- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff of the Troy Landry Thread- When is trespassing ok?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:09 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:Meh. This thread is about canals. I think neither of us know the full extent of Florida law, but it's not what you guys have been pretending all along.
You realize what you quoted shows floridas laws are different than ours correct, and that navigable waterway is public unless in very rare casese
quote:I know zero about it.
Texasis simple like ours, just on the opposite end of ours
0
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:10 pm to lsupride87
quote:Why?
If e-fighting was real, I would chose to e-fight you
quote:You're even dumber than I originally thought.
Between this, and your "its a 6 point posts" I want to check the knucles
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:11 pm to AlxTgr
While I don't fully understand the laws on how water can be private if you can access it from public waterways, I think that if someone digs a canal off of a river to access their property or to have a launch that is easier for them to access the river or do whatever they do on their property, it is basically like a driveway for water and I don't see how someone else should have the right to anchor a boat in it and fish whether it be for liability purposes or the fact that they spent the money to build the canal. To me its like parking in someones driveway and saying you can use it because its off of a public road. So the way I look at it is its the same if you put a gate across your driveway because you don't want people using it.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:12 pm to redneck
about the only thing we might be able to agree on is the laws of Louisiana concerning waterways and property ownership (compared to all other states) are screwed up bigtime, so, pull together politically and get the laws changed, good luck with that...
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:12 pm to Cowboyfan89
quote:Your post. Here it is again
Wtf are you talking about?
quote:
Now we are getting ridiculous. If it's a natural waterbody that can be legally accessed, how the shite is it not public?
You are concluding it can be legally accessed before determining if it public or private.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:13 pm to AlxTgr
Do you really think I'm dumb? That hurts my feelings
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:14 pm to Melvin Spellvin
quote:Nope
the only thing we might be able to agree on is the laws of Louisiana concerning waterways and property ownership (compared to all other states) are screwed up bigtime
quote:Do you realize what would happen?
so, pull together politically and get the laws changed
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:16 pm to lsupride87
quote:You author dumb posts. We all do it at one time or another. It's not personal. If my best friend posted that, I'd call him dumb too. Lord knows I call him dumb all the time in other contexts
Do you really think I'm dumb?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:16 pm to Melvin Spellvin
quote:unfortunately, it seems most here are like the LA laws
about the only thing we might be able to agree on is the laws of Louisiana concerning waterways and property ownership (compared to all other states) are screwed up bigtime, so, pull together politically and get the laws changed, good luck with that...
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:17 pm to AlxTgr
And I bet your best friend has knuckle checked you before for calling him dumb eh?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:18 pm to lsupride87
Really can't wait for the Crooks opinion from the third circus. Oral argument was done recently. Shouldn't be too long for an opinion. The trial court appeared to give the landowner's their cake and allow them to eat it too. All the while making it unclear to many who currently owns the shite
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:20 pm to AlxTgr
I'm not concluding anything. I'm merely restating what the article said in the form of a question. I'm assuming by "legal access", they mean that it has some sort of boat launch off a public road. If that is the case, how is it not public? Any other means of access (crossing private land, using private launch, launching from public roadside) would not necessarily constitute "legal access".
Otherwise, what is being considered "legal access"? Public frontage alone wouldn't make it public, but you typically don't see a public launch on a private waterbody.
Otherwise, what is being considered "legal access"? Public frontage alone wouldn't make it public, but you typically don't see a public launch on a private waterbody.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:22 pm to redneck
quote:Truth.
trespassing is not allowed when hunting
quote:More truth, in fact I don't even consider it trespassing if you are floating in a boat in tidal water.
but is perfectly fine when fishing
Bank fishermen are trespassing if they are on the wrong private property.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:25 pm to AlxTgr
quote:Maybe I am dumb because I have no clue what you are talking about
Really can't wait for the Crooks opinion from the third circus. Oral argument was done recently. Shouldn't be too long for an opinion. The trial court appeared to give the landowner's their cake and allow them to eat it too. All the while making it unclear to many who currently owns the shite
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:26 pm to lsupride87
quote:He laughs.
And I bet your best friend has knuckle checked you before for calling him dumb eh?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Maybe I am dumb because I have no clue what you are talking about
Could be wrong, but I would think he's talking about the Catahoula Lake matter.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:31 pm to lsupride87
The decision about Catahoula Lake. The NOLA site is terrible, but here is an article. Ignore the headline and opinion. Focus on the facts.
More stable site
More stable site
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:40 pm to AlxTgr
So, the argument is that the area flooded to create the lake was never lawfully acquired by the state?
Seems cut and dry to me. State should quit flooding it.
Seems cut and dry to me. State should quit flooding it.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:44 pm to Cowboyfan89
quote:The river vs lake debate. The lines are different based upon the outcome. The judge said,
So, the argument is that the area flooded to create the lake was never lawfully acquired by the state?
Seems cut and dry to me. State should quit flooding it.
quote:So, if it is determined to be expropriated, and the owners were compensated, then it's now state land.
the state had unlawfully expropriated the river banks, owing the landowners $38 million in damages as well as $4.5 million in unpaid oil and gas royalties, after oil drilling has been taking place in the area throughout the years.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:46 pm to AlxTgr
Interesting when someone brings facts to the table. Well done, Sir. 
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News