Started By
Message

re: 40 hours a week ? No way!

Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:04 am to
Posted by TigerV
Member since Feb 2007
2842 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:04 am to
I have no issue with people who want to work less. Let them find a job/career that they can do that. Others have other priorities and goals.

For me - I am still trying to figure out how this lady is having trouble with life. She sleeps 9hrs a day and works 10 hrs a day (unless she is considering her commute a part of her workday). I am up at 4:15 for a workout, catch a bus at 6 to get to work at 7 and then catch a 4pm bus back home. Maybe get another 30-45 min workout in or hit the road and pick up kids from after school stuff. Dinner then in bed between 9:30-10. It’s long days, but make it happen. Every other Friday off helps, but that is the life we chose.

I know there are people who work at bike shops or backpacking shops in the mountains - put in their time and enjoy the outdoors everyday. That’s the life they chose, and good for them. It’s about your own priorities and the sooner you can figure that out the better.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59232 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:08 am to
quote:

But you tend to take that premise and over apply it such that you deny anything is true or reflective of a trend in thought that anyone posts on social media.


You're right. I don't watch 99% of the videos posted here, especially after reading comments that only serve to ridicule her looks or some other trivial thing without addressing the content of the video (in this case). So I'm unable to extrapolate these individual videos to society as a whole.

To speak to your point about me being "above it all" - I do hope I'm "above" these low-brow threads and I think most posters are better than how they portray themselves in these types of threads.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16724 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:15 am to
Abolish all forms of welfare for the able bodied and they will get a job, or maybe two jobs.

Or they will starve, or get shot in the face when they try to rob someone.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14342 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Abolish all forms of welfare for the able bodied and they will get a job, or maybe two jobs.

Or they will starve, or get shot in the face when they try to rob someone.
Yep! If anything, our society makes it way too easy for people to be lazy bums.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62110 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:32 am to
quote:

4cubbies


This is so common these days.

The content of something bothers someone...so they lash out and passively play defense rather than address this underlying issue.

This woman is helpless. It's sad. It's generally reflective of the liberal woman with emotional issues. She can't function at even a basic level. Yet, she is convinced she is smart and the problem is with the system.

Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
16894 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:34 am to
quote:

I think most posters are better than how they portray themselves in these types of threads.


Probably not
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
16894 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:39 am to
It sounds like she just doesn't want the structure. That's fine. Go figure out something else to do to provide for yourself then. Just don't ask us to provide for you.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59232 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:41 am to
quote:

The content of something bothers someone.


The content doesn't bother me. The faux "discussion" bothers me. People aren't discussing anything. They are insulting a stranger and bragging about their own perceived accomplishments.

quote:

This woman is helpless. It's sad. It's generally reflective of the liberal woman with emotional issues.


And the men choosing to insult her for pages and pages are acting out of logic and reason - NOT emotion?

give me a break.

Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35600 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:48 am to
I can't remember the last time I worked less than 50 hours a week. I think it was around 2004.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62110 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:48 am to
quote:

The content doesn't bother me
quote:

The faux "discussion" bothers me. People aren't discussing anything. They are insulting a stranger and bragging about their own perceived accomplishments.



They are insulting a stranger for what she's saying...which is an admission that she cannot function and work a full time job. It's kind of crazy that you view being able to function with a full time job as an accomplishment.

quote:

And the men choosing to insult her for pages and pages are acting out of logic and reason - NOT emotion?



Yes. It's a rational, logical assessment of this woman for what she is saying.

FFS, this woman isn't able to hold down a job and bathe...and she doesn't find any fault with herself and furthermore thinks she is smart.

quote:

give me a break.



This bothers you which is why you are complaining so much. And, your response just proves what I I'm saying. Rather than acknowledge this person as having a real problem you've decided to blame everyone else for pointing it out.

Your response is a microcosm of the emotional liberal woman that results in people like the person in the video existing.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89299 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

But why?

Is your life goal to work or to make money?



u cannot be this dumb. it helped me invest and get ahead. it allowed me to keep over 50% of what i make to invest in business.

you just live on EBT, welfare or disability huh?
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1838 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:57 am to
quote:

it helped me invest and get ahead. it allowed me to keep over 50% of what i make to invest in business.


