- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Affecting the outcome of a federal election" tells us everything we need to know
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:22 pm to Smeg
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:22 pm to Smeg
quote:
Who committed a crime in WikiLeaks publishing Hillary's emails?
Remember that sealed indictment of Assange? My guess is we'll know exactly who committed what crime soon enough.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:23 pm to 007tiger
quote:
If he weren't POTUS he'd be indicted.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:25 pm to 007tiger
quote:
007tiger
you burned an alter for this little latest circle jerk?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:39 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
38. On or about February 14, 2017, MICHAEL COHEN, the defendant, sent an executive of the Trump Organization (“Allen Weisselberg“) the first of his monthly invoices, requesting “[p]ursuant to [a] retainer agreement, payment for services rendered for the months of January and February, 2017.” The invoice listed $35,000 for each of those two months. Weisselberg forwarded the invoice to another executive of the Trump Organization (“Executive-2”) the same day by email, and it was approved. Weisselberg forwarded that email to another employee at the Trump Organization, stating: “Please pay from the Trust. Post to legal expenses. Put ‘retainer for the months of January and February 2017’ in the description.”
Executive-2 is likely to be indicted as well. Is that JR. or Eric or Ivanka? They are the ones with permission to authorize Trump org checks.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:44 pm to 007tiger
The donation was a loan, were literally talking about 100s of dollars in implied interest.
This case is stupid, even for stupid New Yorkers and shite sack bob.
This case is stupid, even for stupid New Yorkers and shite sack bob.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:46 pm to 007tiger
You realize paying the money back means it's not a donation right?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:52 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You realize paying the money back means it's not a donation right?
Either a donation or a loan are illegal... so you just owned yourself.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:53 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
This takes basic common sense.
Maybe people wouldn't have voted for someone who cheated on his wife with pornstars.
The dude has been a well known philanderer for 40 years, for Christ's sake
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:55 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You realize paying the money back means it's not a donation right?
Also, since no one ever paid back AMI for the playboy bunny scheme, that is in fact a donation.
I know, so many crimes, so hard to keep up, I understand.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 2:56 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The dude has been a well known philanderer for 40 years, for Christ's sake
Then why the need for these hush money schemes?
Obvious is obvious.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 3:53 pm to 007tiger
quote:
Either a donation or a loan are illegal... so you just owned yourself
Huh? So campaigns can't borrow money?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 3:54 pm to CptBengal
I legitimately don't think I could care less about Trump, Stormy, McDougal, Cohen and whomever.
If this is all they end up getting on Trump color me shocked. I expected him to be way dirtier.
If this is all they end up getting on Trump color me shocked. I expected him to be way dirtier.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 3:55 pm to 007tiger
quote:
Then why the need for these hush money schemes?
To give one less thing for the media to cling to during an election. This isn't rocket science.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 4:01 pm to 007tiger
quote:
Also, since no one ever paid back AMI for the playboy bunny scheme, that is in fact a donation
So AMI allegedly did this out of the kindness of their heart? Or there is an alleged quid pro quo? Or AMI did it to save the country from Hillary?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 4:02 pm to CptBengal
quote:
"Affecting the outcome of a federal election"
The man was running for president. Literally everything he did was with the hope of affecting the outcome of an election. Along with everything every person who has ever run for any office at any level at any point in this country has done.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 5:28 pm to Nguyener
If they indict any one of the Trumps do they realize what they are doing?
Discovery is going to be a BITCH.
Discovery is going to be a BITCH.
This post was edited on 12/12/18 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 12/12/18 at 5:29 pm to antibarner
All of this shite on only appeals to the sky screamers and media anyway. This is what our country has become
Posted on 12/12/18 at 5:35 pm to CelticDog
quote:
hush money prevented the Ohio Mennonites from learning the pussy grabber was up to more than locker room braggadochio.
Trump’s been a playboy forever. It was a surprise to no one. Quit faking outrage Otto.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 6:32 pm to upgrayedd
I'm thinking the Dems aren't stupid enough to proceed with impeachment attempt. But say they succeeded. Of course, the Senate keeps the President from being removed from office. One can see how the dems' ploy would be to disrupt the Trump presidency and his re election.
If the President continues to lead the economy back, win a victory in foreign diplomacy, esp with China and N Korea and builds the wall...he has the savvy as a campaigner to win a second term.
The key word is "If".... I think the probable key here is to let Trump be Trump....live or die. I think it is to live.
If the President continues to lead the economy back, win a victory in foreign diplomacy, esp with China and N Korea and builds the wall...he has the savvy as a campaigner to win a second term.
The key word is "If".... I think the probable key here is to let Trump be Trump....live or die. I think it is to live.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 6:38 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Sorry bud, but telling the truth and revealing facts isn't affecting the outcome in an illegal way.
Does that also apply to Julian Assange?
Popular
Back to top


1









