- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mass vs velocity? What are your thoughts? .45 superior to 9mm
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:24 am to KingRanch
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:24 am to KingRanch
quote:
As stupid as the 40
Right because faster, flatter, deeper penetrating projectiles aren't what this all about. 1400 fps sucks, and it's not fun to shoot at all.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:34 am to KingRanch
quote:Best two pistol rounds ever designed.
357 SIG
As stupid as the 40
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:37 am to KingRanch
Well, anything would be better than a .45. Fat and slow is no way to handle these situations.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:39 am to AlxTgr
He only likes calibers that fit the 1911 platform. Seems like anyway
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:39 am to AlxTgr
quote:
LOL at the .40 cal downvoter.
I just downvoted because I know what you are trying to do . . .
. . . and I am mad that I didn't post it first.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:42 am to DanTiger
quote:
Penetration is generally giving in inches and those are always measured from center mass entrance. I cannot blame the manufacturers for this as it makes the bullet performance sound better from a marketing stand point.
I think the reason manufacturers test with the standard 4 layers plus gel is just that - to make the test standard.
quote:
Who would want to say "our bullet penetrates only 9" after passing though a forarm bone"?
I think the liberals would get their panties in a wad over this statement.
quote:
I am simply asking if you think slowing the bullet prior to a center mass strike will have more of an effect on a bullet that relies more on mass or velocity?
If talking from a purely physics standpoint, I'd say the heavier one. But then again, I'm sure I don't take all the factors into account like a ballistician does.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:08 pm to Choirboy
quote:I want a 1911, but not in .45.
He only likes calibers that fit the 1911 platform
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:13 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I want a 1911, but not in .45.
What caliber are you leaning towards?
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:26 pm to Gaston
quote:
Right because faster, flatter, deeper penetrating projectiles aren't what this all about. 1400 fps sucks, and it's not fun to shoot at all
Yep. I love my .357 sig conversion barrel for my XD. It gets a little expensive to shoot a lot, but very fun.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:27 pm to DanTiger
Listen to Bapple on this. Higher velocity offsets higher bullet weight. Penetration is not just those two factors though. It's also cross section of the bullet. It's like if you're trying to push a pencil vs a broom handle through a piece of leather. Lot easier with the pencil.
For pistols though, it's really negligible either way. You're going to have to keep shooting if you don't hit them exactly right. It's not like a high powered rifle where a higher velocity can get you with the heavy hydrostatic shock inches away from a good hit.
Pick a pistol you are comfortable shooting and carrying all the time and shoot it a lot.
That's the real answer to your question.
For pistols though, it's really negligible either way. You're going to have to keep shooting if you don't hit them exactly right. It's not like a high powered rifle where a higher velocity can get you with the heavy hydrostatic shock inches away from a good hit.
Pick a pistol you are comfortable shooting and carrying all the time and shoot it a lot.
That's the real answer to your question.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:27 pm to Choirboy
quote:9
What caliber are you leaning towards?
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:35 pm to AlxTgr
how many 9mm 1911's are there?
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:35 pm to DanTiger
Making mountains out of molehills. Seriously doubt shooting through an arm is enough of a concern to switch ammo design or caliber.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:36 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
It's also cross section of the bullet. It's like if you're trying to push a pencil vs a broom handle through a piece of leather. Lot easier with the pencil.
Very true. This also shows that if a person is limited to FMJ ammo, it's best to go with the larger 45 because a bigger bullet makes a bigger hole. Of course, once you get to hollow points, the playing field is much more leveled.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:38 pm to AlxTgr
357 is my next 1911 purchase
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:40 pm to KingRanch
could 38 sp be shot out of the 357 1911? or, just with cylinder wheel gun?
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:43 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
Pick a pistol you are comfortable shooting and carrying all the time and shoot it a lot.
This.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:43 pm to Ole Geauxt
Yes, with a recoil spring change
Posted on 3/20/14 at 1:44 pm to KingRanch
quote:
KingRanch
And you told me that crap about Coonans not being fit very well. You're stealing my idea fatty. I will be the first Coonan owner on this forum.
Popular
Back to top


1







