- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Am I the only one who is terrified about the prospect of them removing Trump from power?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:34 pm to Northwestern tiger
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:34 pm to Northwestern tiger
The entire Obama Presidency set the precedent that the Left can do and say whatever they want to get their way. We've been sliding down that, away from decorum and deference for years.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:35 pm to Northwestern tiger
I believe if it were to happen that it would cause an unfixable rift in the population. We're almost there anyway, all it needs is a big push.
I believe it would lead to long term turmoil and instability, and a total loss of trust
I believe it would lead to long term turmoil and instability, and a total loss of trust
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I believe if it were to happen that it would cause an unfixable rift in the population. We're almost there anyway, all it needs is a big push.
I believe it would lead to long term turmoil and instability, and a total loss of trust
I agree completely with this, and I don't even believe it necessarily speaks to to the possibility of any actual physical violence.
It's really a completely terrible precedent and road to go down. What's even more frightening is how many people fail to see it.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:39 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What's even more frightening is how many people fail to see it.
Absolutely. It's like we're all on different planets or something.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:39 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
There's no such thing as an impeachable offense. If the house and Senate have a majority that want him out, he will be out. It could be just as much subjective as objective.
Can you tell me of the times this has occurred?
It is easy to say "Grand Jury will indict a ham sandwich". But, has a ham sandwich ever been indicted?
I don't get bent out of shape over "possible". I am more pragmatic than that.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:39 pm to Northwestern tiger
Show me the man and I'll find you the crime.
We are at the crucible.
We are at the crucible.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:40 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's really a completely terrible precedent and road to go down. What's even more frightening is how many people fail to see it.
I see that you've completely neglected to consider that, perhaps, Mueller has legitimate reasons for impanelling a GJ. Is this not even a possibility in your mind?
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:41 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
If the establishment went ahead with it, it will set a precedent...They can remove anyone that doesn't conform to their expectations with no regards to democracy.
They can come up with BS scheme/excuse and indict anyone.
I did not vote for Trump nor did I vote for anyone in the general election; but seeing what they're doing to him made it easier for me to support him.
Why not just wait and see what Mueller says? It's awful early to claim this is all a hoax.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:42 pm to Northwestern tiger
If our government is able to remove Trump based off nothing but "he isn't one of us", then yes, that is a horrific precedent to set.
But the likelihood of that happening is next to nothing, so it's nothing anyone should be worried about.
But the likelihood of that happening is next to nothing, so it's nothing anyone should be worried about.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:42 pm to Northwestern tiger
it terrifies me that republicans will stand with trump at all costs.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:43 pm to SleauxPlay
quote:
I see that you've completely neglected to consider that, perhaps, Mueller has legitimate reasons for impanelling a GJ. Is this not even a possibility in your mind?
Given the fact that nobody has even really articulated an actual particular crime at this point, yeah, pretty much.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:43 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
it terrifies me that republicans will stand with trump at all costs.
Well this is obviously false
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:45 pm to Northwestern tiger
Here's a fact that Trumpkins like to hide from daylight..
They put the Establishment in Washington. They elected the Swamp. Most of them did it passionately.
They put the Establishment in Washington. They elected the Swamp. Most of them did it passionately.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:45 pm to SleauxPlay
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see that you've completely neglected to consider that, perhaps, Mueller has legitimate reasons for impanelling a GJ. Is this not even a possibility in your mind?
If this works, it will be the standard going forward. I'll bet it leads to a constitutional crisis not seen in this country in over a century.
This post was edited on 8/4/17 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:46 pm to bamarep
quote:
Link proof to something he's done that warrants removal from office.
Pretty sure the character limit prevents that.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:50 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I don't get bent out of shape over "possible". I am more pragmatic than that.
At the outset of the investigation, Mueller was respected and impartial among the PT board. He has predictably now morphed into a partisan hack.
There is no outcome, on any Trumpian matter, that won't be subjected to the most painful post-hoc reasoning on this board. Mueller could have Trump on video, literally blowing Putin in exchange for DNC hacks, and somehow this would be further evidence of the establishment, running roughshod over our political system.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:51 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Pretty sure the character limit prevents that.
You should not be speaking about character.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:52 pm to Salmon
quote:
Well this is obviously false
They only fight him begrudgingly.
Posted on 8/4/17 at 1:53 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Given the fact that nobody has even really articulated an actual particular crime at this point, yeah, pretty much.
How about we wait and see what it presented to the GJ. Would that be reasonable?
Popular
Back to top



0









