- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LDWF deer regulations changes ????
Posted on 12/14/21 at 6:24 pm to ABucks11
Posted on 12/14/21 at 6:24 pm to ABucks11
Plenty go unbred if your herd is out of whack. Proven fact in many areas. Easy math for ya.
Boudreaux shoots his limits of bucks every year and 1 doe per year. After year 3 of the lease he notices only a few fawns. Sit down and give Boudreaux the facts:
Boudreaux you shot all but two of the bucks in your area. You have 80 does now. "they don't make deer viagra Boudreaux" He sad now.
Boudreaux shoots his limits of bucks every year and 1 doe per year. After year 3 of the lease he notices only a few fawns. Sit down and give Boudreaux the facts:
Boudreaux you shot all but two of the bucks in your area. You have 80 does now. "they don't make deer viagra Boudreaux" He sad now.
0
Posted on 12/14/21 at 6:27 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
If they don’t go unbred they are bred so late that fawn mortality is super high and that sucks.
This is very true and hard for many to understand. If your does far out number your bucks, the ones that get bred second because they were missed in first rut, will suffer gestation in heat of summer and fawns when vegetation burns down in early fall.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 6:47 pm to unclejhim
that is not on the table state wide
Posted on 12/14/21 at 7:44 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:I hope you're right!!
that is not on the table state wide
Posted on 12/14/21 at 7:45 pm to choupiquesushi
Certain parts of the state could really benefit from this.
If the state would get serious on hog, open a bear season, and do a better job with timber management we would really be getting somewhere.
If the state would get serious on hog, open a bear season, and do a better job with timber management we would really be getting somewhere.
This post was edited on 12/14/21 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 12/14/21 at 7:58 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:
open a bear season
I'm all for a bear season but bears ain't hurting deer. There's only like 2k bears irrc
Posted on 12/14/21 at 8:50 pm to GREENHEAD22
quote:
If the state would get serious on hog, open a bear season, and do a better job with timber management we would really be getting somewhere.
Does the state or feds cut any timber on public land? I was told some years ago that they don’t due ti liberal anti-logging policies.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 8:53 pm to Loup
Bears are hurting deer where there are bears. We had ten different bears on 1300 acres in September.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 8:53 pm to REB BEER
They can on all state WMAs, or at least they use to be.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 8:54 pm to Loup
New state and federal studies beg to differ. They hammer fawns, there is a reason why OOS bear tags in CO are $100.
This post was edited on 12/14/21 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 12/14/21 at 8:57 pm to REB BEER
quote:LDWF does for certain.
Does the state or feds cut any timber on public land? I was told some years ago that they don’t due ti liberal anti-logging policies.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 9:22 pm to TigerDeacon
Indeed. Ain’t that the damn truth. Lol
Posted on 12/14/21 at 10:02 pm to REB BEER
"Does the state or feds cut any timber on public land? I was told some years ago that they don’t due ti liberal anti-logging policies."
Forest management of USFS and BLM land is awful out west. Not enough thinning and logging. Allows the forest to become unhealthy and overstocked. Insects and disease increase. Fires become more intense. All mainly due to liberals not understanding and accepting the importance of thinning and logging.
Forest management of USFS and BLM land is awful out west. Not enough thinning and logging. Allows the forest to become unhealthy and overstocked. Insects and disease increase. Fires become more intense. All mainly due to liberals not understanding and accepting the importance of thinning and logging.
Posted on 12/14/21 at 11:19 pm to unclejhim
I would love to see a June/July season.
Posted on 12/15/21 at 5:01 am to REB BEER
quote:
Does the state or feds cut any timber on public land? I was told some years ago that they don’t due ti liberal anti-logging policies.
Kisatchie is logged all the time. Not by the feds themselves, but since it's federal land, it's the same process.
There is definitely logging occurring on Sherburne, and on parts not owned by LDWF. Some of the recent logging activity (within last 5 years) was on USFWS and Corps of Engineers land.
Posted on 12/15/21 at 6:19 am to 257WBY
Lots of states (Maine for one) are loaded with deer and bear. Moose also...
Posted on 12/15/21 at 6:20 am to unclejhim
Long overdue, no one needs to shoot six deer, especially these Boudreaux's coming up north and shooting every spike and button buck that walks.
Posted on 12/15/21 at 6:50 am to unclejhim
Maine has a bear season and low deer harvest numbers.
Research in Tensas proved bears are a major deer predator.
Research in Tensas proved bears are a major deer predator.
Posted on 12/15/21 at 7:51 am to Strannix
quote:
no one needs to shoot six deer
Oh really?
Posted on 12/15/21 at 8:03 am to GREENHEAD22
quote:
New state and federal studies beg to differ. They hammer fawns, there is a reason why OOS bear tags in CO are $100.
I meant at their current population level. Maybe locally but state wide they aren't making a significant impact on deer populations.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News