- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
All this talk about 47 "shredding the constitution" yet no specific examples...
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:31 am
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:31 am
...of something he's doing that is fundamentally, basically, literally unconstitutional.
The talking points then shift to 47 going against "norms" or "historical standards" ...sorry if you don't like a new way of doing things but there is no constitutional requirement regarding norms or ways things have been done so keep doing them the same.
Anyway.
The talking points then shift to 47 going against "norms" or "historical standards" ...sorry if you don't like a new way of doing things but there is no constitutional requirement regarding norms or ways things have been done so keep doing them the same.
Anyway.
16
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:33 am to sidewalkside
It "feels" like he is shredding it to them, so that is their truth.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:35 am to sidewalkside
He appears to be pretty directly and unequivocally ignoring a 9-0 supreme court order. That’s not just norms or standards, that’s something significant.
It’s early days since that decision, so this warrants a little more time to see how the situation evolves. But saying there’s absolutely no reason to even be concerned here is asinine.
It’s early days since that decision, so this warrants a little more time to see how the situation evolves. But saying there’s absolutely no reason to even be concerned here is asinine.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:36 am to funnystuff
quote:
He appears to be pretty directly and unequivocally ignoring a 9-0 supreme court order
By not doing what? Kidnapping a MS-13 gang member from his own country and bringing him back here just so we could deport him again?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:38 am to funnystuff
quote:
But saying there’s absolutely no reason to even be concerned here is asinine.
I'm more concerned with judicial overreach and have been for some time. I'm not concerned about about a president ignoring them, I'm glad it's happening.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:38 am to funnystuff
quote:
But saying there’s absolutely no reason to even be concerned here is asinine.
See herein lies the issue...
quote:
absolutely no reason to even be concerned
is totally different than hair on fire sky screaming about the world is ending and 47 is ruining America and on and on.
quote:
It’s early days since that decision, so this warrants a little more time to see how the situation evolves.
this is how normal people think. not panic and screaming about shredding the constitution.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:39 am to Azkiger
quote:
By not doing what? Kidnapping a MS-13 gang member from his own country and bringing him back here just so we could deport him again?
Are you really arguing Trump is that much of a powerless pussy? He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return? Is that really the hill you want to die on?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:40 am to sidewalkside
Folks that have TDS are inherently flawed somehow. Thier level of cynicism prevents them from seeing reality. IMHO
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:40 am to funnystuff
quote:
He appears to be pretty directly and unequivocally ignoring a 9-0 supreme court order
False
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:40 am to sidewalkside
The default for Leftists to stop something they don't like is to tie it up in the bureaucracy of the court system until those pushing it are out of office or forget about it (being distracted by some shiny, new cause du jour). When they piss and moan about something being unconstitutional without providing the actual means for which it is, what they are usually doing is bitching because whoever is pushing that "something" has found a way to circumvent their lawfare.
To paraphrase a recent quote, when they say "unconstitutional" what they really mean is "unbureaucratic".
To paraphrase a recent quote, when they say "unconstitutional" what they really mean is "unbureaucratic".
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:41 am to PsychTiger
quote:
It "feels" like he is shredding it to them
quote:Spoken with expertise.
PsychTiger
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:41 am to Bard
quote:
When they piss and moan about something being unconstitutional without providing the actual means for which it is, what they are usually doing is bitching because whoever is pushing that "something" has found a way to circumvent their lawfare.
The USSC just had a 9-0 ruling...
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you really arguing Trump is that much of a powerless pussy? He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return?
What the frick does that have to do with whether or not he's shredding the Constitution or not following some non-existent supreme court order? What a desperate post on your part
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:42 am to Azkiger
Don’t be intentionally stupid to try to get a dunk in an argument. It’s not a good look
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The USSC just had a 9-0 ruling
Are you really trying to go with this pathetic argument when the ruling clearly is in favor of the president's position? Look I get that you feel compelled to argue because you're a lawyer but that's fricking retarded
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:42 am to sidewalkside
This is all they've got:
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:42 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
What the frick does that have to do with whether or not he's shredding the Constitution
Read the prior comments and catch up. It's explained even where 1st graders can understand
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you really arguing Trump is that much of a powerless pussy? He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return? Is that really the hill you want to die on?
This is the answer your fishing for, I'll give it to you..... Trump could, if he wanted to.
He doesn't. Trump isn't interested in returning an illegal back into our country, he's trying to get em out!
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:44 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
when the ruling clearly is in favor of the president's position?
I don't think that is nearly as clear as you're projecting
The above comment does not ignore the jurisdiction on issues along with possible overreach by The district Court. Even with those issues the Supreme Court was very clear about the requirements of due process and the necessary facilitation
Posted on 4/16/25 at 7:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return?
Where does it say he needs to negotiate the return of a guy who isn't a US citizen...and why should he?
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News