- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are they not scared of losing in Nov or is it they are?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:14 pm to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:14 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:\
I do budget my time wisely - and I have wasted far too much with you. If you ever have a rational thought - try to post it - someone may actually react positively. And as a wise man once said = "Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty and the pig likes it."
THIS!
0
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:17 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
quote:
I'm capable of actually arguing points and not grasping at saying everything is rigged and everything is corrupt.
==========================
No kid... you aren't.
they got nuttin' - but think they've just unlocked the secret of the universe.
I think it's time to raise the age of adulthood to 35 or something - or at least require that someone exhibits a healthy understanding of logic and proof.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:24 pm to Jjdoc
He’s too fricking stupid jj to see if he clicked on one link there was 10 links within that link. I put it all in one so I so not have to keep Re posting all those links over and over for idiots like him. Plus the here is the evidence link has HUNDREDS OF LINKS within that hyperlink.
Ya know how I can tell he never clicked on a single link? The fact he keeps claiming there was only one link. Lololol.
Ya know how I can tell he never clicked on a single link? The fact he keeps claiming there was only one link. Lololol.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:29 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
they got nuttin' - but think they've just unlocked the secret of the universe.
He is, she is... it is.. whatever the thing identifies as, has too many slip ups. We know this is a young person due to language.
We know it's either an alter or a banned person due to it saying things about the people on board.
It has no logic. It has no real world experience and it's evident in it's posts.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:29 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
He’s too fricking stupid jj to see if he clicked on one link there was 10 links within that link. I put it all in one so I so not have to keep Re posting all those links over and over for idiots like him. Plus the here is the evidence link has HUNDREDS OF LINKS within that hyperlink.
Ya know how I can tell he never clicked on a single link? The fact he keeps claiming there was only one link. Lololol.
Exactly. IT is ignorant.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:31 pm to Jjdoc
They are going to lose.
They don't care because this is all by design. We don't get long stretches of party rule because it means things are working and less money goes into the political machine.
There is zero reason for politicians to improve things.
They don't care because this is all by design. We don't get long stretches of party rule because it means things are working and less money goes into the political machine.
There is zero reason for politicians to improve things.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:37 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
It has no logic. It has no real world experience and it's evident in it's posts.
Lmao.
You've provided no evidence and instead you continue to grasp at things.
I've got enough experience to know that Biden won the election.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:40 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
He’s too fricking stupid jj to see if he clicked on one link there was 10 links within that link. I put it all in one so I so not have to keep Re posting all those links over and over for idiots like him. Plus the here is the evidence link has HUNDREDS OF LINKS within that hyperlink.
I clicked your dumb link about the Pennsylvania election. That's the one I clicked.
But in any case, I've debunked your claim about there being 20,000 votes. You've instead tried to grasp at straws about the county being corrupt and machines being scrubbed when non-Maricopa-county officials have confirmed the same.
I'm not going to debunk anything else because you'll just accuse them of being corrupt as well.
I've now clicked your link linking to another thread and none of those links seem to show actual fraud (instead, they show allegations and claims of whistleblowers).
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:42 pm to drdanger605
Lol.
You never read a single link among hundreds within the hyperlinks and could never disprove any claims those links made. You spin shite with word salad to avoid calling it fraud.
Run back to dem underground punk kid troll alter. Your time is up here.
You never read a single link among hundreds within the hyperlinks and could never disprove any claims those links made. You spin shite with word salad to avoid calling it fraud.
Run back to dem underground punk kid troll alter. Your time is up here.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:51 pm to Jjdoc
2
Unfortunately, the dims, are way ahead of conservatives when it comes to cheating.
“An Arizona judge has rejected Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s request that he order Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to do a major rewrite of Arizona’s election rules. Friday’s ruling from Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper leaves a manual approved in 2019 as the guide for the 2022 elections.”
Unfortunately, the dims, are way ahead of conservatives when it comes to cheating.
“An Arizona judge has rejected Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s request that he order Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to do a major rewrite of Arizona’s election rules. Friday’s ruling from Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper leaves a manual approved in 2019 as the guide for the 2022 elections.”
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:51 pm to Fat Bastard
Well, I've already debunked your Arizona claim.
I've now clicked it and it links to a bunch of right-wing newspapers.
I'll start debunking them:
One of the links talks about Michael Gableman (a guy who risks being disbarred for making false accusations).
