- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: And it’s all she wrote, boys & girls; say goodbye to the Republic!
Posted on 4/10/21 at 6:45 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 4/10/21 at 6:45 am to Ace Midnight
They have the pics of enough gop sent store in compromising positions to get the votes.
0
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:00 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
will have to have 60 votes in the Senate as it is currently configured
right up until Schumer decides that 60 votes (or even 51 votes) requirement is racist. At the rate this is going, all future senate decisions that are deemed to be for "racial fairness" can be passed with only 20 votes = representative of percentage of black people resident in country. == just so we eliminate 'systemic racism' from stopping the simple desires that the DEMs insist they know about what is 'good for black people."
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:04 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:Does anyone believe he truly didn't want to do this?
Biden says he's 'not a fan' of court-packing and that he doesn't ...
LINK › 2020/10/13 › politics › joe-biden-...
Oct 14, 2020 — Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said Monday that he's "not a fan" of court-packing, providing his clearest position on an issue he ...
Biden Says He's 'Not A Fan' Of Packing Supreme Court : NPR
LINK › 2020/10/13 › biden-says-hes-not-a-...
Oct 13, 2020 — After weeks of deflecting on whether he would seek to increase the number of justices on the Supreme Court if elected president, Democratic ...
Biden Says He Will Convene Bipartisan Commission To Study ...
LINK › 2020/10/22 › asked-about-court-pa...
Oct 22, 2020 — The Democratic nominee envisions a bipartisan group of constitutional scholars who would, after 180 days, make recommendations to reform ...
Biden, under pressure on 'court packing,' says he would ...
LINK › Politics › story › id=73760039
Oct 22, 2020 — Catch up on the developing stories making headlines. Former Vice President Joe Biden says, if elected, he would turn to a bipartisan commission ...
Biden says he won't divulge position on court packing until ...
LINK › politics › 2020-election › b...
Oct 8, 2020 — The statement, made to reporters in Arizona ahead of a campaign event, sowed additional confusion on where the Democratic presidential ...
Top stories
Will Biden ‘Pack’ the Supreme Court?
The New York Times·11 hours ago
Biden unveils commission to study changes at the
Supreme Court after pressure from progressives
USA Today·19 hours ago
Biden to order bipartisan commission to study
Supreme Court expansion
CNBC·20 hours ago
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:16 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
That’s something I preach regularly. Nobody’s doing anything until the economy collapses (stay tuned). And then, will it be too late?
Dunno. Go ask Venezuela.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:24 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Yep, if they pack the court the 1st and 2nd Amendments and our 401K accounts will be gone, gone with the wind. And that will just be for starters, it goes downhill from there
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:32 am to Cajun Tigah
2004 Article about Venezuela court ‘reform’
Nothing to worry about at all.......
quote:
President Chávez signed a court-packing law that allowed his governing coalition in the legislature to obtain an overwhelming majority of seats on the country’s highest court
Nothing to worry about at all.......
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 7:33 am
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:47 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Anyone who cares about this country should be pushing for a constitutional amendment to set the number of supreme court justices at 9 or less.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 7:59 am to 4Ghost
quote:
Phuckkk you Georgia.
I agree with your sentiment but you stick that Wakanda in any otherwise rural state and the result is gonna be the same.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 8:00 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Any change to the way the Supreme Court operates will have to have 60 votes in the Senate as it is currently configured.
Not when they cancel the filibuster.
Folks, they’ve already decided to cancel the filibuster. They just haven’t told us yet. They will quietly do it when they have manufactured some crisis and those darned republicans are obstructing its passage. Then they will cancel it saying it’s the GOP’s fault.
Wake the frick up, people. This is happening.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 8:58 am to NoShow
quote:
We need names of the commission.
We absolutely need to do this. It’s time to take it to them on a personal level. Wreck their lives personally. Quit being above that and get dirty. Guerilla warfare is the only option left to us, let’s use it.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 9:25 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
It will have to get a lot worse before it can get a little better.
My prediction: Suffering.
My prediction: Suffering.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:02 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Anyone who cares about this country should be pushing for a constitutional amendment to set the number of supreme court justices at 9 or less.
That would not stop them. It didnt stop them from screwing around with the 2nd amendment.
Shall not be infringed is extremely clear. It means there are to be no laws to infringe on anyone's right to a firearm. I personally believe that every single gun law on the books is unconstitutional. If there is to be any restriction on guns, the second amendment would need to be AMENDED, then laws could be written to restrict things. (I understand the need for some restrictions (felons and mentally ill, etc) but the government has not done it in the proper way because they feel they dont have too).
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:10 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
Die on your feet or live on your knees. It's time for everyone to decide.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:20 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Any change to the way the Supreme Court operates will have to have 60 votes in the Senate as it is currently configured.
Just like with the election, the Left will ignore the rules and the MSM will sell it. The OP is right; I've long said that this Ideological/Religious Governmental argument will not be won with talk or votes. Truth has become Subjective. Which may well be the ultimate Universal Principle; as people choose their Reality via their Beliefs and Actions, and 'reap that which they sew'. Which is the only fair way; as God gave us Free Will. If God did not, then 'He/It' would be creating Humanity to worship Him, with no choice. And Lucifer would take Him (God's innate altruistic intent) to the philosophical cleaners. "War in Heaven and on Earth". Strap in. And like the OP said, get ready to make a choice and live with the consequences.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:47 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
This board has become so melodramatic it's not even funny anymore.
But this does raise a good point as to why there's no term limits here. Always thought that was werid especially for a position so important
But this does raise a good point as to why there's no term limits here. Always thought that was werid especially for a position so important
Posted on 4/10/21 at 10:49 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
quote:
When it’s packed, we’re toast
We aren’t doing so well now with it unpacked.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 11:06 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
Unless I missed something how does the infrastructure bill remove the filibuster?
I thought they were using budget reconciliation for that.
Well, there's a lot of pork that can be distributed in exchange for future votes and I don't think they can use budget reconciliation to raise taxes and the minimum wage?
Posted on 4/10/21 at 11:14 am to EuphoricSSP
quote:
Depends on what happens with DeSantis/Trump in 2024, that might actually be the "last stand" at least from a governing standpoint.
Make it a DJT/DeSantis ticket and I'm in.
Posted on 4/10/21 at 11:17 am to alphaandomega
quote:
Shall not be infringed is extremely clear. It means there are to be no laws to infringe on anyone's right to a firearm. I personally believe that every single gun law on the books is unconstitutiona
Agree, save possession by convicted felons, and I would have no angst if that was limited to specific felony convictions. Example: I don’t care if some dude who sold 3 ounces of weed to an undercover cop in 94 now owns a fun(s). Edit gun(s)
This post was edited on 4/10/21 at 11:31 am
Posted on 4/10/21 at 11:23 am to Vastmind
The SC was one vote away from tossing away our constitutional rights to both assembly and religion in that Cali case. I think we've already lost.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News