- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Al Jazeera Bends The Knee - Leftists In Total Meltdown
Posted on 3/17/26 at 8:20 pm to LSU Patrick
Posted on 3/17/26 at 8:20 pm to LSU Patrick
No no you’re confused sorry I’ll have to correct you.
You see they aren’t weak kneed ladyboys, they just didn’t know our gargantuan military apparatus had thought to make a plan before killing the head of another nation state, once they finally were convinced that we did to their surprise, think about our actions first and not shoot from the hip, they’re MAGA again now.
You see they aren’t weak kneed ladyboys, they just didn’t know our gargantuan military apparatus had thought to make a plan before killing the head of another nation state, once they finally were convinced that we did to their surprise, think about our actions first and not shoot from the hip, they’re MAGA again now.
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 8:21 pm
0
Posted on 3/18/26 at 2:58 am to LSU Patrick
Yep hahaha. And this diat150 weirdo thinks he gets to redefine what 'air superiority' means...as if we'll all suddenly go "oh right, youre right. Iran is kicking our azzes"
They're STOUT, I tell ya. STOUT.
Iran is STOUT.
They're STOUT, I tell ya. STOUT.
Iran is STOUT.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 6:33 am to tide06
quote:
China can replenish
Not if they want oil bitch.
We running that shite now. If they weaponize them, we hit em again and cut shipping
Posted on 3/18/26 at 6:43 am to John somers
The melt is real.
I still can’t believe there are people that wanted Iran to win just because Orange Man bad TDS.
I still can’t believe there are people that wanted Iran to win just because Orange Man bad TDS.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 6:50 am to tide06
quote:
Its always been whether that gets us what we need
Judging by various threads and comments, it would appear quite a few on the board have somehow already made the determination (in under one month’s time) that it has not and is thus, a massive failure.
I think they’re all a bit premature in their assumptions and declarations of disaster, but that’s just me.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:03 am to jbdawgs03
quote:You mean the Chinese high school teacher with a degree in english literature? The one who insists the second Punic war didn't happen and Hannibal didn't exist? How could he possibly be wrong?
But but the random Chinese professor said the US was totally losing
Posted on 3/18/26 at 7:16 am to tide06
quote:
China can replenish their missiles in a week and they’ll be back to their previous shenanigans
quote:
whether we should be doing it in the first place.
Answered your own question.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:36 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Not if they want oil bitch.
Denying China oil would be a great outcome, I just don’t see how having to go back in and cut off all shipping to impact their access everytime we want to do that is a win?
If that’s the goal you need to occupy the island the oil flows through or regime change them completely so it’s a new status quo not a two week interdiction.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 8:50 am to tide06
quote:
China can replenish their missiles in a week and they’ll be back to their previous shenanigans before our carrier groups make it to Cuba for the next stop in their world tour.
Can China replenish their Missiles, without Oil?
How long can they keep it up? No Venezuela, no Iran. Hmmm?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:32 am to tide06
quote:
Denying China oil would be a great outcome, I just don’t see how having to go back in and cut off all shipping to impact their access everytime we want to do that is a win?
Not what I said, but dont let that stop your ignorance
If China wants oil, buy it. If China supplies the weapons, against a US enemy, then consequences will occur.
Trump is doing the opposite of your moronic thoughts. He invited China to come and escorted their oil thru the strait
Posted on 3/18/26 at 3:28 pm to ChatGPT of LA
Just to clarify I wasn’t intending to imply that Trump was going to end Chinese access to oil if he got a proxy government into power, but that right now Iran is a Chinese client state and by ending that Trump would have removed both Chinese oil producing client states.
The threat to their access would be implicit rather than overt as China has done to us with rare earth metals and supply chain access during Covid.
The threat to their access would be implicit rather than overt as China has done to us with rare earth metals and supply chain access during Covid.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 4:50 pm to John somers
quote:
Yep hahaha. And this diat150 weirdo thinks he gets to redefine what 'air superiority' means...as if we'll all suddenly go "oh right, youre right. Iran is kicking our azzes" They're STOUT, I tell ya. STOUT. Iran is STOUT.
