Started By
Message

re: Another Wedding Bombed by US Military

Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:36 am to
Posted by Enzos Tiny Pito
Member since Oct 2019
2287 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

I don’t know if you are asking me this directly, but what does this mean? TIA


I was not sorry

Just that the NYT is reporting that a direct missile hit on a soft unfortified target somehow killed only 5 of 72 attendees.


Probably the lowest % in any bomb blast ever
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
71444 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:07 am to
Centcom is on the case.
LINK
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13953 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:30 am to
The British levelled Dresden in WWII, similarly useless targets.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
20536 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:39 am to
No link. What a fig.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
11009 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:40 am to
Or Iran is good at propaganda.
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3373 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:02 am to
Sounds like it was blast.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56763 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:17 pm to
Are we sure it just wasn't part of the Pyrotechnics Show for the Wedding that maybe went wrong?
Posted by Othello
the Neptonian Steel Mines
Member since Aug 2013
25357 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:38 pm to
These cretins don't care about things like Fallujah or Dresden. Muh 'Merica, dindu nuffin!
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
17563 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Seeing this several places. Seems our military has a proclivity for bombing weddings in the ME.

Sounds like everyone had a blast.

Edited: damn, Cleverusername beat me to it on page 1.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11745 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Another Wedding Bombed by US Military


I love it! No one crashes a wedding like the United States Air Force!
Posted by CA Jones
Member since Jan 2021
349 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:32 pm to
I don’t think The NYT has a journalist on their staff.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
26149 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

The bomb was American, according to a weapons expert and a visual analysis by The New York Times


Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
38186 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Or Iran is good at propaganda.

Many amongst us don’t want to hear that. Which is quite telling. I.e. they want it to be the exact case as described in the piece.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
42314 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:49 pm to
I couldn't care less if we bombed every person inside Iran. The world would be better for it.
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
1095 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

but the mere impossibility of this scenario is seldom analyzed.


Begin.
Posted by Audustxx
Member since Jul 2022
2560 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:58 pm to
With hope they will stop breeding
Posted by Ferdinand
Member since Aug 2026
166 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:06 pm to
How old was the bride? F Iran.
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
1460 posts
Posted on 9/6/26 at 7:13 am to
quote:

but the mere impossibility of this scenario is seldom analyzed.

quote:

Begin

I may have erred in the use of ‘impossibility’. I would amend it to ‘overwhelmingly improbable.’

They are an unarmed, untrained large and spread out population with no real way to mobilize and develop the logistics necessary to launch an offensive against a large ideological fighting force. There is no evidence that there is any cohesion of militias spread out over a vast country necessary to even posit a real revolt. There is no evidence of a unified ideology among their populace to challenge their government and military. The moderates in their government are in fear for their lives and has been reported that in several cases some have been killed for suggesting a change the in course of action.

There is also no evidence that the required mutiny among their decentralized military forces to create any feasibility of a revolt is present. The misery index (a real thing) is at a historical high due to the near worthlessness of their currency and the growing scarcity of resources. In other words they are in survival mode more than fighting mode.

Though to an unknown degree, the attack of their nation by foreign powers and assassination of their leaders has created national unity against the these nations. It is historically the case to hold (to a great degree) these nations responsible for their dire situation.

We romanticize the idea of breaking the chains of tyranny because it is the foundational principle in the birth of our nation. It is blind optimism to think that this alien mindset will blossom 250 years later in a country beset by war and no organizational structure for its genesis.

Those things are the basis of my opinion.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
29285 posts
Posted on 9/6/26 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Even if there was not a wedding bombed, are you comparing Iranians (that we want to kill) to Hitler? Hyperbole, yes.


No, he's just showing that the military act itself isn't necessarily immoral.

Hitler = yes, proves that it can be acceptable.

Once you determine that then you have to debate where the line is drawn.

Who was their target?
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
1095 posts
Posted on 9/6/26 at 9:19 pm to
Ok, thanks. It's all believable and I'll assume your information is trustworthy, but I never rule out the low odds.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram