Started By
Message

re: What state imposed deer limit would you find acceptable?

Posted on 11/20/19 at 12:50 pm to
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11877 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Louisiana is such a diverse state, not only with a rut varying from September to February, but the deer population is just as extreme.
Some areas see a few deer per year.
Some areas see a few deer per sitting.
It's hard to have a one size fits all approach.
quote:

We eat a lot of deer at our house and we've never gone through more than about 4 in a year.
I try like hell to cook it as much as I can, but we only get through 1-2 per year.
So, it's a cycle, 2 this year, 1 next, and so on.
Maybe some larger families can go through more... or you can give some away to friends/family.
quote:

Let the state manage the population, let landowners manage for age.
I generally like this approach.
Posted by MobileJosh
On the go
Member since May 2018
1065 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 1:00 pm to
increase the quality of the deer. Or that "you don't need 6 deer, so why should we be able to shoot 6?" [/quote]

That’s a pretty 80’s way to think.

Shoot a shite load of does.
Shoot old bucks.
Get your ratio right.
????????????
Profit
Posted by Buster180
Member since Jun 2017
1455 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I try like hell to cook it as much as I can, but we only get through 1-2 per year.


I simply do not understand this. How many times a week are you eating it? Do you make any into sausage, brats, etc?
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 1:07 pm
Posted by Boat Motor Bandit
Member since Jun 2016
1891 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 2:11 pm to
I like to see a state wide 3 deer (1 buck, 1 doe, 1 either sex) limit for 2 years. The First buck must be 4 on one side and 13" wide. If your either sex tag is filled with a buck it must be trophy class. Those restrictions are 10pt on and 16" wide. After 2 years go to a final 4 deer state wide 2 buck 2 doe with antler restrictions of 4 on one side and 13" wide forever.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64156 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 2:20 pm to
2 antlered / 2 antlerless / 1 either

4 points on one side requirement for the antlered.
Posted by tigerO
Member since Mar 2006
1348 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 2:23 pm to
Leave the numbers alone and just put a point restriction on bucks.
2 bucks...3 does..1 either sex

Bucks must be 3 point on one side
Posted by RoIITide
Member since Dec 2010
852 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

2 buck / 1 doe limit


I’d prefer 1 buck / 1 doe.

You are talking about daily, right?
Posted by Buster180
Member since Jun 2017
1455 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Those restrictions are 10pt on and 16" wide.


So a 5.5 year old 9 point would be off limits for your 2nd buck?
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
3708 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 6:06 pm to
There are problems with any antler restrictions.Point and width restrictions lead to high-grading.An outstanding yearling or 2 1/2 year old with 8 points and 13 in. spread is legal while a 5 1/2 year old 4 pt with 12 in. spread is left to breed.I killed a 2 1/2 year old buck with 9 points and 16 in.spread few years ago,no doubt he would been outstanding deer with another 2-3 years.
The best way is to age a buck by his body structure but where I hunt bucks don’t stand around in open,turning this way and that so I can figure out how old he is like they do on hunting shows.In Louisiana it’s usually thick with shooting lanes and high lines,I typically have about 10 seconds to get my crosshairs on a buck and shoot before they get across.
With the drop in sale of hunting licenses,I don’t know that making it harder to kill a buck is the best way to go.It’s hard to get kids interested in hunting these days with video games distracting them.If a kid is interested,are they going to stay interested if they see a buck and can’t shoot because it doesn’t have enough points or wide enough.
Another issue,the states with the most restrictions and high populations also have the highest number of automobiles hitting deer.That doesn’t seem the best use of the resource,not to mention the people injured and killed.
Posted by Raz4back
Member since Mar 2011
3950 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 6:13 pm to
No APR, One buck archery, one buck firearm (can take your second buck with archery equipment during open firearm season) 2 doe with archery, 2 doe with firearm. Move gun season out of the rut.
This post was edited on 11/20/19 at 6:15 pm
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
13171 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Move gun season out of the rut.



Yeaaaaaaaaaa, NO.
Posted by Raz4back
Member since Mar 2011
3950 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Yeaaaaaaaaaa, NO.


That would be the most effective way to increase the age structure of bucks.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
14035 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Your land but they’re not your deer
Hey, you idealists can dream up all the rules and shite y’all want just leave me out of it.
Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2130 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:17 pm to
If you do that, we will have to allow night-time hunting to kill one.
Posted by Ron Cheramie
The Cajun Hedgehog
Member since Aug 2016
5152 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:33 pm to
I don’t think there should be any differences in number of deer taken in each Area. What needs to be done is restrict number of deer residents from each Area can shoot For instance, hunters with addresses in area code 985, 504, 337, or 225 should only be able to kill 2 deer per year no matter which area they hunt. Hunters with 318 area code remain at 6 deer per year

No reason 318 hunters should suffer because our southern brethren have shot out all their deer
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
13171 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:36 pm to
318 hunters can eat shite
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12731 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

For instance, hunters with addresses in area code 985, 504, 337, or 225 should only be able to kill 2 deer per year no matter which area they hunt. Hunters with 318 area code remain at 6 deer per year

Lmao! This has to be an all-time troll attempt for the OB.
Posted by Ron Cheramie
The Cajun Hedgehog
Member since Aug 2016
5152 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:40 pm to
Stay down there then. The annual convoy is coming next weekend. I-49 will be littered with corn sacks and natural light boxes
Posted by upgrade
Member since Jul 2011
13171 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24965 posts
Posted on 11/21/19 at 12:46 pm to
I don’t like a point restriction. In south MS it’s 10” inside or 13” main beam with youth being able to shoot any antlered deer. This seems very fair to me. I would like to see the creel limit reduces as we can currently shoot 3 bucks two does per license with NO tags.... he’ll even if they left it alone and put a tag/check in system in place it would be an improvement. I just don’t feel the population is there in our area to allow 5 deer per hunter. I also suspect that the MS honor system gets heavily abused
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram