Started By
Message

re: 1.7 Million Ballot Images Destroyed in the Georgia 2020 Election

Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by FrontlineTiger
Member since Aug 2024
996 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:09 pm to
"No evidence would allow you to admit 2020 was stolen, so it's a disingenuous discussion."

Without some form of cheating they would never get in. They have nowhere near the voice that is projected.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
139914 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

I reckon they're just describing the anti-Dominion forensic expert's report.
Dew yew reckon?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63375 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

We don't have any direct-credible evidence establishing they were destroyed.



Can they be produced?
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5109 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:10 pm to
Care to finally answer this question about the SPLC?

quote:

You say plenty of things. Can you name something other than the bank fraud?
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 5:11 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
48192 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:11 pm to
Nope, I nailed it and you just can't cope.

Keep upping your post count.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Dew yew reckon?

Yes. Court's don't decide if one report is somehow valid or the report for the trial, etc. Just because a court permits a report or expert report to be noted as much doesn't speak to the credibility or viability of the allegations/opinions contained within the testimony and/or report.

The only way a court would make a determination is if there was a bench trial and the court acted as the finder of fact. Otherwise it's for the jury to do.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Can they be produced?


I don't think we know the answer to that question, which is why the dishonest content creators rush to the gap until the actual facts are made public.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Nope, I nailed it


You never explained this:

What direct relationship do voting numbers in various counties have in proving claims that 1.7M ballots in GA were destroyed?

You ran from it last time and tried to change the discussion to something completely unrelated to what was being discussed.

Feel free to try again.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63375 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

I don't think we know the answer to that question, which is why the dishonest content creators rush to the gap until the actual facts are made public.


IF, Georgia can't produce the ballot images, what are the fair implications?

I realize you don't accept this as fact at the moment.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
7264 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:18 pm to
We need to be decorating the lamp posts with these scumbags.
You know, with ribbons and paint and rainbows in minecraft.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
48192 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:19 pm to
I never assigned the one with the other. Only that 2020 was stolen, destroying evidence is an admission of guilt to that fact, and statistically it's impossible that Biden won.

Because no way would Joe get 81 million votes , more than Obama and Kamala, transformative first time candidates of color.

The cheaters didn't WANT to get caught, so they destroyed the evidence. They're not going to admit cheating, you dullard.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
14115 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

You know, with ribbons and paint and rainbows in minecraft.
I can build some pretty sweet gallows in minecraft. Just sayin'
Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
3081 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

JFK is rolling over in his grave to hide his face in shame of the modern democrat party.


Yes. The modern party is championed by adult loser humans like Tboy, who don’t have jobs, have never ever been a part of society in any meaningful way, who were accustomed to a life of insignificance and lurking in the shadows.

However, now, this undesirable loser has had a taste of sunlight and doesn’t care who he has to hitch his wagon to sustain it, he will do anything to stay relevant. The useful idiots

You’re going back in that cave, tboy, one way or another, you fagot arse bitch ;)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

I never assigned the one with the other.




Then what was the "direct" association with the picture you posted?

Why post something irrelevant to the conversation?

quote:

, destroying evidence is an admission of guilt to that fact

There has been no direct, credible evidence establishing any evidence was destroyed. Now you're refuting your own post

quote:

I never assigned the one with the other.


Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
48192 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:30 pm to
Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53917 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:31 pm to
Ok, when will the arrests happen?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.


Weird, you replied to a post of mine with these arguments of mine:

quote:

Words with no meaning without direct-credible evidence to substantiate them.


That referenced the headline (Which specifically discusses 1.7M ballots being destroyed)

quote:

We don't have any direct-credible evidence establishing they were destroyed.


quote:

You mean making the claims without any direct-credible evidence upon which to make them? Yes, this x post plays well into that meme.


So now you're saying when you said

quote:

direct credible evidence


You were THEN pivoting to this irrelevance?

quote:


Proof of cheating, count face, not the 1.7 ballots destroyed.


You realize how incredibly non-sensical your "arguments" are, right?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26976 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Nothing cries out that everything was on the up and up like evidence being destroyed.


Only 1.7 million ballot images in a race that was decided by 12,000 "votes."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479466 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

quote:

Nothing cries out that everything was on the up and up like evidence being destroyed.


Only 1.7 million ballot images in a race that was decided by 12,000 "votes."


And we see the fruit of the dishonesty
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38575 posts
Posted on 6/26/26 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

That election was six years ago. Move on, losers

-Signed, the team that still believes the Russian Collusion hoax of 2016.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram