0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Abdul is an ahole. Don’t be Abdul.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 3:32 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 10/18/26 at 3:32 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
No
Just strictly Muslims.
Thanks. I'm undecided about it.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 3:40 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I'm a Christian Nationalist. l am in the same denomination as Doug Wilson and Pete Hegseth.
CN has a pretty broad semantic domain. Are you saying you take the same flavor of CN that Doug Wilson does?
quote:
I don't think hypocrisy helps anything. When someone wants a Muslim candidate to agree to religious freedom and equal protection of the law...but doesn't think the same protections should apply in favor of Muslims...that's hypocritical.
If I substitute any religion or worldview in place of "Muslim" (2 pl) in your statement above, we still good?
Posted on 10/18/26 at 3:44 pm to blueboy
quote:
Why doesn't this graphic include the U.S.?
Posted on 10/18/26 at 4:11 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:Maybe because the US didn't experience a massive influx of muslim migration in that time.
Why doesn't this graphic include the U.S.?
It simply illustrates what happens when more and more muslims invade your country. But you knew that.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 4:33 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Is the word “but” a qualifier?
If someone asks me if the sky is blue, and I respond “yes, absolutely. But how do you not know that already?”
Does my “yes, absolutely” now amount to equivocation just because a “but” follows?
You guys are letting politics affect your understanding of basic English
Posted on 10/18/26 at 4:38 pm to blueboy
quote:
Maybe because the US didn't experience a massive influx of muslim migration in that time.
It simply illustrates what happens when more and more muslims invade your country. But you knew that.
Interesting
Posted on 10/18/26 at 4:38 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yes. He shifted away from simply answering the question to attacking the reporter for asking it.
So he didn’t qualify his answer. He went on to a new topic (why he was asked the question to begin with). You’re all over the place, bud.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 4:59 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
CN has a pretty broad semantic domain. Are you saying you take the same flavor of CN that Doug Wilson does?
Yes. We recognize that CN might take 250 years to take root in America.
quote:
If I substitute any religion or worldview in place of "Muslim" (2 pl) in your statement above, we still good?
I'm not sure the import of your exact substitution. Under the current Constitution, I don't think anyone could be excluded for office for belonging to a recognized religion.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:00 pm to Green Chili Tiger
So, a bunch of countries where muslims are already the majority and the US, which has 350 mil. people where they aren't nearly as affected statistically as somewhere like Britain.
Those rape stats I posted are 100% because of muslim migrants. That's pretty undeniable.
But again, you knew that.
Those rape stats I posted are 100% because of muslim migrants. That's pretty undeniable.
But again, you knew that.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:07 pm to Jbird
Abdul was angered??? Arguing in favor of allegiance to the US Constitution?
Folks, please watch the question and answer session. It might enlighten you and negate your preconceived notions about this candidate
Folks, please watch the question and answer session. It might enlighten you and negate your preconceived notions about this candidate
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:11 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
If someone asks me if the sky is blue, and I respond “yes, absolutely. But how do you not know that already?”
Does my “yes, absolutely” now amount to equivocation just because a “but” follows?
Not necessarily, but your example did shift the focus from the color of the sky to the knowledge of the inquirer. Those are two different things.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:16 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I'm not sure the import of your exact substitution. Under the current Constitution, I don't think anyone could be excluded for office for belonging to a recognized religion.
Why should it matter which substitution is made since "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"?
"a recognized religion" - recognized by who? How much "recognition" does it take?
This post was edited on 10/18/26 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:19 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Do any other religions "migrate" like Muslims do?
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:23 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Not necessarily, but your example did shift the focus from the color of the sky to the knowledge of the inquirer. Those are two different things.
So? I’m not addressing shifting the focus. I’m addressing claims that the “but” amounted to a qualifier of his previous answer as if the word has no other use in the English language
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:24 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Do any other religions "migrate" like Muslims do?
Jews have the highest migration propensity by far, with 20% living outside their birth country, while Christians make up the largest total number of global migrants at 47%
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:24 pm to tarzana
Muslims lie about their intentions until they don't have to anymore and can carry out their submit or die doctrine. It is in their religious texts to do so in order to spread Islam. But go ahead and vote for this snake and others like him. I say this as a person that doesn't believe in any organized religion. Islam/muslims are dangerous to western society as is being proven right now in Europe.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:34 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Why should it matter which substitution is made since "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"?
"a recognized religion" - recognized by who? How much "recognition" does it take?
I didn't have time for a deep discussion of what constitutes a "religion." I was anticipating a "what if I invented a religion that required members to kill nonbelievers to become members" kind of argument.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 5:38 pm to Powerman
quote:
Which would require destroying the 1st amendment.
No, just modifying/limiting it. For example:
“Amendment 28:
As used in this constitution, “religion” shall not include Islam, or any sect following the teachings of Mohammed or the writings contained in the Koran.”
Let the lawyers clean up the language to remove any ambiguity.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 6:01 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Jews have the highest migration propensity by far, with 20% living outside their birth country, while Christians make up the largest total number of global migrants at 47%
What time frame is this for?
I would love to see the details - who are the 'donor' nations and who are the 'receptor' nations. For example, is this accounting for Jewish migration to Israel from other nations?
As for Christians, I'm not aware of any Evangelicals involved in migration movements unless we're talking missionaries (small %), natural disasters, or those fleeing persecution from commies, Muslims, or Hindus.
Posted on 10/18/26 at 6:20 pm to LSUSUPERSTAR
Did you actually watch the video?
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News