- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reusable Magazines?
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:05 pm
14
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:07 pm to Markmont03
quote:
Asked how a ban on magazines holding more than 15 rounds would be effective in reducing gun violence, DeGette said:
“I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:08 pm to wickowick
Wow
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:09 pm to wickowick
OMG
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:10 pm to Markmont03
Oh
My
God
These people wanna make laws regulating us, but they're too damn stupid to even know what they're regulating.
My
God
These people wanna make laws regulating us, but they're too damn stupid to even know what they're regulating.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:10 pm to Nodust
She went ahead and opened her mouth and removed all doubt didn't she
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:11 pm to Markmont03
I hate stupid, ignorant people. Especially ones that backtrack on dumb crap they say by making it seem like their words were twisted around or misunderstood. The problem is DC is full of these exact people that can't take any responsibility for any of the stupid crap they say. Idiots.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:21 pm to wickowick
quote:
Asked how a ban on magazines holding more than 15 rounds would be effective in reducing gun violence, DeGette said:
“I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”
That's impressive. At least she didn't mention the Economist's Year in Review.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:21 pm to carhartt
Hole E Chit... what's the address I can send the stupid letter too
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:22 pm to Markmont03
No way that's real..right? I mean there's no way a person is that dumb is there?
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:26 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
No way that's real..right? I mean there's no way a person is that dumb is there?
Video Here
The left sets that bar very low...
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:27 pm to wickowick
I wish I could say I was surprised or shocked...but I kind of expected her not to know a damn thing about firearms...
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:27 pm to xenon16
quote:
what's the address I can send the stupid letter too
Sorry, ignorant public servant piss me off. What can I say.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:00 pm to Markmont03
Its ok because Feinstein is an expert and will educate them so they can pass common sense laws.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 4:05 pm to Markmont03
My jaw hit the desk when I read that
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:09 pm to Markmont03
quote:
Asked how a ban on magazines holding more than 15 rounds would be effective in reducing gun violence, DeGette said:
“I will tell you these are ammunition, they’re bullets, so the people who have those now they’re going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won’t be any more available.”
My work computer's not pulling up the actual link. Having read the above quote, I agree w/ y'all that like a lot of liberals, she's completely uneducated and ignorant regarding guns, ammo and magazines. OTOH, what if her seemingly "stupid" comment was just a "Freudian slip?" Isn't it possible her comment indicates an unspoken agenda of some on the left to also ban, or at least severely curtail the availability of, ammo. Maybe she thinks that once the ammo in a currently loaded magazine has shot, it won't be able to be reloaded becuase the ammo will have been banned by then? Sounds crazy to us, but we all know there are those on the left who would like to get read of guns by any means possible. If you can't get read of the guns, just get rid of the ammo.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:12 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
I think you're giving them too much credit.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:13 pm to DrTyger
quote:I bet that dumb bItch doesn't know who goes first if 3 people stop simultaneously at a 4 way stop sign.
These people wanna make laws regulating us, but they're too damn stupid to even know what they're regulating.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 5:22 pm to Geauxtiga
quote:
I bet that dumb bItch doesn't know who goes first if 3 people stop simultaneously at a 4 way stop sign
The only correct answer is me.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News