- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: An honest question regarding the reality of this Kavanaugh situation
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:04 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:04 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
This isn't a trial, it's a job interview.
It’s a hearing, you insane dolt. With witnesses, attorneys present, testimony under oath.
It’s a legal proceeding.
0
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:08 pm to TBoy
False. You do not get to negotiate terms with a judge and jury, flout deadlines, and dictate courtroom procedures.
You fail..... again.
You fail..... again.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
This isn't a trial, it's a job interview.
no. 
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:12 pm to Nguyener
quote:
In America:
Prosecution has the burdon of proof
You cannot be a witness against yourself
You have the right to face your accuser
You have the right to competent council
I could argue all 4 of those are being attacked and completely disregarded by the Progressives pushing this agenda.
Title IX has resulted in all of these being attacked on college campuses.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:13 pm to Taxing Authority
I remember my last job interview... my legal team wouldn't let me get a word in edgewise once the hiring manager put me under oath. 
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:18 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Prosecution has the burdon of proof
DEMOCRATs just pooh-pooh this - and claim this is not a prosecution. Nobody wants to send him to prison - they just want an "honest conversation about sexual abuse" - and Kavanaugh is supportive of sexual abuse because he , , ah . . er . . . hm ... JUST IS!!!
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:20 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:Unless a Democrat like Bill Clinton.
DEMOCRATs just pooh-pooh this - and claim this is not a prosecution
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:21 pm to TBoy
quote:
The plaintiff selects the court, the venue, the timing of the filing, and can move the hearing and trial pace at their selection. Try again
This isn’t a plaintiff. Try again.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
If it’s really an attempted rape, Christine Blasey should take a trip over to Maryland while she’s there and file a report.
I seem to have heard that she = or one of her attorneys = said she actually 'feared for her life"
If that is so, the Maryland law enforcement should take up the case and put everypne who attended that high school on oath to tell all they know about both she and Brett.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
This isn't a trial, it's a job interview
Even accepting this retarded response, aren't Dems/libs pushing to prohibit questions about criminal histories from job applications and interviews?
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:44 pm to ChineseBandit58
Yeah. I’m sure they constructed the story so that it was rape rape. The downside is that when their bluff gets called, they can still file charges to prove they’re serious.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 1:49 pm to BamaAtl
This “job interview” talking point is all over Twitter. I dont understand how this makes anything better.
The precedent this is setting is that you are presumed to be a liar if your employer disagrees with your political views. I don’t and will never understand how a political party who makes fighting discrimination a rallying cry, is perfectly ok with discriminating against hiring someone bc it presumes negative employment performance based on one’s politics. The USA was founded upon free expression- mainly because of politics. It is counter to a free society to discriminate based on political views, or the correctness thereof.
Democrats have no logic. No honor. Only emotion.
The precedent this is setting is that you are presumed to be a liar if your employer disagrees with your political views. I don’t and will never understand how a political party who makes fighting discrimination a rallying cry, is perfectly ok with discriminating against hiring someone bc it presumes negative employment performance based on one’s politics. The USA was founded upon free expression- mainly because of politics. It is counter to a free society to discriminate based on political views, or the correctness thereof.
Democrats have no logic. No honor. Only emotion.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:03 pm to Wednesday
If someone calls your employer and says “He raped me,” your employer will say, “Call the police.”
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:09 pm to TBoy
quote:
You must have no familiarity with the civil court system. The plaintiff selects the court, the venue, the timing of the filing, and can move the hearing and trial pace at their selection. Try again.
You sound like the typical trash that lives from lawsuit-to-lawsuit.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:11 pm to Lsupimp
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" -Thomas Jefferson
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:13 pm to TBoy
quote:
You must have no familiarity with the civil court system. The plaintiff selects the court, the venue, the timing of the filing, and can move the hearing and trial pace at their selection. Try again.
LOL, what?
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:15 pm to TBoy
quote:
The plaintiff selects the court, the venue, and can move the hearing and trial pace at their selection
Is that really how you think our justice system works?
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:16 pm to Y.A. Tittle
i think TBoy alleges he/she is a lawyer
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i think TBoy alleges he/she is a lawyer
Only serves to bolster this part of the OP:
quote:
It is not a criminal trial, which is why I did not cite amendments, but it is not unreasonable to see the same people supporting this situation supporting similar criminal trials, so the point stands as valid to me.
Posted on 9/23/18 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'd like to know where. I want to be able to open a plaintiff's practice wherever those rules apply.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News