- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:18 am to td01241
You read as part of the overall problem.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:19 am to 94LSU
We can still do it alone dumbass. It is just going to take longer and make their gas higher.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:20 am to CharlesLSU
I dont care what you think the problem is 
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:21 am to td01241
Of course you don’t. Never intended to change your mind.

Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:22 am to td01241
Seriously, the midterms are toast.
The Dems will gain the house…..and that’s just the beginning.
The Dems will gain the house…..and that’s just the beginning.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:23 am to KCT
so trump told kier starmer thanks but no thanks and now he is pissed because they aren't sending anything? trump needs to get off social media while he is prosecuting a war.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:25 am to CharlesLSU
You should be happy you freaks are going to take over.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:25 am to td01241
Are the "Board of Peace " members helping out?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:26 am to td01241
You can be assured China is watching this very closely
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:27 am to td01241
Trump warned NATO in today's news.
With friends like this, who needs enemies?
With friends like this, who needs enemies?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:28 am to cajunangelle
I dont think he can unilaterally leave it can he?
It would need congress if im not mistaken. Other than to just threaten to not to comply with article 5
It would need congress if im not mistaken. Other than to just threaten to not to comply with article 5
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:30 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
Ukraine and the Iranian conflict are very different. We initiated this one……
We funded Ukraine is what he was saying.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:31 am to msutiger
quote:
I have an idea. Let Ukraine fight their own wars and let Israel fight their own wars.
That's not how it has ever worked.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:33 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:32 am to td01241
quote:
Again, I don’t care,
They should be made to fight.
Why, exactly?
Not only is this our war, but we didn't include them in the decision-making and we've been pretty shitty to them the past year.
That all ignores if this is going to be another Iraq.
And NATO has nothing to do with this, and you know this. We started this war. Article 5 was not triggered
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:32 am to td01241
It’s indeed difficult to often and easily identify the continued benefits this “alliance” has provided to the U.S. in these post decades beyond its original Cold War purpose.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Ok ill rephrase for you
They should not be made to fight
They should be made to hold Ukraine without any of our money or weapons. Which is going to end up making them fight.
Is that better?
They should not be made to fight
They should be made to hold Ukraine without any of our money or weapons. Which is going to end up making them fight.
Is that better?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:34 am to td01241
No help from allies means Trump is going to initiate the draft. I hope your anus is peppered when your son or your arse is sent to Iran to die for Israel
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:35 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:36 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:What happens when these countries are no longer forced to buy our debt?
It’s indeed difficult to often and easily identify the continued benefits this “alliance” has provided to the U.S.
You're about to learn that you need them more than they need you. Won't be long now.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:37 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:37 am to td01241
NATO is for Euro problems not Persian Gulf problems.
The reason we put our money and weapons into Ukraine is because it is beneficial to the United States. If Trump wanted that war over, it'd be over. Despite all his talk, my guess at this juncture is his view of the US strategic interest in supporting Ukraine is in alignment with the Washington consensus on the matter.
The fact that Europe is in alignment with that is mostly incidental to our interest. This was true before Trump and even truer today: the United States does not have allies, it only has interests. Right now, our interest in Iran is not in alignment with most our traditional allies' interests.
Furthermore, we've spent the last year and some change yanking them all around on the matter of trade. You can't call them allies when you browbeat them and lecture them any time we send a VIP over there. If we wanted a coalition of the willing situation, we probably needed to proceed with our other foreign policy/trade agenda far more carefully than it went.
So yeah, no shite, they aren't interested in helping the United States out in a broadly dumbass plan.
The reason we put our money and weapons into Ukraine is because it is beneficial to the United States. If Trump wanted that war over, it'd be over. Despite all his talk, my guess at this juncture is his view of the US strategic interest in supporting Ukraine is in alignment with the Washington consensus on the matter.
The fact that Europe is in alignment with that is mostly incidental to our interest. This was true before Trump and even truer today: the United States does not have allies, it only has interests. Right now, our interest in Iran is not in alignment with most our traditional allies' interests.
Furthermore, we've spent the last year and some change yanking them all around on the matter of trade. You can't call them allies when you browbeat them and lecture them any time we send a VIP over there. If we wanted a coalition of the willing situation, we probably needed to proceed with our other foreign policy/trade agenda far more carefully than it went.
So yeah, no shite, they aren't interested in helping the United States out in a broadly dumbass plan.
Popular
Back to top


1