His claims were debunked and he risks consequences for his false claims.
LINK
The post about Mark Zuckerberg doesn't even show the thing you claimed it did as well. It doesn't show voter fraud and it talks about this being found in the Wisconsin report (run by none other than discredited Michael Gableman).
So that's two debunked claims as well made by the same discredited Gableman.
Next, onto the Maricopa County claim, I've already debunked that above.
The Yuma County School Board claim is debunked here:
LINK
So let's get this thing straight.
Two of your claims were made by someone who was found in contempt of court and risks being disbarred for making false claims.
The other claim doesn't show wide-spread voter fraud in the slightest.
I suggest you should run along. I've demonstrated once again that your claims are incredibly spurious and made by people who have been discredited by their own profession.
So nice try. I knew it was going to be exhausting trying to rebut all your false claims and I'm sure you'll respond with some inane claim that even courts and the Wisconsin bar are corrupt.
I'm sure you're going to link spam more links. I'm not going to bother rebutting them because I know they'll be easily rebutted like the sample you gave above and I've got more time in the world.
quote:
You never read a single link among hundreds within the hyperlinks and could never disprove any claims those links made. You spin shite with word salad to avoid calling it fraud.
I've now clicked it and it links to a bunch of right-wing newspapers.
I'll start debunking them:
One of the links talks about Michael Gableman (a guy who risks being disbarred for making false accusations).
His claims were debunked and he risks consequences for his false claims.
LINK
The post about Mark Zuckerberg doesn't even show the thing you claimed it did as well. It doesn't show voter fraud and it talks about this being found in the Wisconsin report (run by none other than discredited Michael Gableman).
So that's two debunked claims as well made by the same discredited Gableman.
Next, onto the Maricopa County claim, I've already debunked that above.
The Yuma County School Board claim is debunked here:
LINK
quote:
Earlier this week, Fuentes (the woman in the mug shot) pleaded guilty to the ballot-collection charges. The more serious charges added later were dropped. The Associated Press reported that investigators believe Fuentes collected more than the handful of ballots she was videotaped with, but also that there was “no sign her illegal ballot collection went beyond the small-town politics Fuentes was involved in.”
So let's get this thing straight.
Two of your claims were made by someone who was found in contempt of court and risks being disbarred for making false claims.
The other claim doesn't show wide-spread voter fraud in the slightest.
quote:
Run back to dem underground punk kid troll alter. Your time is up here.
I suggest you should run along. I've demonstrated once again that your claims are incredibly spurious and made by people who have been discredited by their own profession.
So nice try. I knew it was going to be exhausting trying to rebut all your false claims and I'm sure you'll respond with some inane claim that even courts and the Wisconsin bar are corrupt.
I'm sure you're going to link spam more links. I'm not going to bother rebutting them because I know they'll be easily rebutted like the sample you gave above and I've got more time in the world.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:54 pm to Jjdoc
They know it won’t go well and the fingers will be pointed at Pelosi, Shumer and the rest of the morons leading the party into disarray. The internal fights for control will be glorious.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:12 pm to drdanger605
quote:
Lmao.
You've provided no evidence and instead you continue to grasp at things.
I've got enough experience to know that Biden won the election.
LOL! Keep talking. We love it
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:22 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
LOL! Keep talking. We love it
Lmao.
Keep attaching Gateway Pundit links that are easily debunked.
I've even debunked the other links that 'Fat Bastard' attached.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:23 pm to drdanger605
quote:
I've even debunked
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:24 pm to drdanger605
BWAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAH
NONE OF YOUR TWO LINKS DEBUNKS ANY CLAIMS IN MY LINKS.
CAN YOU NOT READ RETARD?
Your first link does not work and second does not disprove what mine claims.
Again can you not read ?
You keep moving goalpost because it’s killing ur punk arse. Lol. Bless your heart Commie
Your WAPO LINK IS A FAILURE.
Holy fack I’m done
Wasting time with you.
You are dem
Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.
NONE OF YOUR TWO LINKS DEBUNKS ANY CLAIMS IN MY LINKS.
CAN YOU NOT READ RETARD?
Your first link does not work and second does not disprove what mine claims.
Again can you not read ?
You keep moving goalpost because it’s killing ur punk arse. Lol. Bless your heart Commie
Your WAPO LINK IS A FAILURE.