Iran air defense just hit a F35 and continues to pummel oil and gas infrastructure to the tune of 10’s of billions of dollars worth of damage with drones and missiles FYI. Keep beating your gums though.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 3/19/26 at 5:00 pm to diat150
quote:
Iran air defense just hit a F35 and continues to pummel oil and gas infrastructure to the tune of 10’s of billions of dollars worth of damage with drones and missiles FYI. Keep beating your gums though.
That just means that the USA and Israel will have to kill every last member of that Regime.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:09 pm to tide06
quote:
Can I just ask how people define a win in Iran?
Easy.
A death to the Islamist Regime. Pull it out by the roots and kill every inch of it. No boots on ground other than maybe around Hormuz as needed. I would use marines to hit targets that require them and not keep them in place for too long. Like how the Royal Navy did the French and Spanish forever. Raid their asses.
Marines hit the beach after ungodly bombardment in a place we won't be opposed in airspace they can't get a live drone into. Let them expose themselves when they counter. Drop the Rangers and the 82nd behind them and leave no throat uncut.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 6/17/26 at 6:57 pm to John somers
quote:
Yep hahaha. And this diat150 weirdo thinks he gets to redefine what 'air superiority' means...as if we'll all suddenly go "oh right, youre right. Iran is kicking our azzes" They're STOUT, I tell ya. STOUT. Iran is STOUT.
Where you at buddy?
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:07 pm to John somers
quote:
quote:
Its air defences have been suppressed to the point at which the US is now flying nonstealth B-1 bombers over Iranian airspace, a decision that signals near-total confidence in air dominance.
lmao
But, but, but..... Iran is so much stronger now!! Lamo.
Seriously, these TDS fricktards around here are pathetic....
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:11 pm to lake chuck fan
In fairness, the article was written before they shot down a non stealth F-15 and eventually an Apache as well
3 month old bumps don't always tell the tale
3 month old bumps don't always tell the tale
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:17 pm to John somers
I'm not sure why this needs to be pointed out, but al Jazeera is a Qatari state operation. Qatar is in the US-Israel coalition against Iran.
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:20 pm to John somers
Ahhh, yes. Get your facts from the news and form an opinions. That’s why we are where we are boomer
Posted on 6/17/26 at 7:45 pm to John somers
quote:
When you look at what has actually happened to Iran’s principal instruments of power – its ballistic missile arsenal, its nuclear infrastructure, its air defences, its navy and its proxy command architecture – the picture is not one of US failure. It is one of systematic, phased degradation of a threat that previous administrations allowed to grow for four decades
quote:
Much of the criticism of the US-Israeli campaign focuses on its costs while treating the status quo ante as if it were cost-free. It was not.
quote:
But the absence of a public diplomatic blueprint does not mean the military campaign is failing. It means the campaign is ahead of the diplomacy, a sequencing problem, not a strategic one. The military conditions for a durable settlement – Iranian missile capacity too degraded to rebuild quickly, nuclear infrastructure inaccessible, proxy networks fragmented – are being created right now.
quote:
But the critics are making a different error: They are treating the costs of action as if the costs of inaction were zero. They were not. They were measured in the slow accretion of a threat that, left unchecked, would have produced exactly the crisis everyone claims to fear: a nuclear-armed Iran capable of closing the Strait of Hormuz at will, surrounded by proxy forces that could hold the entire region hostage indefinitely.
quote:
Iran’s supreme leader is dead, his successor is reportedly wounded and every principal instrument of Iranian power projection – missiles, nuclear infrastructure, air defences, the navy, proxy command networks – has been degraded beyond near-term recovery. The campaign’s execution has been imperfect, its public communication poor and its post-conflict planning incomplete. War is never clean. But the strategy – the actual strategy, measured in degraded capabilities rather than cable news cycles – is working.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News