- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1.7 Million Ballot Images Destroyed in the Georgia 2020 Election
Posted on 6/27/26 at 12:03 am to Patato Salad
Posted on 6/27/26 at 12:03 am to Patato Salad
quote:Obligatory genetic fallacy
Cool twitter research lol
Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:36 am to TBoy
It sure was, can't wait to here your what you reasoning is for a Dem not winning in 2028, let me guess, republicans cheated, ya'll are so frickin predictable, just like some republicans
Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't. Kavabaugh had accusations made against him. They were never credible, and they were ripped apart during his hearing.
Of course you don’t ….

Posted on 6/27/26 at 5:58 am to cadillacattack
quote:
They were never credible,
Read better
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Eight pages in and still haven’t seen any sourcing material backing up anything from that ‘Tweet’ as far as data. Also the quotes are anonymous which we know MAGA doesn’t support or believe.
Twitter is the cesspool of the internet.
Twitter is the cesspool of the internet.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:24 am to ronricks
I think I figured out where this is coming from. That's probably a page from one of Lindell's expert reports from the case that was just dismissed. The dishonest content creators are calling it "COURT APPROVED" so people who don't know any better believe it is some undisputed set of facts. In reality, it's likely Lindell's data that's been debunked in countless other settings and what we don't see is the corresponding expert report doing just that.
But the dishonestly did its jobs. People read this and think the discussion is settled, these allegations are true, and they jump on the
That's how you get embarrassing performances like SouthEasternKaiju in this thread and your standard NPC stuff like this
The best part is the ven diagram of the posters who blindly support the most obvious dishonest content from X and the posters who blindly promote the dumbest conspiracy theories while creating a self-image of an independent, critical thinker who asks the right questions to poke holes in official narratives
But the dishonestly did its jobs. People read this and think the discussion is settled, these allegations are true, and they jump on the
That's how you get embarrassing performances like SouthEasternKaiju in this thread and your standard NPC stuff like this
quote:
Muh “clerical error.” NO PROOF!!! BIG LiE!!! BASELESS and FALSE!!!!”
quote:
Please, someone... explain to me how this nation can continue as intended by our founding fathers when cheating and fraud is permitted and not challenged???
quote:
Without some form of cheating they would never get in. They have nowhere near the voice that is projected.
quote:
We need to be decorating the lamp posts with these scumbags.
quote:
Totally secure - amirite?
The best part is the ven diagram of the posters who blindly support the most obvious dishonest content from X and the posters who blindly promote the dumbest conspiracy theories while creating a self-image of an independent, critical thinker who asks the right questions to poke holes in official narratives
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:27 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Because no way would Joe get 81 million votes , more than Obama and Kamala, transformative first time candidates of color.
Low iq argument. Did Obama have the benefit of mass mail in voting? Was Obama running against one of the most divisive and polarizing candidates of recent times? Obama received over 69 million votes in 2008 without mass mail in voting and running against a boring milquetoast candidate who didn’t seem very interested in winning. It pitiful that MAGA sycophants can’t understand this.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But the dishonestly did its jobs. People read this and think the discussion is settled, these allegations are true
This is a weekly occurrence on here with posts from Twitter and links from The Gateway Pundit etc.
Someone sees an echo chamber headline they agree with don’t bother to even read the article or tweet and post it here and more often than not the ‘tweet’ already has a community note attached to it debunking it
Confirmation Bias is a very real thing on here. If MAGABarbiePatriot90210 posts it on Twitter it’s true by gawd!
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:34 am to ronricks
The best part is that pointing out this obvious dishonesty/stupidity is spun, somehow, into "defending the left"
The implication of that argument has clearly not been examined by the NPCs, b/c it argues "the left" is the side of truth/facts and their in-group visage is an opponent to that...so an opponent to the truth.
The implication of that argument has clearly not been examined by the NPCs, b/c it argues "the left" is the side of truth/facts and their in-group visage is an opponent to that...so an opponent to the truth.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 6:45 am to ronricks
MAGA sycophants
You project onto others what you are.
You project onto others what you are.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:05 am to cajunangelle
Kemp knew it was happening and was complicit in its coverup.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:16 am to Shamoan
There is a reason that States won’t allow the examination of their Voter Rolls in regard to lawful legitimacy. Or the Ballots that were harvested. Such would clear all this he-she said bs up.
The open Border when Dems hold power to open it, clearly defines their agenda. Talk is cheap when reality and consequences manifest. And “the emperor has no clothes “ ultimately rules the day.
The open Border when Dems hold power to open it, clearly defines their agenda. Talk is cheap when reality and consequences manifest. And “the emperor has no clothes “ ultimately rules the day.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:22 am to cajunangelle
What’s the source of that doc?
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:25 am to RedPants
quote:
What’s the source of that doc?
Ironically, you're not supposed to ask that question to the just asking questions crowd
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:26 am to ronricks
Here's a question for you Comrade Ronricks. You expect us to believe that Kamala Harris , who also ran against the same candidate Joe Biden did,and had all the advantages with her Joe did, could not duplicate his "81 Million" vote total?
Joe was taken off the ballot and replaced by her, she should have at least matched his totals. Using your logic she should have EXCEEDED his.
But she didnt. She got whooped, Because we were watching.She got over 75. Back in 2016 Hillary and people not named Trump got just short of 74.
Joe was taken off the ballot and replaced by her, she should have at least matched his totals. Using your logic she should have EXCEEDED his.
But she didnt. She got whooped, Because we were watching.She got over 75. Back in 2016 Hillary and people not named Trump got just short of 74.
This post was edited on 6/27/26 at 8:41 am
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:28 am to antibarner
quote:
Here's a question for you Comrade Ronricks. You expect us to believe that Kanala Harris , who also ran against the same candidate Joe Biden did,and had all the advantages with her Joe did, could not duplicate his "81 Million" vote total?
1. She came pretty close
2. She got more votes than Obama
3. You clearly don't know where she lost the votes.
The 2024 election isn't great for the muh steal argument, assuming you can analyze the data properly.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:36 am to cajunangelle
Counter claim.
The ballot images don’t exist because the ballots didn’t exist.
The ballot images don’t exist because the ballots didn’t exist.
Posted on 6/27/26 at 8:42 am to cajunangelle
quote:East Calcasieu Parishes Finest?
Can a lawyer opine on the destroyed images?
Popular
Back to top


0










