- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1.7 Million Ballot Images Destroyed in the Georgia 2020 Election
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:09 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:09 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
"No evidence would allow you to admit 2020 was stolen, so it's a disingenuous discussion."
Without some form of cheating they would never get in. They have nowhere near the voice that is projected.
Without some form of cheating they would never get in. They have nowhere near the voice that is projected.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Dew yew reckon?
I reckon they're just describing the anti-Dominion forensic expert's report.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We don't have any direct-credible evidence establishing they were destroyed.
Can they be produced?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Care to finally answer this question about the SPLC?
quote:
You say plenty of things. Can you name something other than the bank fraud?
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
Nope, I nailed it and you just can't cope.
Keep upping your post count.
Keep upping your post count.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Dew yew reckon?
Yes. Court's don't decide if one report is somehow valid or the report for the trial, etc. Just because a court permits a report or expert report to be noted as much doesn't speak to the credibility or viability of the allegations/opinions contained within the testimony and/or report.
The only way a court would make a determination is if there was a bench trial and the court acted as the finder of fact. Otherwise it's for the jury to do.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:14 pm to moneyg
quote:
Can they be produced?
I don't think we know the answer to that question, which is why the dishonest content creators rush to the gap until the actual facts are made public.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:16 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Nope, I nailed it
You never explained this:
What direct relationship do voting numbers in various counties have in proving claims that 1.7M ballots in GA were destroyed?
You ran from it last time and tried to change the discussion to something completely unrelated to what was being discussed.
Feel free to try again.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think we know the answer to that question, which is why the dishonest content creators rush to the gap until the actual facts are made public.
IF, Georgia can't produce the ballot images, what are the fair implications?
I realize you don't accept this as fact at the moment.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:18 pm to cajunangelle
We need to be decorating the lamp posts with these scumbags.
You know, with ribbons and paint and rainbows in minecraft.
You know, with ribbons and paint and rainbows in minecraft.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
I never assigned the one with the other. Only that 2020 was stolen, destroying evidence is an admission of guilt to that fact, and statistically it's impossible that Biden won.
Because no way would Joe get 81 million votes , more than Obama and Kamala, transformative first time candidates of color.
The cheaters didn't WANT to get caught, so they destroyed the evidence. They're not going to admit cheating, you dullard.
Because no way would Joe get 81 million votes , more than Obama and Kamala, transformative first time candidates of color.
The cheaters didn't WANT to get caught, so they destroyed the evidence. They're not going to admit cheating, you dullard.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:20 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:I can build some pretty sweet gallows in minecraft. Just sayin'
You know, with ribbons and paint and rainbows in minecraft.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:27 pm to LSUtoBOOT
quote:
JFK is rolling over in his grave to hide his face in shame of the modern democrat party.
Yes. The modern party is championed by adult loser humans like Tboy, who don’t have jobs, have never ever been a part of society in any meaningful way, who were accustomed to a life of insignificance and lurking in the shadows.
However, now, this undesirable loser has had a taste of sunlight and doesn’t care who he has to hitch his wagon to sustain it, he will do anything to stay relevant. The useful idiots
You’re going back in that cave, tboy, one way or another, you fagot arse bitch ;)
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:28 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
I never assigned the one with the other.
Then what was the "direct" association with the picture you posted?
Why post something irrelevant to the conversation?
quote:
, destroying evidence is an admission of guilt to that fact
There has been no direct, credible evidence establishing any evidence was destroyed. Now you're refuting your own post
quote:
I never assigned the one with the other.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:31 pm to cajunangelle
Ok, when will the arrests happen?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:39 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.
Weird, you replied to a post of mine with these arguments of mine:
quote:
Words with no meaning without direct-credible evidence to substantiate them.
That referenced the headline (Which specifically discusses 1.7M ballots being destroyed)
quote:
We don't have any direct-credible evidence establishing they were destroyed.
quote:
You mean making the claims without any direct-credible evidence upon which to make them? Yes, this x post plays well into that meme.
So now you're saying when you said
quote:
direct credible evidence
You were THEN pivoting to this irrelevance?
quote:
Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.
You realize how incredibly non-sensical your "arguments" are, right?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:39 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Nothing cries out that everything was on the up and up like evidence being destroyed.
Only 1.7 million ballot images in a race that was decided by 12,000 "votes."
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:41 pm to Auburn1968
quote:quote:
Nothing cries out that everything was on the up and up like evidence being destroyed.
Only 1.7 million ballot images in a race that was decided by 12,000 "votes."
And we see the fruit of the dishonesty
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:44 pm to TBoy
quote:
That election was six years ago. Move on, losers
-Signed, the team that still believes the Russian Collusion hoax of 2016.
Back to top


0








