- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official AR-15 thread
Posted on 7/5/16 at 10:33 pm to ChatRabbit77
Posted on 7/5/16 at 10:33 pm to ChatRabbit77
I've got one. Real nice.
Posted on 7/5/16 at 11:06 pm to DeoreDX
quote:
I'm building the stainless upper for paper punching. Putting the Vortex Crossfire II 4-12x44 on it. The other upper with the Phosphate barrel and Bushnell 1-4x24 will be kept the same. Might turn into a new lower later in the year. Honestly I don't shoot 223 enough to ever shoot out a stainless barrel in my life time.
See that's even more confusing. If you're trying to do a super accurate paper punching build why would you cheap out on the barrel...the most important part. As for shooting out a stainless bbl chambered in .223/5.56...3k-5k rounds goes fast shooting 30 at a time.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 12:25 am to Propagandalf
I went with a 8.5" Noveske Stainless for my 300blk. Lots of reports of people getting 12000-15000rds out of them. In an old interview I read, John Noveske said that the proprietary button he uses helps with a more gradual degradation of accuracy so that the groups expand rather than just immediately sending projectiles tumbling. I think he said that his typical stainless group was .5-.6MOA whereas his chrome lined barrels were "sub-MOA". I'm going to get a chrome lined next and compare.
I found the interview and he mentions a run of "extreme duty" barrels that they did out of 17-4 with a RH of 38
he said they sold for $1000 and just tore through tooling so they put it on hold
RIP John
I found the interview and he mentions a run of "extreme duty" barrels that they did out of 17-4 with a RH of 38
RIP John
This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 12:32 am
Posted on 7/6/16 at 12:50 am to Carson123987
quote:
RIP John
Knights Armament just released this interview 4 days ago with John. Pretty darn good. LINK
Posted on 7/6/16 at 1:08 am to Carson123987
I have seen the interview and I believe it was one from 2005 that was later referenced years later when he was talking to the same guy and mentioned more about his barrels and included that bit about the $1000 barrel. It mentioned a stainless barrel of theirs that was seen at a carbine CQB class 3 separate times in like 6 months and observed by the instructor to not have lost any noticeable accuracy over the 10,000 rounds fire through the classes. I don't exactly recall the details, but that's it in a nutshell.
This could happen because at a CQB class you are likely engaging targets at <100yds. A shot out barrel is one that has had it's throat eroded away such that it can no longer hold the bullet so that is enters the rifling at the correct angle. It is well known in the benchrest community that a barrel can be "shot out" and no longer capable of holding 1 MOA at 600, but still be serviceable and hold MOA at let's say 200. This is because as the barrel's throat erodes it gets to the point where the jacket of the bullet is getting fouled as it enters the rifling. This causes the gases to not evenly surround the bullet as well as well as effect the predicable aerodynamics of the bullet in flight. This can create a barrel that is MOA at 100 yards, but 2 MOA at 600yds. So, if you are doing CQB classes at 100yd an in it could take until the barrel starts sending bullets end over end to realize it is shot out.
If you start with a cheap stainless barrel that has a throat machined with too much tolerance (tolerance is tighest in the throat) due to poor quality control in producing cheap barrels, your barrel could be "shot out" so to speak before you fire a round through it. That's why I questioned the guy on his barrel choice. It didn't make sense to me as a regular AR 'gunning', ride hard, etc. barrel and it didn;t seem like a good choice as a hole puncher either being that the last place you want to skimp on quality on such a rifle.
I also believe Noveske call his barrel a "modified polygonal" rifled barrel. I know he mentioned how close he held the info on his "buttons". From what I understand most true poly barrels, if not all, are CHF. THe gradual widening of groupings before keyholing is a characteristic of button and cut barrels. Poly barrels from what I understand pretty much go to key holing when shot out.
I;ve had some cocktails so pardon me if none of that made sense.

