- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A prophecy
Posted on 10/6/24 at 9:26 am to SkiUtah420
Posted on 10/6/24 at 9:26 am to SkiUtah420
I wouldn't look to the Catholic Church as the beacon of light.
Posted on 10/6/24 at 9:29 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Analyzing verifiable facts and evidence using the scientific method is not faith.
Up the point where the facts and observations present you with something that cannot be explained with any models or theories….such as a point of infinite density and temperature from which all matter originated.
The term singularity basically means…we have no idea what happens beyond this point so we’re going to hypothesize (ie guess).
quote:
faith /faTH/ noun 1. complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
The prevailing models cannot explain the behavior of galaxies and other astronomical movements so scientists created the idea of dark matter to explain why this was happening. There has been no evidence dark matter exists other than these movements.
Would you say modern scientists have faith dark matter exists in the universe based on the definition I posted above?
This post was edited on 10/6/24 at 9:49 am
Posted on 10/6/24 at 10:53 am to SkiUtah420
Catholics always thing Catholicism is the answer. Protestants thing Jesus is the answer.
Posted on 10/6/24 at 10:56 am to SkiUtah420
quote:
enlightened era of Christendom
That's an oxymoron
Posted on 10/6/24 at 10:57 am to lsutigerdan
Agree and I thought it was the USA until recently.
Posted on 10/7/24 at 8:44 am to Stitches
quote:Just so I’m clear, you are interpreting this verse to be saying that when we die, we are given a divine nature and have incommunicable traits communicated to us? I just want to confirm you are going down this path.
Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature - 2 Peter 1:4
quote:I’m struggling to take this seriously. Aside from what sounds like you saying we become God-like in our nature when we go to Heaven, the connection one has with God allows one to hear the prayers of the living (I mean this in regard to living bodies) so that they can turn around and pass those prayers on to Him?
It is through God they can hear with no merit of their own.
Posted on 10/7/24 at 8:56 am to SkiUtah420
I'll bite...
quote:for instance?
mainline Protestant churches wither as they preach a false Gospel that is incompatible with a traditional discernment of Christianity.
Posted on 10/7/24 at 9:09 am to SkiUtah420
Seems alot roman catholics are going to Eastern Orthodoxy anyways. My church is full of ex romans.
Orthodoxy is the fastest growing Church in America. Mostly because it was low numbers before and now with the infulx of ex cats. Is it true mass american conversion? Will it ever wield the infulence of protestant churches? i highly doubt both. Orthodoxy tends to be introverted compared to Protestantism. However between icons and Litgury and the ethnic churches (russian, greek, serbian, romanian etc) i think its too much for home grown protestants to overcome and convert on mass.
There will always be coverts, converting both ways. But speaking on mass, i doubt it. What i can see is a modern renewal of protestantism, since thay seems the historical pattern of america. Thats better than nothing.
Im happy i found my little Church, and if people want to say im not Christian due to Catholic- thats between them and Christ.
Lord Jesus Christ Son of God, have mercy on me, the sinner. Most Holy Theotokos, Save Us.
Orthodoxy is the fastest growing Church in America. Mostly because it was low numbers before and now with the infulx of ex cats. Is it true mass american conversion? Will it ever wield the infulence of protestant churches? i highly doubt both. Orthodoxy tends to be introverted compared to Protestantism. However between icons and Litgury and the ethnic churches (russian, greek, serbian, romanian etc) i think its too much for home grown protestants to overcome and convert on mass.
There will always be coverts, converting both ways. But speaking on mass, i doubt it. What i can see is a modern renewal of protestantism, since thay seems the historical pattern of america. Thats better than nothing.
Im happy i found my little Church, and if people want to say im not Christian due to Catholic- thats between them and Christ.
Lord Jesus Christ Son of God, have mercy on me, the sinner. Most Holy Theotokos, Save Us.
This post was edited on 10/7/24 at 9:12 am
Posted on 10/7/24 at 9:34 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
There is absolutely nothing about heretical worship of Mary and praying to mortals that will draw people en masse to Jesus.
Interesting. I'm a cradle Catholic and I've never done either, or seen anyone do either.
Go back to your snake handling and wearing long denim skirts (see, I can make stupid, inaccurate depictions of protestants)
Posted on 10/7/24 at 9:40 am to PrayingMantis
quote:
No one has ever defected from Protestantism to Catholicism but opposite is extremely common. Now why would that be?
LOL. I know dozens, maybe hundreds, of Catholics who are former protestants - including at least 3 priests.
Posted on 10/7/24 at 1:46 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Atheists don’t believe
You sure like to talk about things you don’t believe in.
1- Everything came from nothing. All by itself, the universe (that didn’t exist) somehow decided (while not existing) to create itself. Nothing, doing nothing, to nothing- created everything.
2- Oort Cloud. We can’t see it- but it must be there because we need it to explain things we don’t understand about the universe.
3- Life arose from non-life. The ridiculous complexity of the simplest form of life just accidentally formed, from non-living materials, and started “evolving” into human beings. Like a tornado in a junkyard producing fully functioning automobiles.
4- Life itself is nothing more than a cosmic accident- an undirected series of chemical and physical reactions
5- There is no such thing as objective truth. What’s true for you, is not necessarily true for me. Is that true?
6- There’s no such thing as objective morality. The holocaust was wrong- but only because we agree it was wrong. There is no external, objective standard by which to judge behavior.
7- Love, and hate, are merely chemical reactions in our brains. They don’t have any intrinsic value. They don’t reflect a standard.
