drdanger605

quote:

---

That you don't understand Biden being laughed at because he stated the ruble collapsing was a great win vs what actually happened vs your own thoughts is something to behold.

---

Lmao, you're that ignorant that you don't understand that the aim of sanctions isn't just to weaken the rouble.

LINK

Biden didn't just say that the purpose of sanctions is to weaken the value of the rouble.

quote:

---

"We will keep raising the economic cost and ratchet up the pain for Putin and further increase Russia's economic isolation," Biden said, decrying the intentional targeting of civilians by Russia and heralding a united Western response, even as he acknowledged the battle was still ongoing.

---

Raising the economic cost includes reducing the size of the domestic economy.

quote:

---

The sanctions are designed to tighten the vise on Russia's economy, which has been kneecapped by Western punishment. Still, ever-harsher consequences for the invasion of Ukraine have not appeared to force Putin to ease a brutal campaign that has increasingly targeted civilians.

---

LINK

quote:

---

I have several degrees, own 3 businesses, and have worked since the age of 14.

---

Hmm... yet you don't seem to understand that the purpose of sanctions is multifold, the fact that Biden didn't say that the purpose of sanctions was to weaken the rouble alone, and that Russia's economy is still shrinking.

quote:

---

"Hey Biden killed Russia because the Ruble is down and the economy is bad... Wait.. it's actually UP?? Oh.. well... That's great because it means the economy is BAD!"

---

You are ignorant.

Russia's economy is still bad despite the currency value going up. I'm struggling to understand how you're grappling with that difficult concept - you can own as many businesses as you want but I very much doubt you're very successful considering this is tripping you up.

Biden clearly said that the purpose of sanctions is to weaken Russia's economy - it clearly has done so. Pointing to the value of the currency going up doesn't disprove that considering how much their economy has shrunk.

You are ignorant and I very much doubt that you've studied Economics at undergrad.

quote:

---

It's not ignorance..... It's the inability to learn!

---

You've provided nothing of value.

You instead interject with pointless comments and you've not provided any sort of points yourself.

My inability to learn that you people cite discredited individuals and partisan audits? Lol - I've learnt that much already.

I've also learnt your adoration of Gateway Pundit.

quote:

---

Yeah lil buddy you debunked all hundreds of links with evidence I linked within links. You link shite ThT does not even address what mine claims. Bwahahahahhaha

---

Yes, it does.

Keep ignoring that Michael Gableman was found in contempt of court and deleting documents during his 'investigation'.

:rotflmao:

Somehow, Maricopa County is corrupt but an actual guy who is corrupt and found in contempt of court is more than usable as evidence for you. He was the one who created the partisan Wisconsin report.

:rotflmao:

I then debunked your dumb claim that there were 20,000 illegal ballots cast in Arizona - you didn't even argue against that.

Lmao.

Yes, they do. Here's a working link below.

Michael Gableman was found in contempt of court and has essentially conducted a partisan examination for which he has been fined. He also risks being disbarred.

You keep putting up discredited individuals. The guy kept deleting emails, records and documents during his 'partisan' investigation when they were requested - it's clear it was a partisan investigation when he's deleting documents relating to the investigation.

LINK

quote:

---

second does not disprove what mine claims.

---

Yes, it does.

It disproves that there was wide-spread voter fraud. An individual delivering 4 ballots isn't evidence of wide-spread voter fraud.

quote:

---

Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.

---

Dude, you've been caught so many times it's exhausting.

You shift and cite discredited individuals.

First, it was the Maricopa County fraud which I debunked and pointed out that even non-Maricopa-county officials disproved that there were 20,000 illegal votes.

quote:

---

Your WAPO LINK IS A FAILURE.

---

No, it isn't a failure lol. This isn't an argument - you've got to explain why it's a failure.

quote:

---

Underground walking talking stumbling bumbling epitome of spin and talking points and move goalposts to interpret it as something different thinking you’ve won. You miss the whole entire premise plus you’ve been caught in lies already.

---

My guy, you tried arguing there was widespread voter fraud. You're the only one moving goal posts.

You cited a discredited official who risks being disbarred for lying, you cited an individual who was found guilty of handing in 4 ballots, and cited a debunked Arizona audit.

How ... how does this prove wide-spread voter fraud? :rotflmao:

quote:

---

You keep moving goalpost because it’s killing ur punk arse. Lol. Bless your heart Commie

---

Dude, you tried to argue that Maricopa County was corrupt when non-Maricopa-county officials corroborated their analysis.

:rotflmao:

Keep grasping because this is exhausting. You've not demonstrated there was widespread voter fraud in the slightest.

Ironically, the one individual who you cited in your link IS ACTUALLY CORRUPT (and is being fined for it/found in contempt) and yet you ignore that. How convenient...

:rotflmao:

Holy frick you can't be serious.

quote:

---

BTW.. The USA economy shrank in the first 3 months.

---

Not as much as the Russian economy is projected to.

quote:

---

Biden proclaimed the Rouble being dead and it was a goal to bring them to their knees. You are a kid who is too ignorant to have this conversation.

