Started By
Message

re: 1.7 Million Ballot Images Destroyed in the Georgia 2020 Election

Posted on 6/27/26 at 12:03 am to
Posted by somethingdifferent
Member since Aug 2024
2352 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 12:03 am to
quote:

Cool twitter research lol
Obligatory genetic fallacy
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18438 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:36 am to
It sure was, can't wait to here your what you reasoning is for a Dem not winning in 2028, let me guess, republicans cheated, ya'll are so frickin predictable, just like some republicans
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11282 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:54 am to
quote:

I don't. Kavabaugh had accusations made against him. They were never credible, and they were ripped apart during his hearing.


Of course you don’t ….

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:58 am to
quote:

They were never credible,


Read better
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13224 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:12 am to
Eight pages in and still haven’t seen any sourcing material backing up anything from that ‘Tweet’ as far as data. Also the quotes are anonymous which we know MAGA doesn’t support or believe.

Twitter is the cesspool of the internet.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:24 am to
I think I figured out where this is coming from. That's probably a page from one of Lindell's expert reports from the case that was just dismissed. The dishonest content creators are calling it "COURT APPROVED" so people who don't know any better believe it is some undisputed set of facts. In reality, it's likely Lindell's data that's been debunked in countless other settings and what we don't see is the corresponding expert report doing just that.

But the dishonestly did its jobs. People read this and think the discussion is settled, these allegations are true, and they jump on the

That's how you get embarrassing performances like SouthEasternKaiju in this thread and your standard NPC stuff like this

quote:

Muh “clerical error.” NO PROOF!!! BIG LiE!!! BASELESS and FALSE!!!!”


quote:

Please, someone... explain to me how this nation can continue as intended by our founding fathers when cheating and fraud is permitted and not challenged???


quote:

Without some form of cheating they would never get in. They have nowhere near the voice that is projected.


quote:

We need to be decorating the lamp posts with these scumbags.


quote:

Totally secure - amirite?


The best part is the ven diagram of the posters who blindly support the most obvious dishonest content from X and the posters who blindly promote the dumbest conspiracy theories while creating a self-image of an independent, critical thinker who asks the right questions to poke holes in official narratives
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13224 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:27 am to
quote:

Because no way would Joe get 81 million votes , more than Obama and Kamala, transformative first time candidates of color.


Low iq argument. Did Obama have the benefit of mass mail in voting? Was Obama running against one of the most divisive and polarizing candidates of recent times? Obama received over 69 million votes in 2008 without mass mail in voting and running against a boring milquetoast candidate who didn’t seem very interested in winning. It pitiful that MAGA sycophants can’t understand this.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
13224 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:31 am to
quote:

But the dishonestly did its jobs. People read this and think the discussion is settled, these allegations are true


This is a weekly occurrence on here with posts from Twitter and links from The Gateway Pundit etc.

Someone sees an echo chamber headline they agree with don’t bother to even read the article or tweet and post it here and more often than not the ‘tweet’ already has a community note attached to it debunking it

Confirmation Bias is a very real thing on here. If MAGABarbiePatriot90210 posts it on Twitter it’s true by gawd!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:34 am to
The best part is that pointing out this obvious dishonesty/stupidity is spun, somehow, into "defending the left"

The implication of that argument has clearly not been examined by the NPCs, b/c it argues "the left" is the side of truth/facts and their in-group visage is an opponent to that...so an opponent to the truth.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49433 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:45 am to
MAGA sycophants

You project onto others what you are.
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
14140 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:05 am to
Kemp knew it was happening and was complicit in its coverup.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
40169 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:16 am to
There is a reason that States won’t allow the examination of their Voter Rolls in regard to lawful legitimacy. Or the Ballots that were harvested. Such would clear all this he-she said bs up.

The open Border when Dems hold power to open it, clearly defines their agenda. Talk is cheap when reality and consequences manifest. And “the emperor has no clothes “ ultimately rules the day.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83497 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:20 am to
Trump won 2020
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
41229 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:21 am to
We have everything.
Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
6202 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:22 am to
What’s the source of that doc?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:25 am to
quote:

What’s the source of that doc?


Ironically, you're not supposed to ask that question to the just asking questions crowd
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26924 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:26 am to
Here's a question for you Comrade Ronricks. You expect us to believe that Kamala Harris , who also ran against the same candidate Joe Biden did,and had all the advantages with her Joe did, could not duplicate his "81 Million" vote total?

Joe was taken off the ballot and replaced by her, she should have at least matched his totals. Using your logic she should have EXCEEDED his.

But she didnt. She got whooped, Because we were watching.She got over 75. Back in 2016 Hillary and people not named Trump got just short of 74.
This post was edited on 6/27/26 at 8:41 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481186 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:28 am to
quote:


Here's a question for you Comrade Ronricks. You expect us to believe that Kanala Harris , who also ran against the same candidate Joe Biden did,and had all the advantages with her Joe did, could not duplicate his "81 Million" vote total?

1. She came pretty close

2. She got more votes than Obama

3. You clearly don't know where she lost the votes.

The 2024 election isn't great for the muh steal argument, assuming you can analyze the data properly.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
129682 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:36 am to
Counter claim.

The ballot images don’t exist because the ballots didn’t exist.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151507 posts
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Can a lawyer opine on the destroyed images?
East Calcasieu Parishes Finest?
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram