- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: HR 391 (Water Access Rights) Passes 5-3 in committee
Posted on 4/16/18 at 6:01 pm to AlxTgr
Posted on 4/16/18 at 6:01 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Love seeing all this new blood in here.
I'll be here to stay after this blows over, just took something so idiotic to bring me out of the woodwork of lurking. Hell, if it wasn't for using my wife's (pics upon request for "public access" fee) Facebook to follow these geniuses I wouldn't have anything to entertain me lately while waiting for another hunting season.
The latest and greatest is boycotting all big business/big oil who vote no so that means a lot of those guys will be quitting their jobs and opening up some positions at the oil companies.
0
Posted on 4/17/18 at 10:42 am to orange132
We are gonna need a live report about all the guys wearing fishing shirts to the capital later today.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 11:39 am to Motorboat
They just walked past the seal on the no. 3 tub with the beach ball. 
Posted on 4/17/18 at 1:27 pm to Motorboat
Posted on 4/17/18 at 3:41 pm to Mark Makers
This is the correct link, they just started debate on it...
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:17 pm to Mark Makers
Missed the debate, but it looks like some amendments were adopted and that it was referred to the civil law committee.
here is the engrossed digest: LINK
here is the engrossed digest: LINK
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:23 pm to Motorboat
adopted an amendment that it doesn't go into effect until 2020
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:29 pm to Motorboat
They're still debating amendments right now.
Those were the ones that were added to get it out of committee
quote:
here is the engrossed digest: LINK
Those were the ones that were added to get it out of committee
Posted on 4/17/18 at 4:31 pm to LaTexan
Posted on 4/17/18 at 5:39 pm to LaTexan
On another not did I hear that HB 549 pass? So all house boats have to be registered now like a motor boat.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 5:53 pm to civiltiger07
What??? Please send a link on that
Posted on 4/17/18 at 5:58 pm to tgrbaitn08
It did not pass 38-58.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 5:59 pm to LaTexan
All Yall Baws better stay off my property now. With Ya Gator Tails, and Ya Air boats. Tickets for everybody.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 6:01 pm to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 4/17/18 at 6:03 pm to civiltiger07
After countless amendments and even more attempts at amendments it failed.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 6:11 pm to Dock Holiday
I’m from NELA so I really do not know the lay of land/water south of I-10. But how can 80% of costal waterways be deemed private? Seems like it’s a huge black eye on the state. I also own land and understand landowners concerns as well. Is there no happy medium? Seems like the public have been fishing these water for years, why the change now? Also why is billions of both federal/state dollars being used to restore land that is then reverted to the land owner? Why not make the landowners foot that bill if they want to privatize a public resource? So many questions.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 6:11 pm to Dock Holiday
quote:
After countless amendments and even more attempts at amendments it failed.
Probably for the best. This bill did nothing but start a fight.
Posted on 4/17/18 at 6:19 pm to dpark
quote:
I’m from NELA so I really do not know the lay of land/water south of I-10. But how can 80% of costal waterways be deemed private? Seems like it’s a huge black eye on the state. I also own land and understand landowners concerns as well. Is there no happy medium? Seems like the public have been fishing these water for years, why the change now? Also why is billions of both federal/state dollars being used to restore land that is then reverted to the land owner? Why not make the landowners foot that bill if they want to privatize a public resource? So many questions.
A few good questions and a few stinkers. It boils down to land owners exercising their right to restrict access to private property. Most of what is private had no water on it when it was sold. It makes a little bit of sense to some people and none to others.
Meanwhile you should just go fishing. If someone asks you to leave, just apologize and leave. Do the best you can, try to keep an eye out for duck blinds, and enjoy the 800k acres of public land. It's impossible not to trespass in some places but it's not impossible to avoid trouble.
Page 21 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News