re: 7-12 Jurors selected

quote:

---

Convenient that you left out Fox News.

---

If you want to deflect from the point which is that we don't have any objective news mainstream news agencies in the US anymore fine, but nowhere did I state that Fox is objective nor do I spend any time wondering what Paul Ryan is going to tell his group of paid actors to say that day.

They are all paid to divide us against each other so we cant get together to deal with the people robbing us blind of our taxes and freedoms by telling both sides half truths.

The devil in the bible doesn't deceive people by telling us things that are entirely false, but instead uses half truths to bury his agenda. Whatever your views on Christianity there is a great lesson to be had in understanding that in order to trick people you have to start with something they know is true and that is what we see daily. A mix of truth used to spin an agenda that differs depending on what group is being catered to.

Until both sides realize they're being misled and understand that BOTH parties are owned by the same people working for the same purposes using deception to advance their agenda we wont see any positive improvements and will likely continue to spiral towards some sort of domestic cultural breakdown.

quote:

---

They could live here on the Political Board.

---

This is why you fail. No one 'lives' on the PoliBoard. People actually live in the bubble that is NYC. It actually shapes them, because they know nothing else

The first juror, who will act as foreman, is an immigrant from Ireland. He is a married, childless salesman described as having “some” college education. He said he receives his news from the New York Times, Daily Mail, far-left MSNBC, and centrist Fox News;

The second juror is a native New Yorker. She is an unmarried, childless oncology nurse who lives with a fiancé. She said she receives her news from the New York Times and CNN;

The third juror is originally from Oregon. He is an unmarried, childless corporate lawyer. He receives his news from The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Google;

The fourth juror is from Puerto Rico. He is married, has adult children and two grandchildren, and runs an IT business. He describes Trump as someone who “makes things interesting”;

The fifth juror is an unmarried, childless black woman who teaches English in a public charter school, with a master’s degree. She has said that as a person “of color” she has friends with strong views on Trump. She is the only juror selected so far who claims to be unaware of the other criminal cases against him;

The sixth juror is unmarried and childless and lives with a trio of roommates. She is described as a recent college graduate who works as a software engineer at a large broadcaster. She receives her news from the New York Times, Google, Facebook, and TikTok;

The seventh juror is originally from North Carolina and lives in Upper East Side Manhattan. A lawyer, she is married with two children. She receives her news from the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, and Washington Post and claims she doesn’t “have opinions about [Trump] personally.

quote:

---

#5 and that last sentence. That's a damn lie.

---

I am convinced that the majority of the US populace is utterly uninformed and unaware of the world around them.

It is a sad commentary on the state of this nation, but I have no difficulty at all accepting the premise that someone might have some vague notion that there is a lot of Trump-related litigation ongoing, without having any idea what is criminal, what is civil, what is regulatory, or where any of it is pending.

Unmarried and childless.

This doesn't seem like it should be right. Dismissed juror has been a U.S. citizen for less than a year.

It's a huff hit piece https://www.yahoo.com/news/dismissed-trump-juror-says-former-174906628.html

quote:

---

It was quite a moment for Kat, who said this was the first time she was called to be a juror after getting U.S. citizenship last August.

---

quote:

---

Agree. I will never serve on another jury. It’s not what I wear, but they will know how little respect (none) I have for the judicial system. We have crossed the rubicon and no one on the demorat side gives a shite and 80% of the republicans support what’s going on with the two tier justice system.

How do I know? I hear crickets from the republicans and no action. None.

---

I don't think it is so much that they support it as it is they do not want to be the next target of it. That is not support. That is fear.

No, they aren't. A dumpster full of garbage is not as bad as a dumpster full of burning garbage.

quote:

---

Complete liar.

---

Definitely lying.