Started By
Message

re: Alleged beating by Crawford Co Arkansas Deputies caught on video NSFW

Posted on 8/22/22 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by hogtard
Member since Aug 2022
52 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 1:40 pm to
In my town not far away, 3 cops shot a girl 20 times. Said she had a pipe.
State police announce investigation, and that results will be turned over to county.
That was six months ago. Not one word since.
Posted by GWM
Member since Aug 2021
1565 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 2:03 pm to
To quote you

quote:

What in the frick?


quote:

I'm not emotional about this. I am just a defender of our rights against thugs like you who can't even muster the most limited amount of intelligence to defend your animal-like behavior.


quote:

thugs like you

What are you basing your opinion on, Matlock ? Yet another emotional decision ?
Let me clarify it for you, the force used to subdue the perp was equal to, or one step higher (which is LEGAL) than that which was used by the perp. You might want to do some research on the National Force Continuum......

quote:

I am just a defender of our rights against thugs like you who can't even muster the most limited amount of intelligence to defend your animal-like behavior.


I would have welcomed cross-examination by a "defender" like you. I would have made you look like the complete imbecile that you are and by the way.....there was no need for Court, so it never went to court, because there was nothing done wrong.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

the force used to subdue the perp was equal to, or one step higher (which is LEGAL) than that which was used by the perp.


Good lord, you're an imbecile. I'm very relieved you're no longer a cop.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143821 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 2:18 pm to
are we going to "say this guys name"?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476900 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

What are you basing your opinion on, Matlock ?

Defending the thugs' behavior in the video by admitting your own thuggish behavior? Your own words, to summarize.

quote:

there was no need for Court, so it never went to court, because there was nothing done wrong.

What was the population of the jurisdiction who paid your salary?
Posted by Lucky_Stryke
central Bama
Member since Sep 2018
3182 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

and they're always 100% effective, because the manual says so

Oh, wait.....the manual didn't take into account the perp being on mind/pain altering drugs where he can't even feel pain, and has superhuman strength due to the drugs/adrenaline rush that he's experiencing



I say the same thing on page 8
Posted by hogtard
Member since Aug 2022
52 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:15 pm to
Life for all 3.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
28161 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Free beer for Life for all 3.
Posted by rb
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5633 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Other than vengeance (for him disobeying you) or trying to make him unconscious, what is accomplished by smashing his head into the sidewalk?
There’s a 99% chance the meth head would’ve stolen a half dozen catalytic converters had they not beat the shite out of him. I’d actually like to buy em a cup of coffee.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87369 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:30 pm to
I don't think there is anything wrong with a society that responds to this video with "Ok, maybe that's selectively edited, but the burden is on the police to justify what we see in the video evidence."

I agree we shouldn't lionize the "victim" before the facts are out

I disagree we can't pass any judgment at all until every fact is out. There is video of cops beating a man's head into the pavement. So yeah, the burden shifts.

Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5125 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:36 pm to
Depends on whether he struck an officer. If he struck one of them, then all bets are off. It's arse whopping time.

Kinda like the thread on the bus driver and the skinny kid. Kid went first and the bus driver gave him 3 to 4 times worse back. What's the difference?

The difference is cop haters don't believe a cop has a right to ever throw hands.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28170 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Kinda like the thread on the bus driver and the skinny kid. Kid went first and the bus driver gave him 3 to 4 times worse back. What's the difference?


Would you like a list of the differences?

I don't have a problem with violence, but the idea that some violence is justified doesn't mean that all violence is justified. What if one of the cops had stabbed the guy while the other two were holding him down? All bets are still off?
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
12297 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Depends on whether he struck an officer. If he struck one of them, then all bets are off. It's arse whopping time.


No, it is not arse whooping time just because a arrestee pisses you off. You can't legally punish them. Cops are not judge and jury.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Cops are not judge and jury.
sweet summer child
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
12297 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

quote:
Cops are not judge and jury.
sweet summer child


Any cop that thinks they are needs to water the tree of liberty.
Posted by GWM
Member since Aug 2021
1565 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Good lord, you're an imbecile. I'm very relieved you're no longer a cop.


What do you know about the force continuum ? How much time have you spent in LE ? You're lack of knowledge on the subject further exemplifies that your a dumb arse
Posted by GWM
Member since Aug 2021
1565 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Defending the thugs' behavior in the video by admitting your own thuggish behavior?


Everything I/We did was by the book, in the realm of the law. No charges, no court, no issue, so your "thuggish" accusations are unwarranted, Matlock

My jurisdiction, at the time, was roughly 250K......

Next ???? :lol: You're a fricking clown !
Posted by GWM
Member since Aug 2021
1565 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

I say the same thing on page 8


It's common sense, to anyone with a logical thought process familiar with Law Enforcement. But to the rest of the minions, all they want to harp on is that it's abuse of power/assault.....UNLESS it's a Bus Driver

The hypocrisy of some of the minions on this board is nothing short of hysterical
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
31586 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 6:10 pm to
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 6:29 pm to
You know his dad had a pouch in his back pocket every day of his life.
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram