parts of Africa
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:04 pm to
Gonna go with cuck
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:06 pm to
“Wash my balls” doesn’t go over so well.
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Wonder if Beto knows which President segregated the military? Wonder if he knows which party fought integration in the schools?


Party isnt indicative of ideology or identity politics. That's why this point is usually mute.

Up until the 1970s, the Democrats were the conservative party. This is well documented by the politicians themselves. Likewise, Republicans had the liberals.

Democrats have always used class warfare and identity politics. The Republicans were always for business growth and lower taxes.

The tactics are the same, how they are used and for whom is different.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:07 pm to
quote:


I wish there had never been any slaves in America


Not me. I just wish they had all been Asians.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:15 pm to
quote:


Up until the 1970s, the Democrats were the conservative party.


Liar
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16210 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:20 pm to
Why the frick is he trying to pretend that he is a representative of all white people ? If he doesn't know something, then "white people " don't know something.

It's always the whitest fricking liberals that pretend to represent all white people.

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80096 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:26 pm to
But...but...he rides a SKATEBOARD!
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Democrats seized upon a way of ingratiating themselves to western voters: Republican federal expansions in the 1860s and 1870s had turned out favorable to big businesses based in the northeast, such as banks, railroads and manufacturers, while small-time farmers like those who had gone west received very little. Both parties tried to exploit the discontent this generated, by promising the little guy some of the federal largesse that had hitherto gone to the business sector. From this point on, Democrats stuck with this stance — favoring federally funded social programs and benefits — while Republicans were gradually driven to the counterposition of hands-off government.


From a business perspective, Rauchway pointed out, the loyalties of the parties did not really switch. "Although the rhetoric and to a degree the policies of the parties do switch places," he wrote, "their core supporters don't — which is to say, the Republicans remain, throughout, the party of bigger businesses; it's just that in the earlier era bigger businesses want bigger government and in the later era they don't."



quote:

In other words, earlier on, businesses needed things that only a bigger government could provide, such as infrastructure development, a currency and tariffs. Once these things were in place, a small, hands-off government became better for business.


why the parties switched platforms

Again, not saying it was a Southern Strategy, but it was a shift in ideologies.
This post was edited on 6/15/19 at 12:36 pm
Posted by SlidellTiger
Madisonville, La
Member since Jan 2004
1440 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:35 pm to
Perhaps Beto can inform white people / he is a expert in slavery matters
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

White Americans Don't Know Full Story of Cultural Marxism and Communist Socialism



FI.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146689 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:40 pm to
Puto Roberto is an idiot. I would pay money for someone to ask him live in a debate about the black slave owner in SC.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:44 pm to
I would bet my house that if one tested ANY random selection of 100 white people vs 100 black people on the history of slavery, the white group would destroy the black group.

In all likelihood, they would score at least twice as well.

Shut the frick up Beto
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50277 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:45 pm to
More&Les wins this thread....

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:


Up until the 1970s, the Democrats were the conservative party

This never gets less stupid no how frequently it is repeated.

Sheesh.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:47 pm to
quote:


Again, not saying it was a Southern Strategy, but it was a shift in ideologies


FDR and LBJ weren't conservatives and their REPUBLICAN opponents weren't liberals

You're retarded of you buy this EXTREMELY cherry picker bull shite
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50277 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 12:48 pm to
Followed up by the inevitable "they switched strategies and parities" article written by some idiot Progressive that has never met a minority in their life.

This is another bit of propaganda the left has mastered. Have to hand it to them for that history being rewritten and bought by millions of dumb Americans.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Followed up by the inevitable "they switched strategies and parities" article written by some idiot Progressive that has never met a minority in their life.

It's such an insanely stupid leftist belief.

Democrats were there party of massive government social programs in 1930 and they are the party of even MORE massive such programs now.

And. Their opponents from 1930 are STILL their opponents

Race shite isn't the only thing in politics AND even only looking at that....... Isn't it interesting that they people who believe the "switch" occurred still take credit for all the liberal shite from prior to 1970 that they LIKE?

Sorry libs. If you love the new deal and believe in the switch, you can't take credit for the new deal!
Posted by volod
Leesville, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 6/15/19 at 1:01 pm to

quote:


This never gets less stupid no how frequently it is repeated. 

Sheesh.


Do you honestly believe white Southerners pre 1970 would ever be the ones talking about interracial/gay marriage equality and civil rights for non-whites?

The disconnect you have is because the 2 party system is a lie.

Southern Conservatives - Americas third party


quote:


Our constitution was shaped by a troubling contradiction born of political necessity. Our founders were forced to develop a political framework capable of encapsulating a Caribbean slave economy inside a wider classical-liberal project. From that effort emerged a governing framework that allowed the slave states to preserve their peculiar institutions. Influenced by their essentially defensive posture, slave states developed a highly insular brand of conservatism under a monolithic, single-party system.



quote:

Southern conservatism presumes the existence of a natural, inherited hierarchy. As Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens explained in his criticism of the US constitutional order, “They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.”
Southern conservatism finds freedom and equality, by its unique definitions, through adherence to a social hierarchy based on race, Christianity, a male duty to protect women, and a commodity-driven economy. Though they have always been intensely hostile to government intervention in markets, this should never be interpreted as an affinity for capitalism, which they have always found to be grubby and low. Few forces are more disruptive of a perfect social order than the constant, churning creative destruction that accompanies capitalism.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram