re: 2023 March For Life (Edit: Pics Added!)

quote:

---

Aren't you the clever little fellow?

---

Pointing out your stupidity doesn’t require cleverness.

quote:

---

BTW, Bay, how long did it take to confirm my prediction?

---

Predicting that people will call out your very well known stupidity and overall shittiness as a human being isn’t notable and doesn’t make you clairvoyant.

quote:

---

A fetus is not a fully formed human being.

---

What about "fully formed" gives a living human being a right to life that a partially formed living human being doesn't have? If I lose an arm, am I not full any longer, or is it the arbitrary distinction that I was once fully formed that gives me a right to life? If a child is born without an arm, is it not considered fully formed and worthy of life in your estimation? What other defects, deformities, and imperfections are allowable in your view that give a living human being value and worth to live?

You have to recognize the arbitrariness of the statement "fully formed" in your statement.

quote:

---

A woman is, and has rights to choose medically what happens to her body.

---

She does have the right to choose what she does to her body, so long as she is not harming another living human being in the process.

quote:

---

And I find it amazing that people have such compassion for something that isn't developed or born and zero compassion once it's popped out of that vagina

---

Why do you think those of us who are fighting against abortion don't have compassion for children after they are born? You think we would celebrate mothers and fathers murdering their children once they are out of the womb?

quote:

---

Because the second one brings up the cost to society and paying for the millions of new kids being born they clam up and say fvck no that's the mother's responsibility don't look at me.

---

1) Prior to Roe, adoptions, in general, were MUCH more common and widespread. My maternal grandmother and my aunt on my father's side were adopted from orphanages. There are an estimated one MILLION people who want to adopt a child in the United States.

2) Churches were much more active in supporting families prior to Roe and The Great Society and I suspect many churches would/will become much more active in family support as abortion laws become more restrictive in the most conservatively Christian areas.

In summary, there were not millions of babies being starved or thrown in trash cans before 1965. Society functioned perfectly well (much better actually) when abortion was not legal and there was no real family safety net provided by the government. In other words, no evidence supports anything you say.

quote:

---

Because the second one brings up the cost to society and paying for the millions of new kids being born they clam up and say fvck no that's the mother's responsibility don't look at me.

---

That may be true for many, yet that's not necessarily due to a lack of compassion. I can have compassion on my son who broke the law and has to go to jail while telling him that he still needs to pay for his crime. I can also have compassion on those mothers (and their children) who have to struggle in poverty due to their poor choices even if I cannot afford to cut each one of them a check for living expenses each month.

However, you should not conflate the issue of poverty with the issue of abortion, regardless of whether or not one affects the other to any degree, because they are two separate issues that should be dealt with separately. Poverty exists even with abortion as an option, and abortion being outlawed won't do away with poverty. Both can be considered separately.

If you want to have a discussion about poverty and the welfare state, we can do that, but don't think that those who think personal responsibility should exist before conception, during pregnancy, and after birth are somehow heartless because there isn't (currently) a huge movement to combat poverty like there is to combat abortion.

quote:

---

Your tough love approach isn't to the mother but the newborn kid though who did nothing, so you are punishing them who are innocent for their mothers "mistakes". There's no compassion at all

---

What punishment? You act as if those families are owed something that is being withheld from them. That’s not the case. And with the welfare state being as it is, even the impoverished in our society are well fed, clothed, and sheltered.

quote:

---

And that should tell you everything you need to know about compassion

---

Compassion is overflowing for those children who are murdered, mostly out of convenience. The reason why there isn’t a movement against poverty in this country is because the welfare state allows the poor to live like kings compared to the poor in just about every other country. It’s much more pressing to stop the murder of innocents.

I don’t think you can complain about a lack of compassion when you support the murdering of innocent children. Would you support the mass killing of the homeless and feeble out of “compassion” for their plight? It seems like your solution to hard situations is to kill people.

Don't you, whatever other trolls have appeared, and Displaced Buckeye have anything better to do then argue in a march for life thread?

quote:

---

so you are punishing them who are innocent for their mothers "mistakes".

---

So your solution is to kill them first?

quote:

---

It’s much more pressing to stop the murder of innocents.

---

Yet, you're doing very little to stop it.

quote:

---

I don’t think you can complain about a lack of compassion when you support the murdering of innocent children. Would you support the mass killing of the homeless and feeble out of “compassion” for their plight?

---

I don't think you can claim to have solutions when you compare a zygote to a homeless adult.

quote:

---

You sound like a Nazi.


Just like Margaret Sanger intended

---

Abortion is eugenic.

Nazis want to outnazi the Nazis and create a utopian society with fewer minorities.