- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alex Jones Sues The Onion and Sandy Hook Families Over ‘Rigged’ Auction of Infowars
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If Jones had lied about me if my son or daughter were gunned down, Jones would be running for his life.
Not before i tripped you and dumped their ashes on you. Then i would have said "This is MAGA Country! Leave my Alex Jones alone!"
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:15 pm to JimEverett
quote:
The best way to put it, even if it not 100% accurate, is that the Sandy Hook people are trading the full amount they would receive from the sale of infowars assets for equity in the future company. That is not unusual at all. In fac, the system encourages it because they want the creditors to get the most they can possibly get.
The Onion owning Infowars reduces Infowars value to nearly zero. They aren’t getting equity in the Onion.
It’s a bad trade from a monetary standpoint for the families. It’s based on their desire to prevent Jones from starting over. Welcome to the legal system.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:20 pm to the808bass
quote:
The Onion owning Infowars reduces Infowars value to nearly zero. They aren’t getting equity in the Onion.
It’s a bad trade from a monetary standpoint for the families. It’s based on their desire to prevent Jones from starting over. Welcome to the legal system.
According to the people who own the Onion the Infowars assets do have value and they will capitalize on it. The Trustee, and the Court really don;t care if that is true or not. The families also agreed with the Onion, so the "bad trade" for them argument does not hold merit, they are voluntarily agreeing to it. And the other creditors - the ones that have not agreed to take proceeds from the future company - will get paid more with the Onion's offer.
So, it seems clear why the Trustee chose the Onion's offer and not Jones' offer.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:22 pm to JimEverett
quote:
According to the people who own the Onion the Infowars assets do have value and they will capitalize on it. The Trustee, and the Court really don;t care if that is true or not. The families also agreed with the Onion, so the "bad trade" for them argument does not hold merit, they are voluntarily agreeing to it.
But the Onion is lying to the families and you likely understand that. If the families are ok with getting zero dollars from the sale, that’s interesting. But did the court violate procedure to take a lower bid? That’s the real question.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:35 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:'
I would be more concerned about the person that did this
This lasted 5 years, constant harassment from dipshits like you who worship fake people like Jones.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Maybe that fat frick learned something, eh?
He learned that he isn't the mainstream media, who can run with shite like Russian collusion, and piss tapes, and just about any story they would like, and propagate these lies for years with absolutely no consequences for Hillary, the DNC, the FISA judge, the FBI, or anyone downstream of their fabrication.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This lasted 5 years, constant harassment from dipshits like you who worship fake people like Jones.
I don't give a shite about Jones. But I do give a shite about justice, and the award that was given is judicial overreach.
Jones would've been penalized a small fraction of that had he killed those kids himself in a drunken car wreck.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:46 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I don't give a shite about Jones
quote:
But I do give a shite about justice,
You sound like a progressive. Arbitrators of your own justice.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:49 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Well, his treatment of the Sandy Hook families was objectively horrible.
Therefore….
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:53 pm to SoWhat
quote:
I hope he wins, the Billion-dollar judgement was ludicrous and should be rectified in some nature. It is lawfare censorship
This is right.
Even offensive speech must be protected.
Roger is one of many who have adopted the concept that people need to be protected by government from being offended.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Maybe that fat frick learned something, eh?
Poor Roger.
It’s been a tough couple weeks, huh?
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You sound like a progressive.
You think massive lawsuits over speech are conservative?
You think judicial overreach to purposefully bankrupt media outlets you don't like is conservative?
You think rigged bankruptcy auctions to benefit a preferred side are conservative?
There is NOTHING conservative about this lawsuit, verdict or award.
You're letting your feelings get in the way of rationality.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 12:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You sound like a progressive.
Says the guy advocating for censorship.
While claiming to be on the right.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:00 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
You think massive lawsuits over speech are conservative?
Its not over speech, its the constant harassment for years that ensued.
By people like you, who follow this charlatan.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:01 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Unfortunately that corrective action was far out of proportion to what it should have been.
I suppose this depends on the perspective.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
This isnt a free speech issue.
No govt is forcing him to quit, or putting him in prison
This is 1984 doublespeak.
You just spoke to silencing him them lawfare. This is a corrupt judicial system doing the bidding for his political opponents in a politically hostile area. But of course, I've learned all I need to know about you
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:03 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
You think massive lawsuits over speech are conservative?
Is it the use of the courts (government) that's the progressive part?
This post was edited on 11/20/24 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Thats because youre a man and have kids. These feminine fricksticks posting here arent.
What’s that phrase? The lady doth protest too much, me thinks.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 1:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Pretty easy for a person who has no children to say.
Didn’t your children basically disown you? Do you have contact with them?
Popular
Back to top



0