---

You're too ignorant to understand that sanctions have multiple objectives. One of those objectives was to weaken Russia's currency but it's not the only objective (the other objective is to shrink the economy which sanctions are doing).

You seriously tried to argue currency strength showed Russia was winning the economic war. Their domestic economy is in shatters - linking a piece talking about trade balance doesn't dispute that.

If you had any sort of economics background, you wouldn't seriously be arguing that currency strength shows Russia's in a strong position. You're the kid here because you fail to understand that sanctions don't just have one objective.

Reducing the value of the ruble/rouble is a quick way of bringing Russia to their knees but the overall shrinking of the domestic economy is another.

So, once again, you misunderstand and conflate three different things.

Trade Balance isn't the same as Domestic Economy and it isn't the same as Currency Strength.

Currency strength is a weak form of protection against sanctions but it does little to erode the Russian economy shrinking.

Again, you are ignorant and misunderstand basic economics. To keep the currency strong, Russia has had to limit capital flow in and out of the country.

quote:

---

BTW.. The USA economy shrank in the first 3 months.

---

You are ignorant.

Russia's economy has been shrinking for a lot longer than the first quarter of 2022.

LINK

Click 'Russia' and you'll see that Russia's economy has been shrinking for a long time. Their GDP per capita is abysmal and remains small.

Russia's currency getting stronger doesn't at all show that Russia is winning the economic war. Their domestic economy is shrinking - the sanctions are still working.

As I've pointed out (yet you seem to ignore), the US could easily strengthen their own currency but it would heavily damage the US economy. It's a meaningless victory because you've accepted the narrative by Putin that he's somehow holding steady.

Well, I've already debunked your Arizona claim.

quote:

---

You never read a single link among hundreds within the hyperlinks and could never disprove any claims those links made. You spin shite with word salad to avoid calling it fraud.

---

I've now clicked it and it links to a bunch of right-wing newspapers.

I'll start debunking them:

One of the links talks about Michael Gableman (a guy who risks being disbarred for making false accusations).

His claims were debunked and he risks consequences for his false claims.

LINK


The post about Mark Zuckerberg doesn't even show the thing you claimed it did as well. It doesn't show voter fraud and it talks about this being found in the Wisconsin report (run by none other than discredited Michael Gableman).

So that's two debunked claims as well made by the same discredited Gableman.

Next, onto the Maricopa County claim, I've already debunked that above.

The Yuma County School Board claim is debunked here:

LINK

quote:

---

Earlier this week, Fuentes (the woman in the mug shot) pleaded guilty to the ballot-collection charges. The more serious charges added later were dropped. The Associated Press reported that investigators believe Fuentes collected more than the handful of ballots she was videotaped with, but also that there was “no sign her illegal ballot collection went beyond the small-town politics Fuentes was involved in.”

---

So let's get this thing straight.

Two of your claims were made by someone who was found in contempt of court and risks being disbarred for making false claims.

The other claim doesn't show wide-spread voter fraud in the slightest.

quote:

---

Run back to dem underground punk kid troll alter. Your time is up here.

---

I suggest you should run along. I've demonstrated once again that your claims are incredibly spurious and made by people who have been discredited by their own profession.

So nice try. I knew it was going to be exhausting trying to rebut all your false claims and I'm sure you'll respond with some inane claim that even courts and the Wisconsin bar are corrupt.

:rotflmao:

I'm sure you're going to link spam more links. I'm not going to bother rebutting them because I know they'll be easily rebutted like the sample you gave above and I've got more time in the world.

quote:

---

It has no logic. It has no real world experience and it's evident in it's posts.

---

Lmao.

You've provided no evidence and instead you continue to grasp at things.

I've got enough experience to know that Biden won the election.

quote:

---

That’s dumb. Of course those European countries didn’t like Trump, he wasn’t going to fool around, like they had all been doing the 30 years prior to Trump. The argument that other countries didn’t like him, therefore he was bad for this country is stupid I think. Of course they aren’t going to like someone who puts his country first.

---

That's not why people disliked Trump.

People disliked Trump because of the way he spoke and his mannerisms/behavior. He was seen as a laughing stock. Most people don't know Trump's policies or 'America-first policies' - they just saw someone who used to tweet a lot, was fairly unpredictable, and said insane things.

The average person doesn't really know foreign policy or even American foreign policy. The approval rating is largely based on whether countries view you as a laughing stock or not - that's it.

In any case, my point is, Trump was a much bigger laughing stock to the rest of the world if you're going to use laughing stock as a metric.

quote:

---

Why would I tell you how people can tell and alter or banned person with a new account?

---

Because you can't.

Instead, you make accusations based on my familiarity with the board/terms.

But I'm looking forward to your next gateway pundit post.

:rotflmao:

quote:

---

LOL! So this is admitting you are an alter or somebody who had been banned.

---

How does me saying 'I'm not sabes que' demonstrate any of that?

All I'm saying is I'm not that guy nor am I an alter.

quote:

---

Oh look. It’s sabes que.

---

I'm not sabes que.

That guy doesn't even use capitalizations in his comments and he types in broken english.