- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: An in depth look at the Whistleblower Complaint
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:27 pm to deathvalleytiger10
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:27 pm to deathvalleytiger10
This whistle blower report reads with the DISCLAIMER - I didn't say this and know nothing.
0
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:29 pm to deathvalleytiger10
I don't find that too exceptional, I would imagine that a lot of federal whistle blowers bring pretty valuable information that they came about second hand.
With the summary of the call though, I dont even imagine we should care about the whistle blower any longer.
I dont care that they look at Trump, if he withheld funds approved by Congress for personal favor it should be brought to light. He will not be impeached over this.
However, we should look at ALL of the bullshite our leaders do. We wont, and if that is a give, which it is, this is just a witch hunt.
With the summary of the call though, I dont even imagine we should care about the whistle blower any longer.
I dont care that they look at Trump, if he withheld funds approved by Congress for personal favor it should be brought to light. He will not be impeached over this.
However, we should look at ALL of the bullshite our leaders do. We wont, and if that is a give, which it is, this is just a witch hunt.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:31 pm to tigerfoot
That’s it, the Whistleblower is Sgnt Shultz
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:33 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:It’s important if you don’t care about the accuracy of the message and/or the truth of that message, and you instead focus on the messenger and make up some irrelevant facts him/her.
FIFY. You left out the most important piece
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:34 pm to deathvalleytiger10
Assuming all of those quotes by you are accurately quoted, the Dems are really, really desperate to try and use that complaint for anything against Trump.
That type of "evidence" would be laughed at by a judge in court.
That type of "evidence" would be laughed at by a judge in court.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:36 pm to LSURussian
Dems don’t care if it’s circumstantial, they just wanted blood in the water, and hope they find something else, or the President tries to obstruct....they just want any exposed skin
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:37 pm to FloridaCrackhead
quote:Ummmm the justice department was given the report and looked into whether any campaign finance laws were broken.
For me, the most queer part of this is why an inspector general would turn over the information to intel people instead of the Justice Department where these things are addressed. T
And the IG is required to report any complaints he seems urgent and credible to congress.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:38 pm to deathvalleytiger10
"In the course of my official duties"
"It is routine for U.S officials with responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information with one another in order to inform policy making and analysis"
"It is routine for U.S officials with responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information with one another in order to inform policy making and analysis"
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:38 pm to deathvalleytiger10
That's not a whistleblower. He can be outed legally
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:40 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
I am sure they did. And I am sure you are giddy
Watching trumpkins cope with Trump acting like a Clinton has been pretty great
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:41 pm to deathvalleytiger10
This is not a "whistle blower" but just another dirty leaker. If he leaked anything that was confidential or classified, he should be arrested and jailed.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:42 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
The worst part about this is that there are still "officials" inside and with direct access to the President's daily activities that are clearly trying to undermine him.
Somebody in the room during this phone call, with clear malicious intent, gave a 1st hand account of the conversation to someone else, obviously hoping it would lead to a harmful result.
Maybe. The complaint also stated that the WB received a summary of the call. They could have fabricated additional inputs so as not to appear to be the sole source of this editorialized account of the call (via transcript).
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:42 pm to narddogg81
quote:How is that not a whistleblower?
That's not a whistleblower. He can be outed legally
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:43 pm to bmy
quote:
Watching trumpkins cope with Trump acting like a Clinton has been pretty great
Watching bmy cope with the slow realization that Trump will be re-elected has been GLORIOUS.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:43 pm to monsterballads
quote:
And people just believe it.
Most people don't. Democrats do.
There's a big difference between the two
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:44 pm to buckeye_vol
Nothing in the "message" warrants anything.
The call was a nothing burger. The rest is just stuff in the news.
But go ahead and impeach Dems. Something tells me they won't.
Dog and Pony Show.
The call was a nothing burger. The rest is just stuff in the news.
But go ahead and impeach Dems. Something tells me they won't.
Dog and Pony Show.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:44 pm to Auburn1968
quote:No. He/she didn’t leak because he/she went to the IG as he/she is able due to being protected by the law.
This is not a "whistle blower" but just another dirty leaker. If he leaked anything that was confidential or classified, he should be arrested and jailed.
If he/she went to the media, that would be leaking.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:45 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:Ok. Then why did you focus on something else then?
Nothing in the "message" warrants anything.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:45 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
urgent and credible
This does not meet the smell test for either.
Posted on 9/26/19 at 3:48 pm to themunch
quote:Well take that up with the IG.
This does not meet the smell test for either.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News