re: 83 Ethics complaints against Kavanaugh dismissed.

quote:

---

texridder Bokke ebbandflow tigerindc09 spock’s Eyebrow toddy These turds need to turn in their man cards for treating kavabaw like dirt

---

Piss on them, they are just shitbirds on a message board. How about Feinstein, Klobuchar, Coons, Blumenthal, Booker, and Harris? You know there is an assload of ethics violations in that group.

quote:

---

So, that story is in the NYT?

---

Don't know. It's barely even a story. Is it even on Foxnews?

This is actually one of the bigger non stories you'll see. By definition, the panel that Roberts set up lost their jurisdiction when Kav was confirmed. The statute says a panel can investigate lower court judges (only). The process for "investigating" SCOTUS judges is right in the Constitution - impeachment.

The only question is why did they wait so long to issue this obvious ruling.

The OP is very confused.

That occurred on December 18, 2018. Not sure why your linked article thinks that is news.

The complaints against Kavanaugh were dismissed by the 8th Circuit because ethics complaints don't apply to Supreme Court Justices, not because they were considered and dismissed.

quote:

---

That occurred on December 18, 2018. Not sure why your linked article thinks that is news.

The complaints against Kavanaugh were dismissed by the 8th Circuit because ethics complaints don't apply to Supreme Court Justices, not because they were considered and dismissed.

---

This thread is sort of a very fun fail in all regards.

quote:

---

Doesn't this outcome show that the talking point of "ruined his life" is simply silly? His life isn't even marginally ruined. He'll be on the SCOTUS, likely for the rest of his life - i.e. he has achieved his lifelong goal which 99.9% of aspirants will never achieve.

---

Wow...and every time someone googles his name, guess what they are gonna find???

They ain't gonna find "Bat shiite crazy woman lies about SCOTUS Judge."

I know it's hard for you libturds to understand, but some value their integrity, honor, and our reputation more than any economic gain...

quote:

---

So, that story is in the NYT? Don't know. It's barely even a story. Is it even on Foxnews?

---

Well, you don't read the NYT and I don't watch Fox news. So, why did respond to my question without answering it?

quote:

---

Doesn't this outcome show that the talking point of "ruined his life" is simply silly? His life isn't even marginally ruined. He'll be on the SCOTUS, likely for the rest of his life - i.e. he has achieved his lifelong goal which 99.9% of aspirants will never achieve

---

I didn't say his life was ruined. I said that launched an attempt to ruin his life. They're upset that he fought back. I know you can't read, but goddamn.

quote:

---

I didn't say his life was ruined. I said that launched an attempt to ruin his life. They're upset that he fought back. I know you can't read, but goddamn.

---

And I didn't say that you said it. That was the big talking point at the time that I argued against. Nobody's life was going to be ruined, whether he was confirmed or not.

I do agree that a lot of people that piled on gleefully wanted his life ruined. For them, I offer no defense whatsoever.

But the main lady with the accusations made them in writing when Kav's name was just on a long list. I think she deserves at least some credibility simply due to that.

But in any event, the OP's intent really missed the mark here. Nothing about this month-old "story" has the effect that he is claiming it has.

Damn saltine rapists always getting off scot free.

Wonder what Tobin thinks of this!