Started By
Message
locked post

11th Circuit Writ Accepted To Hear Case To Invalidate Fraudulent 2020, 2022 Elections

Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:17 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39021 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:17 pm
11th Circuit Emergency Writ Accepted To Hear Case To Invalidate Fraudulent 2020, 2022 Elections - Justice Clarence Thomas To Rule

quote:

An 'Application' to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was accepted as a Writ of Mandamus through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

This Writ of Mandamus (Application) is something Justice Thomas can rule on independently, or he can forward it to the whole of the Supreme Court.

The applicant is asking that Florida's 2022 General Election (with a 2020 option) be set aside and held anew. There is also room for the 2020 election cycle to be set aside as well, since the evidence shows the same uncertified and uncertifiable equipment was used in both election cycles.

The same evidence proves that the whole of the elections throughout the country were vulnerable to the same fraud, which allows Justice Thomas, or the whole of the Supreme Court, to set aside the results of the entire country for both the 2020 and the 2022 election cycles


Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:17 pm to
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 9:18 pm
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:18 pm to
I'm listening.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:18 pm to
Interdasting...
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10774 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:20 pm to
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:21 pm to
Florida? Were there shenanigans in FL?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85602 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:22 pm to
Ginni Thomas has already flicked her bean off her body

But the source docs won’t pull up for me. Got a better link?
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 9:24 pm
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
6706 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:24 pm to
No judge had the balls to do anything about the election in 2020 and no judge will have the balls to touch it now CT included. I wouldn’t get to excited about this.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18741 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:26 pm to
I feel like the illegal rules changes for mail in voting unilaterally changed by state administrations which bypasses state legislatures as prescribed in the constitution is more of a slam dunk.

But somehow that never got traction.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23007 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:34 pm to
Christine Scott, the plaintiff in this case is a bit crazy. LINK

Her entire complaint is that she should’ve been allowed to collect signatures to be on the ballot on private property and didn’t have to leave when asked. LINK
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 9:36 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85602 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:39 pm to
That’s cajunangelle. Please remove her real name.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:43 pm to
Discovery is gonna be a bitch!
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42268 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:47 pm to
They will punt. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150320 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:48 pm to
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15271 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 9:54 pm to
Y’all are some gullible SOBs.


ITS. NOT. HAPPENING.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2393 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 10:00 pm to
I clicked on the links to see the actual filings. It is quite an impressive amount of total jibberish.

982 pages worth.

There are some pages where coherent paragraphs are written, but the statements are bizarre.

I wouldn't put much hope in this one.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18026 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Christine Scott, the plaintiff in this case is a bit crazy.

Was that written in a composition notebook?
Posted by 10thyrsr
Texas
Member since Oct 2020
1140 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 10:02 pm to
The question that is important is whether or not a parking lot open to the general public is private property.

If you own private property you have to post "no-trespassing" signs to keep people out.

If you don't then that opens you up to many lawsuits. This will be interesting to follow
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85602 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Was that written in a composition notebook?


That’s an originalist position. Obviously Thomas Jefferson didn’t bust slave pussy over a Microsoft Word doc. He wrote on parchment.
This post was edited on 10/24/23 at 10:06 pm
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31667 posts
Posted on 10/24/23 at 10:39 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram