- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1.7 Million Ballot Images Destroyed in the Georgia 2020 Election
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
You're pivoting away from the fact that 2020 was stolen and ballot images destroyed.
Everyone knows why.
1
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:48 pm to cajunangelle
Sorry. GOP Senate still refuses to pass the SAVE Act.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:49 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You're pivoting away from the fact that 2020 was stolen
Holy shite
You're trying to describe me keeping the topic on topic as a pivot (when it's only a "pivot" from your attempted pivot).
quote:
and ballot images destroyed.
I haven't pivoted away from this. We can try to see if you'll answer (for the third time)
What direct relationship do voting numbers in various counties have in proving claims that 1.7M ballots in GA were destroyed?
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:51 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
Signed, the team that still believes the Russian Collusion hoax of 2016.
Why don’t yall accept the statements of the Republican Secretary of State of Georgia who oversaw the election? He says the election was fair and accurate and that Trump lost Georgia.
The answer is that Trump tried to get the Republican Secretary of State who oversaw the election to actually cheat, and he refused. So this is typical Trump cult attacks on anyone who says “No” to Trump.
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:58 pm to TBoy
Watching so many of yall debase yourselves by displaying your groveling subservience to Trump is more than a little embarrassing. Snap out of it.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:06 pm to cajunangelle
Muh “clerical error.” NO PROOF!!! BIG LiE!!! BASELESS and FALSE!!!!”
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This is what SFP is reduced to. Just saying it's clear fraud but it's still not fraud. That's what happened in the Tulsi thread.
Words with no meaning
quote:
direct-credible evidence
It was only a matter of time before you got backed into a corner on these issues. Every reasonable person could see this coming a mile away.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:07 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
cajunangelle
I somehow think...while evidence was destroyed (the destruction is obstruction--- is a part of the evidence)
quote:
When Sarbanes-Oxley was written, Section 1512(c) was designed to stop people from destroying financial evidence. It has two parts:
Subsection (c)(1) outlaws corruptly altering, destroying, or concealing documents to hinder an official proceeding.
Subsection (c)(2) acts as a catchall, making it a felony to "otherwise obstruct, influence, or impede any official proceeding."
Because the joint session of Congress meeting to certify the electoral vote counts as an "official proceeding," the Department of Justice applied this "otherwise obstructs" provision to roughly 25% of all January 6th cases. It carried a heavy maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison.
The Supreme Court Challenge
The use of this corporate governance law against physical rioters was highly controversial and ultimately escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2024 landmark case Fischer v. United States.
In a 6–3 ruling issued on June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court significantly limited how prosecutors could use the Sarbanes-Oxley charge. The Court ruled that:
Subsection (c)(2) cannot be used as a broad dragnet for any disruptive behavior.
To sustain this charge, the government must prove that a defendant specifically impaired or tried to impair the integrity or availability of physical evidence (like documents, records, or witness files) used in the proceeding.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Genius, this has been reported on for years now and you know that. You're just out of bullets because now you can't claim MUH CT!!!
For the record, NO source was provided in OP
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:10 pm to TBoy
quote:
That election was six years ago. Move on, losers
When you DNC commie f@gs stop crying about the J6 muh “insurrection” that your side staged as cover and a distraction from the blatantly rigged election. Then maybe we’ll quit talking about it,
You worthless bitch.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You realize this means nothing, right?
You went on and on about how "the courts say" and now you're finally repeating what I told you before - all court decisions are not unanimous meaning even some of the judges disagree with you quote:Freaking hypocrite
This is your standard dishonest attempt to create an argument from authority
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:13 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Just saying it's clear fraud
I never said this
Only IF they can produce credible direct evidence to prove the claims of fraud will it be "clear fraud"
And I say that's a possibility but I'm still waiting on that evidence to judge.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:REFRAME!!
You may be trying to pivot there
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:16 pm to ronricks
quote:
Something being posted to Twitter is not a source. bullshite gets linked from Twitter on here all the time
Yeah… it’s not legit until the real journalists at MSNBC, CNN, and CBS report it, right? They would never lie or ignore legitimate news stories or anything,
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Well this is not true
"Court approval" doesn't validate it
quote:I accept this as an apology for you swearing up and down "MUH SCOTUS RULED......"
affect credibility
quote:Only in your stupid brain
The "court approval" language is an attempt to dishonestly create authority
quote:What is wrong with you. You know fully well that some people are actually experts
This is the same thing when they do the CIA EXPERT SAYS or similar arguments from authority
quote:YES!!! We got a "CT" in here. We haven't gottten "MUH REFRAME" yet. But there's still time. I want us to hit all the obligatory SFP-isms in the same thread.
This is a common meme with CT "rhetoric"
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:17 pm to cajunangelle
Millions, I tell you! I seent it on tweeter!!!
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:17 pm to cajunangelle
Please, someone... explain to me how this nation can continue as intended by our founding fathers when cheating and fraud is permitted and not challenged???
Maybe folks disagree on Trump bad or not, but we're headed, it wont matter.
Folks with TDS will be wishing Trump was still around once this shite plays out
Maybe folks disagree on Trump bad or not, but we're headed, it wont matter.
Folks with TDS will be wishing Trump was still around once this shite plays out
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yeah except they are valid. They've been valid for years. Just like the Tulsi revelations, these are merely official stamps on things rational people have known
Just because a court permits a report or expert report to be noted as much doesn't speak to the credibility or viability of the allegations/opinions contained within the testimony and/or report
quote:Juries don't decide truth. Statements like this affirm to me that you're not a lawyer
Otherwise it's for the jury to do
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What direct relationship do voting numbers in various counties have in proving claims that 1.7M ballots in GA were destroyed?
I think you're having a seizure One of the claims is that there were more votes than voters. That's how
Posted on 6/26/26 at 6:22 pm to TBoy
quote:Prove he's telling the truth because the evidence says otherwise
Why don’t yall accept the statements of the Republican Secretary of State of Georgia who oversaw the election?
quote:What was the substantiation for that statement?
He says the election was fair and accurate and that Trump lost Georgia
quote:Utter lie. That's all you have. Pathetic
The answer is that Trump tried to get the Republican Secretary of State who oversaw the election to actually cheat
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News