This could happen because at a CQB class you are likely engaging targets at <100yds. A shot out barrel is one that has had it's throat eroded away such that it can no longer hold the bullet so that is enters the rifling at the correct angle. It is well known in the benchrest community that a barrel can be "shot out" and no longer capable of holding 1 MOA at 600, but still be serviceable and hold MOA at let's say 200. This is because as the barrel's throat erodes it gets to the point where the jacket of the bullet is getting fouled as it enters the rifling. This causes the gases to not evenly surround the bullet as well as well as effect the predicable aerodynamics of the bullet in flight. This can create a barrel that is MOA at 100 yards, but 2 MOA at 600yds. So, if you are doing CQB classes at 100yd an in it could take until the barrel starts sending bullets end over end to realize it is shot out.
If you start with a cheap stainless barrel that has a throat machined with too much tolerance (tolerance is tighest in the throat) due to poor quality control in producing cheap barrels, your barrel could be "shot out" so to speak before you fire a round through it. That's why I questioned the guy on his barrel choice. It didn't make sense to me as a regular AR 'gunning', ride hard, etc. barrel and it didn;t seem like a good choice as a hole puncher either being that the last place you want to skimp on quality on such a rifle.
I also believe Noveske call his barrel a "modified polygonal" rifled barrel. I know he mentioned how close he held the info on his "buttons". From what I understand most true poly barrels, if not all, are CHF. THe gradual widening of groupings before keyholing is a characteristic of button and cut barrels. Poly barrels from what I understand pretty much go to key holing when shot out.
I;ve had some cocktails so pardon me if none of that made sense.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 7:34 am to Propagandalf
quote:
didn;t seem like a good choice as a hole puncher either being that the last place you want to skimp on quality on such a rifle.
Understood. I would normally agree with you but this is going on the first AR15 I ever built which I built as an exercise to see how cheap I could build a rifle. I spent months watching AR15.com equipment exchange board and deals message boards at Reddit and Calguns snatching up cheap parts every time I would see one go on sale. Including shipping I had less than $420 in the whole rifle. There were some things I spent a little more to get so it wasn't totally bargain basement. I wanted a 7075 buffer tube. I didn't trust the cheapest LPK I could get at the time which was the Anderson because I didn't like the stainless steel trigger and hammer setups. Because of price it has an upper and lower in the white. It is the AR I shoot the least. I've maybe put 300 rounds through it in a year. I bough the stainless barrel not because I wanted to shoot sub MOA national matches, but because it would aesthetically match the upper and lower set that was in the white.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:32 am to Uncle JackD
quote:
Who'd you order from in laffy?
nobody. I ordered from silencershop.com in texas. great service. absolutely fantastic!
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:36 am to Fat Bastard
Awesome. I got mine from landry guns.. Planning to purchase a spikes lower today and filing form 1.
Picking this lower up for my future SBR

Picking this lower up for my future SBR

This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 10:41 am
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:48 am to Uncle JackD
quote:
I got mine from landry guns..
what brand and caliber?
i was going to get an osprey but they didn't have anymore so i settled on a griffin armament resistance 45. Got it for 589. price on griffin's website is 749! I got a huge discount thankfully. I'm using a lone wolf aftermarket threaded barrel for my G21.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 10:56 am to Fat Bastard
Silencerco hybrid & sparrow
Posted on 7/6/16 at 11:03 am to Uncle JackD
quote:
Silencerco hybrid & sparrow
wow. sounds nice.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 11:03 am to Fat Bastard
Yeah pretty pumped for January 2017 
Posted on 7/6/16 at 11:26 am to Uncle JackD
I picked up a Warlock II
Posted on 7/6/16 at 12:41 pm to Rickety Cricket
I alluded to this is another thread, but I plan on doing a quality build in the nearish future. Already have a stripped lower.
Working under the assumption that HillBill wins, what parts should I buy in advance? I fully expect enhanced regulations. Pistol grip? Stock? Magazine release?
Working under the assumption that HillBill wins, what parts should I buy in advance? I fully expect enhanced regulations. Pistol grip? Stock? Magazine release?
Posted on 7/6/16 at 12:54 pm to jimbeam
Lower is the most important part.. Buy a LPK Bc they will be scarce soon I'm sure.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 12:58 pm to jimbeam
You have the part that matters (lower). Any and everything will be scarce if it gets to post Sandyhook levels of demand/hoarding.
ETA: if you're gonna get anything, stock up on mags and ammo
ETA: if you're gonna get anything, stock up on mags and ammo
This post was edited on 7/6/16 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 7/6/16 at 1:28 pm to Soul Gleaux
If it's possible for them to ban AR parts like stocks, LPK, bolts, etc then I assume they will.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 2:14 pm to uway
quote:
If it's possible for them to ban AR parts like stocks, LPK, bolts, etc then I assume they will.
I would be more worried about trying to find a BCG or LPK with all of the hoarding that will go on if she gets elected. After SH parts were very hard to come by and good parts were almost impossible to find.
Posted on 7/6/16 at 3:11 pm to uway
quote:
If it's possible for them to ban AR parts like stocks, LPK, bolts, etc then I assume they will.
They did in the 90s
Posted on 7/6/16 at 3:29 pm to jimbeam
quote:
Working under the assumption that HillBill wins, what parts should I buy in advance? I fully expect enhanced regulations. Pistol grip? Stock? Magazine release?
Another option is to just buy a complete rifle since they are still cheaper than ever. Working with your assumption that prices will skyrocket you could upgrade pieces as you were able to find them available and sell off your leftovers from you 'basic rifle' fairly easily if there is a true sandy hook style panic.
If you wait for a panic you'll be left paying at least 2x current retail for all the bits and pieces...if you can find them. The time is now while everything is still at rock bottom.
Popular
Back to top


0









