- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:25 pm to rsoudelier1
quote:
commerce is usually mentioned because carrying produce and merchandise is the usual public demand for such waters
Throw out the 1812 Map ... let's rely on the banana fed ex boat and the pelt carrying UPS raft. That makes sense.
Please just say you want to go fish where the fish are because the fish are there because the public didn't catch all of them. Cut to the chase.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:28 pm to OverboredTgr
I really don't get it, is it that troubling to catch fish on public waters?
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:33 pm to AlxTgr
In all cases it's for Bill as long as it has a proper permit and that it does not pose an environmental hazard (which will be attached to the permit) And I don't think the screen can be added. It most def cannot entrap the fish.
And hopefully Bill doesn't be offended when sport fish coalition call him names.
And hopefully Bill doesn't be offended when sport fish coalition call him names.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:33 pm to AlxTgr
In all cases it's for Bill as long as it has a proper permit and that it does not pose an environmental hazard (which will be attached to the permit) And I don't think the screen can be added. It most def cannot entrap the fish.
And hopefully Bill doesn't be offended when sport fish coalition call him names.
And hopefully Bill doesn't be offended when sport fish coalition call him names.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:34 pm to Motorboat
quote:You can do it!
Your hypothetical is too much like work
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:35 pm to OverboredTgr
quote:Why?
In all cases it's for Bill
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:44 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Why?
Because it's man made, same with man made canals. You get approval to create it from the government. Nature has to make it.
This post was edited on 4/19/18 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:48 pm to AlxTgr
Will I get a prize? Let me take a stab in the dark.. toss a couple of darts at the ole Louisiana Land Triva Board.... gimme a minute to goolge it
The state by way of eminent domain claimed all navigable waters and sea shore upon entry into the Union in 1812. Every other square inch of the state was basically sold unless it was deemed section 16 property for development of schools etc. And some section 16 property was divided into lots and sold if a navigable water way claimed by the State in 1812 cut through it. So William ESQ and his pond is will still be part of the William ESQ private estsate even if he cuts through Bayou Hypo.
The state by way of eminent domain claimed all navigable waters and sea shore upon entry into the Union in 1812. Every other square inch of the state was basically sold unless it was deemed section 16 property for development of schools etc. And some section 16 property was divided into lots and sold if a navigable water way claimed by the State in 1812 cut through it. So William ESQ and his pond is will still be part of the William ESQ private estsate even if he cuts through Bayou Hypo.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 3:52 pm to Dam Guide
quote:Wait, I thought we wanted access to all canals?
Because it's man made, same with man made canals.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:18 pm to Scrowe
No, it is perfectly fine to catch your legal creel limit on all public waters of the State of Louisiana as long as you are properly licensed to do so.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:22 pm to OverboredTgr
Maybe I just think that Louisiana being the outlier when it comes to defining navigability has perpetrated a miscarriage of justice on its citizens to the benefit of a few wealthy landowners
Posted on 4/19/18 at 4:29 pm to rsoudelier1
quote:
perpetrated a miscarriage of justice on its citizens to the benefit of a few wealthy landowners
Posted on 4/19/18 at 7:43 pm to rsoudelier1
I've only lurked this thread, because the topic has been debated forever.
I was with you, you were on the right track here, but....
What a bunch of dramatic BS.
You gonna start making me agree with Alx....and I like fishing in washed out marsh.
quote:
I just think that Louisiana being the outlier when it comes to defining navigability
I was with you, you were on the right track here, but....
quote:
perpetrated a miscarriage of justice on its citizens to the benefit of a few wealthy landowners
What a bunch of dramatic BS.
You gonna start making me agree with Alx....and I like fishing in washed out marsh.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 7:54 pm to dat yat
Posted on 4/19/18 at 8:08 pm to rsoudelier1
quote:
You may want to look at the law regarding drones flying over your house. It states that a drone cannot fly over your home if it is engaging in an act of spying such as photographing or audio recording. But the simple act of flying a drone over your home as long as the drone meets certain requirements that fall outside of FAA regulations so that most drones you purchase at best buy or Target are perfectly legal to fly over your neighbors home.
So you can use the canal to get from one place to the next, but you can't fish in it? I don't think that's what the proponents want
Posted on 4/19/18 at 8:39 pm to cajun12
How did you decipher that from my post?
Posted on 4/19/18 at 9:35 pm to rsoudelier1
How about we all stop complaining to each other and direct this same energy and effort towards out elected officials and the press who can actually do something about it.....,
Posted on 4/20/18 at 12:03 am to dat yat
Same boat I'm in. I gotta agree with somebody from ellic because the arguments from the other side are so asinine that I can't be over there. And I'm pissed I can't fish where I want in golden meadow anymore but if I owned that land I'd be putting up huge gates and signs referencing this bill with vile language
These clowns get their way and my deer lease (which we've had for going on 70 years) will become public overnight. frickkkkkkkkkkk that.
These clowns get their way and my deer lease (which we've had for going on 70 years) will become public overnight. frickkkkkkkkkkk that.
This post was edited on 4/20/18 at 12:04 am
Posted on 4/20/18 at 12:13 am to cajunboatman
quote:I did and so did others. I get tired of hearing that this bill failed "because Louisiana has the most corrupt politicians in the country." I contact my legislators the same way anyone else does. It failed because it was a bad bill
direct this same energy and effort towards out elected officials
quote:This one is worn out too... There are literally thousands of marshland owners that this would directly impact. You think all of them are wealthy just because they own some land?
benefit of a few wealthy landowners
Page 28 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News