Started By
Message

re: 72 years ago today, the U.S. dropped 15 kilotons of freedom onto Japan

Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80941 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

My grandmother often said, and my father who was a Marine in the Pacific Theater, that the dropping of the bomb probably saved his life. Dad was in the Pacific three years, in several battles, rarely spoke of the war, but did say the Japanese were intent on fighting to death, so there.


One of the younger members of the Ebola Gay crew asked an officer if he thought the new bomb would end the war. The officer said (based on what he heard from others) that it would, but we might need more than one.
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6174 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:12 pm to
Definitely no curve of the earth in that pic. This proves that our planet has been flat since at least 1945. Check mate, Sphereists!
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 9:19 pm
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17551 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Why? It is one of the most stirring examples of the power and beauty of the human mind.


I bet if you think really hard you might be able to figure it out.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:23 pm to
quote:


Well here's our first Monday-morning quarterback.

Your expertise to claim this is what exactly?



Soviet Unions entry into the war flipped the script. Japan was already negotiating surrender when the bombs were dropped. Not exactly what they teach in American schools though. Truman insisted on unconditional surrender and the negotiations were held up because the japanese didn't want their emperor to be tried for war crimes. He instead elected to kill 225,000+ Japanese citizens. Japan eventually surrendered unconditionally but MacArthur let the emperor have his way out assuring diplomats that "I have no desire whatever to debase [Hirohito] in the eyes of his own people” and not treating him as a war criminal.

U.S military estimates at the time indicated that the U.S. would have suffered 200,000 casualties (40,000 deaths, 160,000 non-lethal injuries) if Japan was invaded. They would have lost a lot more than the 225k+ that died if we had to invade, though. That place would have lit up like a matchbox.
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 9:28 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Haven't you ever heard of a killer?


What are you trying to say??
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9957 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure most of the southeastern and midwestern part of the country will be saying that if California gets hit by a nuke. And when we're done laughing we'll hit North Korea one hundred fold.


You would laugh if California was hit by a nuke? What kind of fricked up loser are you?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:25 pm to
You live in a fantasy world.
Sad.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

You're pretty messed up. I'm sure you won't be saying that if Kim Jung Un lobs one on you in California.

This is a nonsense comment.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Anywho, I hated the fact that we had to drop the bomb. But, when you are attacked, you must respond.


The main factors were

(1) loss of life projections of a mainland invasion. It was over 1 million US troops (would have tripled our losses in WWII) and millions of Japanese soldiers and civilians. 100k+ lost in Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved both US and jap lives

(2) Russia was starting to get involved in the war effort and would have wanted more say in post WWII Japan. Think proxy wars, or even Berlin Wall post WWII. US didn't want this so a quick end was needed
Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

I understand that it was a necessary evil, but I won't cheer for the deaths of civilians like that.

You did not live during that time, so what gives you the right to say people cheered because civilians died. My father was in the Pacific and I can assure you if you knew what fighting the Japanese suicidal soldier was like you might not give a shite about anyone from Japan in those days. Attitudes mellow with age, but as a first year babyboomer, I can tell you there was not a bunch of empathy for those people.

Now, turn that around and look what the free world, predominantly the U.S., did for Japan post war and what her people enjoy today. Not withstanding they never apologized for the murdering of over 2000 U.S. military in Pearl Harbor. They would have sacrificed their three year old children had we been forced to invade.

Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

I understand that it was a necessary evil, but I won't cheer for the deaths of civilians like that.



I don't know about that, but I cheer any squint death that demoralized those savages into surrender. Others may feel differently.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:30 pm to
quote:


You did not live during that time, so what gives you the right to say people cheered because civilians died.


What? I meant like OP.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

You would laugh if California was hit by a nuke? What kind of fricked up loser are you?


You're confused.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42088 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

It was pure malice and vengengce by the British who wanted revenge over the Blitz.


Yeah...well can't say I blame them
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80941 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

What are you trying to say??




Dr. Dre reference.

"Haven't you ever heard of a killer? I drop bombs like Hiroshima."
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71163 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

You would laugh if California was hit by a nuke?


Yes, but not for too long.

quote:

What kind of fricked up loser are you?


The kind of loser who hates California. Any more questions?



Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

What? I meant like OP.

He did say "May it never happen again". I think you miss his intent, the cheering is relative to these weapons ending the war in a relatively short span of time and lives lost.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:07 pm to
The atomic bomb was a blessing not a curse for Japan. US and Russia would have hacked their way through the mainland for years killing millions of Japanese troops and even more civilians

While tragic that many innocents died, many more Japanese boys and men went home to their families and no longer had a war to fight

That's not even mentioning what post WWII Japan might look like in the alternative scenario. Likely similar to the Korean Peninsula today
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 10:12 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

Geared up for 8 pages of idiots saying the bombs didn't save more lives than they took.


I mean, they didn't. Japan was on the brink of surrendering and would have months earlier had we simply told them we wouldn't imprison/execute the emperor. The bombs were a show of force for the Soviets to see.

That being said, this:

quote:

Don't start none, won't be none.


Is absolutely true. Japan brought it all on themselves and had it coming.
Posted by bigbowe80
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
3767 posts
Posted on 8/6/17 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately a useless act of violence


It probably saved 10 times as many lives as it took chief. An invasion of Japan had conservative estimates of killing millions of Japanese and hundreds of thousands of Americans. You have to understand, at that time, the empire of Japan practiced widespread Shintoism and empower worship ( essentially they believe the emperor was a god and their nation was the chosen dominate race on earth). They would not have surrendered as long as the emperor told them to fight. That means every man, woman, and child on the island was prepared and ready to fight the enemy to the death. Even after the two nukes were dropped many civilians and military personnel strongly disagreed with surrender. What better option would you have taken?
This post was edited on 8/6/17 at 10:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram