- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:30 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
It's about to get a lot easier to balance the budget....

Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:30 pm to Kjnstkmn
I am sure there is an insane amount of billions of dollars of fraud here but the math this guy is using is not exactly how it works (20 years in tax accounting work)
Your SS payments are basically dependent on a % of what you paid in with some other formulas thrown in there. If there is some SS# that didn't put a cent into the system, the system is so you are not getting paid social security. It is an earned benefit. (not talking about any other benefits outside of retirement)
Some of these in the 100+ age range could be some fake SS# that was created back in the 1930s and doesn't have a penny paid in to their name.
We actually need to see the actual payments made to those over the 100+ or so age range before we can have any clue how much is being paid to dead people.
Your SS payments are basically dependent on a % of what you paid in with some other formulas thrown in there. If there is some SS# that didn't put a cent into the system, the system is so you are not getting paid social security. It is an earned benefit. (not talking about any other benefits outside of retirement)
Some of these in the 100+ age range could be some fake SS# that was created back in the 1930s and doesn't have a penny paid in to their name.
We actually need to see the actual payments made to those over the 100+ or so age range before we can have any clue how much is being paid to dead people.
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:31 pm to AFtigerFan
quote:
This should be really easy to prove that fraud occurred. Just see where the money went. If money went to even one of these 200-year old people, then there's no denying it. But, and this is just my opinion, the fact that they haven't highlighted even one instance where people in this database were paid, it could be a huge nothing.
Yep, easy to track.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:33 pm to Tupelo
quote:no it’s not; especially if it was purposefully done
but it is hard to believe fraud on this scale would go undetected for any length of time.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:39 pm to dcbl
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:43 pm to AFtigerFan
quote:
This should be really easy to prove…
quote:
Yep, easy to track.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:44 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
quote:
I can already see the reaction from the left to this news
reddit these days is an absolute gold mine of entertainment because of how left leaning the vast majority of it is. I was reading comments on this article (can't even remember what sub it was, nothing I've subscribed to it was just one of the recommended ones in the home feed) and as expected it's hundreds and hundreds of comments calling Musk an idiot, saying he set the parameters wrong, saying they talked to their buddy that knows code and elon definitely fricked up, he's blatantly lying, etc.. Like this dude is one of the smartest and most successful people on the planet but yeah I'm sure these basement dwellers on reddit know much better..
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:45 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
death field set to FALSE!"
exactly what does that mean and how is it assigned?
my impression from the tone of the article is that those are dead people who have been once removed from the payout file, but then later having the death notice override - i.e. labeled FALSE - and those funds are then shunted off to some ghost account for fraudulent dispersal.
What other implication is there>
i.e. - what does FALSE mean and how is it assigned and by whom and for what reason.
Seems improbable that there would be a lot of 'death' input for living people that would necessitate that kind of remediation.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:46 pm to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:47 pm to Kjnstkmn
Also happening at the same time:
Truth - Se n. Rand Paul encouraged Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency to audit the country's gold reserve at Fort Knox
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Truth - Se n. Rand Paul encouraged Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency to audit the country's gold reserve at Fort Knox
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:47 pm to Kjnstkmn
And this $100 B, $200 B, $300 B oversight somehow escaped the scutiny of decades of fed govt control from both parties and bipartisan oversight organizations? When both parties made deals to close the deficit ?
forgive me if I dont believe Musk until he comes out with actual proof of any number approaching that large figure.
forgive me if I dont believe Musk until he comes out with actual proof of any number approaching that large figure.
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:49 pm to Tupelo
quote:
Are these people collecting benefits, or are they merely listed as having active Social Security numbers? If it's the latter, then there exists a systemic problem in clearing people out of the system after their death (which seems more believable than massive fraudulent payments to deceased people). Not that massive fraud couldn't have happened, but it is hard to believe fraud on this scale would go undetected for any length of time.
Why is it hard to believe? We never audited anything at any point. The treasurer never once denied or looked into any payment at any point. (He quit btw once that news dropped). These people have been stealing our money, it's that simple.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:49 pm to Tupelo
The bizarre part is you receive a SSA-1099 for the benefits you receive during the year. So if you have all of these SSA-1099s that go out there without any corresponding tax return being filed, that would send up a red flag with them.
Yes there are plenty of cases where people don't need to file a return if you are below the threshold for your filing status but that is 20 million IRS transcripts that are on record every year with SS Income on them but nobody is filing a single tax return. Sorry but if you are over 100, you are probably relatively wealthy enough to stay healthy enough to be alive. You would be filing tax returns. People who are poor enough not to have to file a tax return are probably not living past 90 and that is generous. The IRS also does a lot of budgeting when they decided how much of SS payments are going to be taxable on a given year and how much revenue they should pull in from them. Say for every $ of SS paid out, they get 2 pennies in income tax. This would completely throw their budgets off if 1/3 of all SS payments were to fake people.
Just seems like, in order for this to have to fly so far under the radar, there would have to be somebody making it so there are no SSA-1099s going out. Because the IRS has never been ones to let some old helpless person miss a payment that they expect.
Yes there are plenty of cases where people don't need to file a return if you are below the threshold for your filing status but that is 20 million IRS transcripts that are on record every year with SS Income on them but nobody is filing a single tax return. Sorry but if you are over 100, you are probably relatively wealthy enough to stay healthy enough to be alive. You would be filing tax returns. People who are poor enough not to have to file a tax return are probably not living past 90 and that is generous. The IRS also does a lot of budgeting when they decided how much of SS payments are going to be taxable on a given year and how much revenue they should pull in from them. Say for every $ of SS paid out, they get 2 pennies in income tax. This would completely throw their budgets off if 1/3 of all SS payments were to fake people.
Just seems like, in order for this to have to fly so far under the radar, there would have to be somebody making it so there are no SSA-1099s going out. Because the IRS has never been ones to let some old helpless person miss a payment that they expect.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:50 pm to Kjnstkmn
The Democrats will be melting down over this.
How dare a non elected person dig into our "personal grifting system" I mean data.
Like Maxine Waters said "We don't even know what he has on us".
How dare a non elected person dig into our "personal grifting system" I mean data.
Like Maxine Waters said "We don't even know what he has on us".
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:54 pm to Kjnstkmn
If this is proven, every hardworking American should be irate regardless of party affiliation. SS has been a huge concern for a very long time and for DOGE to come in and find this major issue in only a matter of weeks infuriates me of past administration’s complete lack of accountability and simply looking into it!!!
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:58 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:what you do is hire a crack team of autists to comb through the data. That's if you want to really want to know. If you want the fraud to continue, you get corrupt DAs to go judge shopping and try to stop the auditing.
Further, what is that amount and how do we use the data to determine who is actually alive and who is deceased, and who is a ghost account siphoning off money into an offshore accoun
Posted on 2/17/25 at 1:58 pm to Tupelo
quote:.
Not that massive fraud couldn't have happened, but it is hard to believe fraud on this scale would go undetected for any length of time.
You assume someone was looking for it.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 2:01 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
I was wondering if the data has reported, how many of those accounts (social security numbers) are, in fact, receiving benefits.
Yeah, based on what was directly quoted vs implied, it's hard to tell if "eligible social security numbers" or "death field set to false" equates to fraudulent monthy SS checks. I'm sure there is fraud in SS, skeptical that it's that much. Numbers like $793B a year are usually reserved for politicians, bureaucrats, and the people who control them.
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 2:02 pm
Popular
Back to top


1






