- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:06 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Was there today, I think I saw two pro-choice signs all day. But I’m sure the media will focus on the counter-protest by pro-choice advocates
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:08 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
This is not a context in which most people engage in complex legal analysis. Again, however, I was simply addressing Fattie's very specific (and erroneous) contention about the non-existence of any definition inconsistent with his personal biases.
I understand that... my larger point was just to say that, in most contexts, every person has an inherent understanding that an unborn child is, in fact, a child.
quote:
You have never heard that argument from ME. I do not pretend that a fetus is not a genetically-distinct organism of the species Homo Sapiens sapiens. That is an argument based in biology.
I was not trying to refer to you with that... it is just extremely difficult for me to parse an argument of saying, "this is a biologically distinct human being" while simultaneously saying, "this human being has no right to live."
There is NO circumstance I'm aware of in any legal system throughout Western Civilization that allows and excuses a human being's life being ended through no fault of their own.
We have laws at all levels of government that criminalize bird eggs from being destroyed, the disruption of sea turtle egg laying cycles, and on and on... yet a potential child is not protected until birth, in many jurisdictions.
There is simply no way, biologically or religiously, that I can understand a rationale and justification for abortion.
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:10 pm to BengalOnTheBay
A fetus is not a fully formed human being. A woman is, and has rights to choose medically what happens to her body.
And I find it amazing that people have such compassion for something that isn't developed or born and zero compassion once it's popped out of that vagina
And I find it amazing that people have such compassion for something that isn't developed or born and zero compassion once it's popped out of that vagina
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:10 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Was there today, I think I saw two pro-choice signs all day. But I’m sure the media will focus on the counter-protest by pro-choice advocates
We saw about 5 pro-abortion zealots at the very beginning of the rally and about 2 or 3 dozen on the steps of the Supreme Court at the very end... but we were at the very front of the march so we probably saw some people who gave up by the middle/end of the march, considering I think it had to stretch out over a mile or so.
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:12 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
A fetus is not a fully formed human being.
Neither are babies with congenital heart defects or a myriad of other genetic issues, if we're talking about being "fully formed."
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:15 pm to BengalOnTheBay
Those are viable though
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:19 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Those are viable though
So are all the ones in the 3rd trimester. And many in the 2nd trimester.
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:22 pm to BengalOnTheBay
Don't abort in the third trimester
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:27 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:See "House MD", Season 3/Episode 17. "Fetal Position". You'll thank me...
A fetus isn't a child though. It's a fetus.

Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:47 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:And the “Generalization of the Day Award” goes to…
And I find it amazing that people have such compassion for something that isn't developed or born and zero compassion once it's popped out of that vagina
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:56 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
This is what makes libertarians look bad. This cocksucker.
Blast libertarians as you desire but Gnome is no libertarian. He is a boot-licking Statist of the first order.
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 1/20/23 at 7:59 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Boot lickin statist with the tshirt to prove it
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Expecting intellectual honesty from him is just a bridge too far.
Says the board’s CIA loving “libertarian.”
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:06 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Man you have a great running list of board libertarians
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:21 pm to BengalOnTheBay
quote:without being flippant, you really are comparing apples to bird eggs here. We do not protect those things because they have rights. We protect them, because they are extraordinarily rare, and we do not want their species to disappear from the Earth. By comparison, there are 7 billion humans, and there will be 8 billion in a few years, regardless of whether we abort a few pregnancies.
We have laws at all levels of government that criminalize bird eggs from being destroyed, the disruption of sea turtle egg laying cycles, and on and on
quote:I understand that, and I sympathize with it. The simple fact is that you have a completely different outlook on the matter, and your position is entirely consistent with your outlook. I suspect that is largely religion-based, and that you think the fetus/baby has some inherent value greater than other plants, or animals on this planet.
There is simply no way, biologically or religiously, that I can understand a rationale and justification for abortion.
I do not share that viewpoint. Humans are just another species of ape. There's nothing particularly special about us, other than sapience. Once the ability to think has emerged, there is something special. Prior to that, not so much. Whether we are talking about a fetus or an oak tree, absent an ability to think, I do not think that rights should vest. Absent legal rights in the fetus, there is absolutely no justification for interfering with the rights of the pregnant woman. Again, it is just a completely different outlook.
and now, at least one of your compatriots will engage in a series of personal attacks upon me, simply, because I view the world differently than they do. Stop a minute and compare that inevitable response to the way in which I responded to you.
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 8:34 pm
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:25 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:you are going to need to explain to me your rationale for believing that the rights of a sapient organism (the pregnant woman) should not govern over the theoretical rights of fetus that has less self-awareness than your coffee table.
Expecting intellectual honesty from him is just a bridge too far.quote:
Says the board’s CIA loving “libertarian.”
libertarians split on the issue, but about 2/3 of us believe that the nonaggression principle does not attach to non-sapient organisms. it is statism personified to argue that you (acting through the coercive power of the state), should be able to force her to do something with her body, but she does not wish to do.
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There's nothing particularly special about us, other than sapience.
So there is, quite literally, nothing special about you then.
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:27 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
libertarians split on the issue, but about 2/3 of us
This post was edited on 1/20/23 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 1/20/23 at 8:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Whether we are talking about a fetus or an oak tree

Popular
Back to top


1






