- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
007tiger
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | kansas city |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | Tiger football |
| Occupation: | student |
| Number of Posts: | 65 |
| Registered on: | 12/29/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
007tiger
Can you control your bleeding
Great comeback, I'm totally changing my mind. :rolleyes:
1
quote:
Are you not aware of the audio tape Cohen surreptitiously took when Trump specifically states that if there is any payment it must be “on the up and up”?
That's not true. The recording shows that Trump is already aware of the catch and kill scheme.
quote:
Are you aware that if trump entered into similar NDAs prior to becoming a candidate that would be a defense to the allleged crime?
If.... Do we know that there are other NDA's? Would be a piece of a defense, but with everything we know, there's no evidence that other NDA's exist pre-election.
quote:
Are you aware the alleged violation is that Cohen made a contribution above the limit. That “contribution” was
Reimbursed, yet the SDNY relies on that reimbursement as evidence of wrongdoing? It’s circular and a bootstrap.
AMI was never repaid their 150,000. So there goes that argument.
quote:
It was a private transaction used with money that never touched the campaign
Wrong. The Trump Org lumped re-payment of his money for Stormy to Cohen with Campaign expenses for "IT services" that cohen provided.
that's campaign expenses.
re: Our President tweets about Muh Cohen!
Posted by 007tiger on 12/13/18 at 8:49 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
You have to be an irrational fool to think Trump couldn't prove he would have paid them off regardless of whether or not he was running for office.
That's hard when they met in 2015 and discussed ways the AMI/National Enquirer could help his CAMPAIGN thru catch and kill. Then they do the catch and kill in 2016.
quote:
Sorry, whose AMI?
they are the parent company of the National Enquirer.
From SDNY:
Corporation-1 is AMI and Magazine-1 is the National Enquirer and Chairman-1 is David pecker.
quote:
At all times relevant to this Information,
Corporation-1 was a media company that owns, among other things,
a popular tabloid magazine ("Magazine-1").
27. In or about August 2015, the Chairman and Chief
Executive of Corporation-1 ( "Chairman-1"), in coordination with
MICHAEL COHEN, the defendant, and one or more members of the
campaign, offered to help deal with negative stories about
Individual-l's relationships with women by, among other things,
assisting the campaign in identifying such stories so they could
be purchased and their publication avoided. Chairman-1 agreed to
keep COHEN apprised of any such negative stories.
quote:
What is your legal expertise? What basis do you have to claim what Trump said is not 100 percent true?
I'm going with the legal experts Judge Nap AND Andrew McCarthy of FOX NEWS.
LINK
Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney
quote:
Dude, Edward actually got campaign donors to pay off his lover to keep quiet and was found not guilty.
Judge Nap thinks the Edwards case defense hurts Trump:
LINK
Napolitano then broke down why exactly Trump’s actions constitute a crime:
quote:
“Unfortunately, the president wasn’t in the courtroom, and the people who were, the federal prosecutors, who had a statement from David Pecker, the guy that owns the — National Enquirer said it was for the campaign, the prosecutors said it was for the campaign, Michael Cohen said it was for the campaign. The president wasn’t there. Maybe he should have had lawyers there. So, if you make an honest mistake in failing to report something, or if you take $100,000 and you’re only supposed to take $2,500, you can correct that by returning the money, paying a fine and correcting the report. If you do this as part of a scheme to hide it, then it’s not a civil wrong, then it’s a crime. That’s what the judge found yesterday.”
quote:
Yea, Cohen was probably looking down the barrel of a gun and chose a knife cut instead. You can’t really blame him for not wanting to spend 20 plus years in the can.
You can't use this same excuse for AMI. They were granted immunity without 20 years behind held over them. How do you want to try to explain that away?
quote:
Haha. Your star witness is a proven liar by the same prosecution team.
Nope your star witness is now AMI and the Trump Org's CFO. They were both given immunity.
quote:
Dude, Edward actually got campaign donors to pay off his lover to keep quiet and was found not guilty.
The BIG Difference is that his campaign donors didn't admit that it was for the purpose of helping his campaign.
All parties, except Trump have now admitted to the principal thing that makes it a crime. That's a huge distinction between this and the Edwards case.
re: Our President tweets about Muh Cohen!
Posted by 007tiger on 12/13/18 at 8:17 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
The prosecution has tapes of Trump telling Cohen to do things on the up and up. Good luck with that.
The prosecution has documentary evidence and testimony from Cohen and AMI stating that they met to discuss ways that AMI could help Trump's campaign. In 2016 they executed that plan. That's as black and white as you get.
quote:
quote:
This, to me, is the lowest Mueller has stooped in this entire charade
What do you expect?? Mueller is the biggest POS we've seen in many decades
And probably the biggest liar/fraud in US history
This is coming from SDNY, not Mueller. So find another false talking point.
Your lawyer-fixer tells you he will create a shell company to pay off a sex partner from 2007, during your election in 2016, & submits false invoices to your company to hide the loan he has made to you to pay her. Good luck with that argument.
quote:
When CNN rigged the debates were they attempting to "affect the election"
Just wondering
Cite the legal code that was violated.
You can't. Because there isn't one.
Meanwhile, you start a whataboutism thread to deflect from the story of AMI flipping on Trump. It's very obvious.
quote:
No, he plead guilty to an actual crime. That's why he's going to be spending 3 years behind bars.
People keep forgetting that Cohen pleaded guilty to a JUDGE. The JUDGE then decides if the evidence meets with the applicable legal code before accepting the plea.
It is impossible to plead guilty to and be imprisoned something that is not a crime.
I think the Trump Org's CFO is quietly the 2nd biggest traitor so far behind Cohen.
That immunity is going to bite Trump and is company when this is all said and done.
That immunity is going to bite Trump and is company when this is all said and done.
quote:
The dude has been a well known philanderer for 40 years, for Christ's sake
Then why the need for these hush money schemes?
Obvious is obvious.
re: "Affecting the outcome of a federal election" tells us everything we need to know
Posted by 007tiger on 12/12/18 at 2:55 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You realize paying the money back means it's not a donation right?
Also, since no one ever paid back AMI for the playboy bunny scheme, that is in fact a donation.
I know, so many crimes, so hard to keep up, I understand.
re: "Affecting the outcome of a federal election" tells us everything we need to know
Posted by 007tiger on 12/12/18 at 2:52 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You realize paying the money back means it's not a donation right?
Either a donation or a loan are illegal... so you just owned yourself.
re: "Affecting the outcome of a federal election" tells us everything we need to know
Posted by 007tiger on 12/12/18 at 2:39 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
38. On or about February 14, 2017, MICHAEL COHEN, the defendant, sent an executive of the Trump Organization (“Allen Weisselberg“) the first of his monthly invoices, requesting “[p]ursuant to [a] retainer agreement, payment for services rendered for the months of January and February, 2017.” The invoice listed $35,000 for each of those two months. Weisselberg forwarded the invoice to another executive of the Trump Organization (“Executive-2”) the same day by email, and it was approved. Weisselberg forwarded that email to another employee at the Trump Organization, stating: “Please pay from the Trust. Post to legal expenses. Put ‘retainer for the months of January and February 2017’ in the description.”
Executive-2 is likely to be indicted as well. Is that JR. or Eric or Ivanka? They are the ones with permission to authorize Trump org checks.
quote:
Who committed a crime in WikiLeaks publishing Hillary's emails?
Remember that sealed indictment of Assange? My guess is we'll know exactly who committed what crime soon enough.
Popular
11