Was you goal to work, or to make money? It isn’t a difficult question.

If your goal is just to ‘work hard’ then I assume you don’t care what you are paid.

If your goal is to make money, then I assume you would have made your investments with starter / gift money if it were available.

If neither was your goal, then I don’t know why you would reapond to my binary question.
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 11:01 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10666 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Thanks to the men who have ruled our government and economy for hundreds of years, most women now have to do both.


That's true, and you know how they finally made that happen?

Feminism.

Wealthy industrialists (men) basically bankrolled feminism to make sure it happened. They wanted more cheap labor for their factories. They got it.

quote:

I'm a parent of small children.


Yeah. So is your husband. So what?

quote:

Mothers are the primary caregivers of their children (and husbands).


Right. Thanks for continuing to prove my point.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1838 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Wealthy industrialists (men) basically bankrolled feminism to make sure it happened. They wanted more cheap labor for their factories.


I had never put the pieces together until seeing your post.

Thanks
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 11:05 am
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
11001 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

40 hours should be the bare minimum you work a week.

-Workaholics
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 11:09 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10666 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:11 am to
quote:

I have no issue with people who want to work less.


This is equivocation IMO.

What the, "Well, no one ever regretted not working more on their deathbed" comments are ignoring is the degree to which this woman "wants to work less." And as with so many things in life, degree matters a lot here.

She's acting like the standard 40 hour workweek is tantamount to death by torture, and she therefore literally refused to do it. Like, at all. She literally stated that a 40 hour workweek was so intense that she didn't have time to attend to personal hygiene.

That's different than, "I wonder how I can arrange my life so that I can spend fewer hours working and have more free time. I'll have to give up XYZ, but that's o.k. with me, the time matters more to me. I know I'll have to put in some time now to eventually reach my goal, but I have a (2, 5, 10) year plan to get there."

She's not doing that. She's being so overdramatic and ridiculous about a standard workweek that it reveals a significant character flaw.

Look, I retired at 54. I don't do anything these days except what I want to do, despite having guys tell me things like, "I just couldn't do that, I couldn't stand not being productive." And of course, what they are really doing is criticizing me for not being productive enough in a backhand way.

So I get it. I could have kept my business until I was 65 or so. Sold it then, made a lot more money. I have everything I need, but I'm not retired in luxury. I'm not yachting around the world or anything. I could have made more and retired later with (much) more.

But I too am a "work to live" person. I understand, "Nobody ever wished they had worked more hours on their deathbed."

The difference between me and the woman on the video is that I understood that in order to eventually be a "work to live" person, I first had to be a "live to work person." And I was. I put in the hours, the time, the effort, endured the grind, and took the financial risk to make it happen.

In other words, I earned the right to sit at home and only do what I want when I want.

She just thinks she's owed that ability. It doesn't work that way.
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 1:51 pm
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1838 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

my goal is to work as few hours possible while making the most money possible


Amen.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10666 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

To speak to your point about me being "above it all" - I do hope I'm "above" these low-brow threads...


I think you do more than hope.

I think making sure people know you are above it all is the primary reason you post here.

Otherwise, it doesn't make much sense that you keep coming back, does it?
Posted by RicoSuave2025
Member since Jan 2025
269 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 11:46 am to
I’d like to congratulate LA for banning the use of ebt cards to purchase candy and energy drinks. Tax dollars should only be used for necessities. Next on the banned list: 20 packs of pork chops, little Debbie cakes, and last but not least ribeyes. I’m all for helping the truly needy get necessities. I’m tired of watching the lazy freeloaders swipe an EBT card to buy pork chops, chips, koolaid, and little Debbie cakes as they walk out with 3 kids under 5. Rarely see anything for the kids and then they get into their 2024 SUV. Very carefully opening the door to that new SUV bc they just got their nails done.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59232 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

That's true, and you know how they finally made that happen?

Feminism.


Men blaming women for every single problem is an innovative approach I've never seen employed here before. lol.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram