- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Are The Democrats & Media Going To Get 4 Jeff Flakes For Impeachment?
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:24 am
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:24 am
Four republicans.
The democrats and the media are looking for 4 republicans to vote with them to open up this impeachment and drag it out for months. They have no chance of removing the President so this is their goal. Just to gum it up and drag out a negative Trump bash trial.
The media is targeting republicans in tough state elections. They tried to intimidate McSally the other day and she told them to piss off. Are they going to get their four Jeff Flakes?
Susan Collins?
Cory Gardner?
Reek?
Martha McSally?
Murk?
The democrats and the media are looking for 4 republicans to vote with them to open up this impeachment and drag it out for months. They have no chance of removing the President so this is their goal. Just to gum it up and drag out a negative Trump bash trial.
The media is targeting republicans in tough state elections. They tried to intimidate McSally the other day and she told them to piss off. Are they going to get their four Jeff Flakes?
Susan Collins?
Cory Gardner?
Reek?
Martha McSally?
Murk?
6
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:26 am to LuckyTiger
It's a really bad strategy. The witnesses that the republicans call will make the dems look really bad.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:27 am to LuckyTiger
The longer this shite goes the better it will be for the Magnificent Orange Bastard
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:29 am to LuckyTiger
I hope so. I'm ready to see the chaos pop off.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:46 am to CoachChappy
I don’t think the republicans are going to actually call the witnesses that we would like to see.
I feel that many here will be disappointed.
I feel that many here will be disappointed.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:55 am to LuckyTiger
Depends.
Mitt seems a given.
Collins? That would be suicidal for her because she is already being challenged by the Dems and has iffy support from the GOP.
McSally? Not happening. She basically told them to frick off recebtly IIRC.
Gardner? Likely.
Murkowski? She likes to showboat, I don’t think she wants to end up on McConnell’s shitlist considering she owes a lot of power to him.
Mitt seems a given.
Collins? That would be suicidal for her because she is already being challenged by the Dems and has iffy support from the GOP.
McSally? Not happening. She basically told them to frick off recebtly IIRC.
Gardner? Likely.
Murkowski? She likes to showboat, I don’t think she wants to end up on McConnell’s shitlist considering she owes a lot of power to him.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:58 am to teke184
She voted against Kavanaugh.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 11:59 am to teke184
If the Senate does like the House and only allows Democratic witnesses and the Republicans are not allowed to call witnesses I will be angry.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 12:01 pm to LuckyTiger
Was she able to block him? Nope.
She was allowed to showboat by voting against him while he still passed. If that vote was going to make the difference, she’d have been whipped harder than Kunta Kinte to vote for him.
She was allowed to showboat by voting against him while he still passed. If that vote was going to make the difference, she’d have been whipped harder than Kunta Kinte to vote for him.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 12:28 pm to LuckyTiger
They need a lot more than four
Posted on 1/21/20 at 12:47 pm to LuckyTiger
Romney is the only one I see voting with Dems. Maybe Lee from Utah as well.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 12:48 pm to More&Les
quote:
need a lot more than four
Yes, for removal. But only 4 for a vote on rules of impeachment and various other resolutions pertaining to said impeachment.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 12:50 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
She voted against Kavanaugh.
No, she didn’t.
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:02 pm to Indefatigable
Yes, she did.
She doesn’t get to hide behind semantics.
She doesn’t get to hide behind semantics.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 4:53 pm to LuckyTiger
There are also 2 democrats who could flip/flop also. Manchin in WV and Jones in AL.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 6:08 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Yes, she did.
She doesn’t get to hide behind semantics.
But she does, and she did. McConnell allowed her to pair her vote with Daines’ absence because confirmation was in the bag. It is incredibly common.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 6:40 pm to LuckyTiger
Murkowski is a dead Senator walking.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 6:52 pm to bird35
quote:Uh... the Senate is a Republican majority. It would be more likely that if any witnesses are there, it will be a witness for the Republicans that was there. You know, a first-hand witness, like...
If the Senate does like the House and only allows Democratic witnesses and the Republicans are not allowed to call witnesses I will be angry.
the whistleblower.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News