Holy fack I’m done
Wasting time with you.
You are dem
Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:27 pm to drdanger605
Lmao.
Yeah lil buddy you debunked all hundreds of links with evidence I linked within links. You link shite ThT does not even address what mine claims. Bwahahahahhaha
JFC. Man. Gtfo.
Lololollolllolol
Yeah lil buddy you debunked all hundreds of links with evidence I linked within links. You link shite ThT does not even address what mine claims. Bwahahahahhaha
JFC. Man. Gtfo.
Lololollolllolol
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:29 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
BWAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAH
NONE OF YOUR TWO LINKS DEBUNKS ANY CLAIMS IN MY LINKS.
CAN YOU NOT READ RETARD?
No. It can't comprehend.
It's not ignorance..... It's the inability to learn!
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:32 pm to drdanger605
quote:
drdanger605
I’ll give you the benefit and assume you are new to the board.
There is a recurring theme in these type threads that can only be explained as mental illness on some level. At this point it’s actually kind of cruel to keep pushing their buttons.
Good day
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:34 pm to Fat Bastard
Lmao.
Yes, they do. Here's a working link below.
Michael Gableman was found in contempt of court and has essentially conducted a partisan examination for which he has been fined. He also risks being disbarred.
You keep putting up discredited individuals. The guy kept deleting emails, records and documents during his 'partisan' investigation when they were requested - it's clear it was a partisan investigation when he's deleting documents relating to the investigation.
LINK
Yes, it does.
It disproves that there was wide-spread voter fraud. An individual delivering 4 ballots isn't evidence of wide-spread voter fraud.
Dude, you've been caught so many times it's exhausting.
You shift and cite discredited individuals.
First, it was the Maricopa County fraud which I debunked and pointed out that even non-Maricopa-county officials disproved that there were 20,000 illegal votes.
No, it isn't a failure lol. This isn't an argument - you've got to explain why it's a failure.
My guy, you tried arguing there was widespread voter fraud. You're the only one moving goal posts.
You cited a discredited official who risks being disbarred for lying, you cited an individual who was found guilty of handing in 4 ballots, and cited a debunked Arizona audit.
How ... how does this prove wide-spread voter fraud?
Dude, you tried to argue that Maricopa County was corrupt when non-Maricopa-county officials corroborated their analysis.
Keep grasping because this is exhausting. You've not demonstrated there was widespread voter fraud in the slightest.
Ironically, the one individual who you cited in your link IS ACTUALLY CORRUPT (and is being fined for it/found in contempt) and yet you ignore that. How convenient...
Holy frick you can't be serious.
Yes, they do. Here's a working link below.
Michael Gableman was found in contempt of court and has essentially conducted a partisan examination for which he has been fined. He also risks being disbarred.
You keep putting up discredited individuals. The guy kept deleting emails, records and documents during his 'partisan' investigation when they were requested - it's clear it was a partisan investigation when he's deleting documents relating to the investigation.
LINK
quote:
second does not disprove what mine claims.
Yes, it does.
It disproves that there was wide-spread voter fraud. An individual delivering 4 ballots isn't evidence of wide-spread voter fraud.
quote:
Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.
Dude, you've been caught so many times it's exhausting.
You shift and cite discredited individuals.
First, it was the Maricopa County fraud which I debunked and pointed out that even non-Maricopa-county officials disproved that there were 20,000 illegal votes.
quote:
Your WAPO LINK IS A FAILURE.
No, it isn't a failure lol. This isn't an argument - you've got to explain why it's a failure.
quote:
Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.
My guy, you tried arguing there was widespread voter fraud. You're the only one moving goal posts.
You cited a discredited official who risks being disbarred for lying, you cited an individual who was found guilty of handing in 4 ballots, and cited a debunked Arizona audit.
How ... how does this prove wide-spread voter fraud?
quote:
You keep moving goalpost because it’s killing ur punk arse. Lol. Bless your heart Commie
Dude, you tried to argue that Maricopa County was corrupt when non-Maricopa-county officials corroborated their analysis.
Keep grasping because this is exhausting. You've not demonstrated there was widespread voter fraud in the slightest.
Ironically, the one individual who you cited in your link IS ACTUALLY CORRUPT (and is being fined for it/found in contempt) and yet you ignore that. How convenient...
Holy frick you can't be serious.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 3:38 pm
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News