8- The appearance of design in all life is merely an illusion-
9- The appearance of design in the universe is merely an illusion. The fine tuning of the universe is merely an astronomicallly impossible coincidence.
10- There is nothing special about humanity. We’re not created in the image of God- we’re no different than the animals.
Bonus: You must believe that you have attained and now possess sufficient knowledge to make a decision that has eternal implications. You must really trust yourself. Regardless of socioeconomic factors, pride is the common denominator of all atheists.
I think (sadly)you’ll be fine with most of those. Or not (sorry if I misrepresented your beliefs). That’s not the point. The point is that you can’t prove your beliefs anymore than I can prove mine. Your position, like mine and literally every one who has or will exist, is one of faith- regarding the existence of God. To even try to disprove the existence of the supernatural, using only the natural- is a fool’s errand to begin with. It’s like checking voltage with a wooden spoon.
In addition to that, the common atheist must continuously steal from the Christian worldview in order to make sense of the world around them. Yet, like a person arguing that air doesn’t exist- while relying on air to make his/her case, the atheist must appeal to an implied common understanding of some fixed position as being true, while simultaneously denying the existence of an objective, external, eternal, perfect being- from which a standard could be derived.
quote:
And who created God? If everything that exists has a cause, and God exists, what caused him to exist?
We’ve been over this.
1- Everything that begins to exist, must have a cause.
2- The universe began to exist.
3- The universe must have a cause.
That’s it. God is eternal, so God does not require a causal explanation. It’s important to note that this argument is not an argument for any particular God. Just the existence of a God. There is no logical weakness to the argument- it all boils down to whether or not the universe began to exist. If it did, then, logically, there must be a cause. And, logically, that cause must be immensely powerful.
Humor me. If the universe could be proven to have a beginning- what could be the cause?
Posted on 10/7/24 at 11:27 pm to Prodigal Son
quote:
1- Everything came from nothing. All by itself, the universe (that didn’t exist) somehow decided (while not existing) to create itself. Nothing, doing nothing, to nothing- created everything.
Quit projecting your fantasies onto others. Just stop it. No atheists believe everything came from nothing. That is you. Not me.
quote:
3- Life arose from non-life. The ridiculous complexity of the simplest form of life just accidentally formed, from non-living materials, and started “evolving” into human beings. Like a tornado in a junkyard producing fully functioning automobiles.
Try some undergrad level chemistry, organic chemistry, and biology courses. You might learn something. Serious.
quote:
4- Life itself is nothing more than a cosmic accident- an undirected series of chemical and physical reactions
Maybe. There’s no evidence of anything else. Are you going to give me some of your god of the gaps arguments?
quote:
5- There is no such thing as objective truth. What’s true for you, is not necessarily true for me. Is that true?
There’s opinions and then there are facts. Only facts that can be demonstrably and evidently true are the truth. Any claim of truth, without evidence, without clarifying it is your personal belief, is a lie.
quote:
6- There’s no such thing as objective morality. The holocaust was wrong- but only because we agree it was wrong. There is no external, objective standard by which to judge behavior.
Go easy on your slaves and concubines and make sure those rebellious children get taught a lesson by the entire town.
quote:
8- The appearance of design in all life is merely an illusion-
Life doesn’t appear designed to me. At least not from the standpoint of the designer actually doing a good and efficient job.
quote:
The point is that you can’t prove your beliefs anymore than I can prove mine. Your position, like mine and literally every one who has or will exist, is one of faith- regarding the existence of God. To even try to disprove the existence of the supernatural, using only the natural- is a fool’s errand to begin with
You sure do love to project. I believe in leprechauns. Why don’t you try to disprove leprechauns. If you do, you’re a fool, right? Or are you a hypocrite?
quote:
In addition to that, the common atheist must continuously steal from the Christian worldview in order to make sense of the world around them
PS, come on man sorry but I think you are losing IQ points. We’ve been over this a hundred times. Atheists aren’t flat earth mouth breathers who justify genocide and killing of women and children. That’s you guys.
quote:
We’ve been over this. 1- Everything that begins to exist, must have a cause. 2- The universe began to exist. 3- The universe must have a cause.
Ok Bill, neither the atheistic argument of cosmic expansion or big bang theory, nor your Bible has a time that that universe didn’t exist. Atheists believe in science which has shown matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed. So the matter and energy that exists now must have always existed. Your Bible starts off with an earth void of form and covered in water before Elohim doesn’t anything to it in Genesis 1. In genesis 2 the earth is a bare barren desert wasteland without water when Yahweh Elohim begins to do something about it. In both contradictory versions of creation in Genesis, the earth is already in existence when your god begins to shape and form it up. If it already existed before your god did anything to it, then it wasn’t created by your god. Your WLC foolishness falls apart when you realize atheists do not believe the universe began to exist. It always existed.
quote:
God is eternal, so God does not require a causal explanation
Because the Bible says so! And we know it’s the truth because it’s the Bible! Right?
quote:
If the universe could be proven to have a beginning- what could be the cause?
No telling. Maybe what you’d consider a god. But it damn sure wasn’t that jealous liar and murderer from the beginning you call “God”.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 8:12 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Atheists believe in science
That’s my point. I put my faith in God- you put your faith in man. I’m not saying that either one of us is demonstrably right or wrong- to the contrary. I’m saying that we’re both acting on faith.
Posted on 10/8/24 at 12:12 pm to Prodigal Son
quote:
I’m saying that we’re both acting on faith.

Popular
Back to top

0







